Notices

1987 5 liter HO backfire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 06:14 PM
  #1  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

1987 5 liter HO backfire

The 5.0 liter HO in my 1987 Mustang has been backfiring through the intake more and more in recent years. Sometimes it happens while under load when cold, but other times it's less predictable, like just firing up when starting, or off/on throttle when changing gears.

The engine has just over 150k miles on it, is stock with these exceptions:

- Recently added 1.7:1 roller rockers that replaced the stock 1.6:1 types (didn't change backfiring tendencies)
- 70mm throttle body
- 1.5" tubular shorty headers.

What I've done so far:

- basic tune up with new cap/rotor/plugs/wires and setting timing
- Replaced HEGO sensors
- scrubbed out build-up in intake tracts
- back-flushed each fuel injector, soaked nozzles in carb cleaner
- checked the ECT sensor with ohmmeter cold and hot (measured OK)
- ran EEC diagnostics (EVP sensor error, which it's had forever)

The only other cause I can think of for backfiring through the intake is maybe the ignition timing is unstable, like maybe the distributor shaft is worn. But that does not seem obvious to me.

What are some other causes for this?
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by xlt4wd90
What are some other causes for this?
Weak valve springs.
A broken or bent intake valve.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 04:05 AM
  #3  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Thanks Conan

Weak valve springs are likely, given the mileage on the engine, and I do rev it hard some times. Of course, that might lead to bent valves as well, but I would expect that to cause problems all the time.

Checking this out would be difficult.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2010 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
No.. do a compression and leakdown test on the motor.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:52 PM
  #5  
orng1's Avatar
orng1
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
From: Paramount, Ca
I've been working on a lot of fords recently and of 4 of them 3 have had cut vac lines on the back of the intake and other places. Seems like they just wear and compress under vac and in time with no flow they rip. Double check that. It's free or cheap.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 01:44 AM
  #6  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Thanks orng1 for that tip; the symptoms do seem to indicate a temporary lean condition.

When I cleaned out the fuel injectors, I had the whole upper intake off (and replaced the leaky valve cover gaskets at the same time). Putting it back together, I made sure all the vacuum lines were intact. I did break the plastic line that went from the tree to the AC system, but since I caught it, I replaced it with a rubber line. But just to see what happens with that small leak, I left it off and took it for a test drive. It definitely backfired a lot more, especially under load. So back it goes, and the engine seems to perform normally, with just that single burp every once in a while under load. The repairs I did didn't seem to change that.

One other thing I found when I took off the fuel rail was some damage in the rubber cover over the cross-over line that connected between the two sides of the fuel rail. It was pushed tightly against the back of the lower intake manifold, and vibrations started to rub through the outer rubber cover that was protecting the plastic fuel line. I guess it did its job, but I put a layer of heater hose over that for more protection. Had I not pulled off the fuel rail to do this service, I would not have seem the damage, and eventually the manifold would have worn through the outer cover, then through the fuel line, then...

So I finally did a compression test today, and all but 2 cylinders read about 179 psi; C2 showed 175 and C8 showed 173, as close as my eyeballs can tell from the coarse markings on the gauge. I don't have a leak-down tester, so I couldn't do that test. Could those 2 cylinders with the lower reading be leaking? Should I pursue them with a leak-down test?
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 02:30 AM
  #7  
orng1's Avatar
orng1
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
From: Paramount, Ca
No, numbers that close are good. If 1 read 110 or a noticeable difference then yes. Less than 5 percent is fine.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2010 | 02:41 PM
  #8  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Thanks again orng1.

So it's sounding more like a temporary lean condition. Maybe I need to monitor the fuel pressure during heavy loads. Unfortunately my pressure gauge just screws onto the Schrader valve on the fuel rail, and in-cockpit pressure gauges are tricky to install. Or I can just slowly crank up the pressure regulator and see if that helps.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
TenHoles's Avatar
TenHoles
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Could be a streched timing chain too.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #10  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Thanks Tenholes, the engine is 23 years old with 150k miles on it, so it's very likely the timing chain is worn. It came from Ford with a double-roller timing chain, and I heard that was supposed to last longer than the link-belt type chain. Although, I had to replace the front cover gasket a couple years ago, and when I checked the chain slop, it was within the specs shown in the Ford service manual (forgot what that was).
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #11  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,103
Likes: 384
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
I vote for Timing chain!
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #12  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Make sure you have adequate vacuum. Do you have a erratic idle? The most common problem with our fuel injected fords are the idle air bypass valve, maybe its sticking open? On my Mustang I pull the vacuum line to the fuel pressure regulator and plug the line. That will give you instant throttle response and improve your 60ft time at the track. It will at least richen you up under low rpm part throttle load and give you more information to work with.

Where do you set your timing at?

That is excellent compression, some new motors don't have that much.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 04:15 AM
  #13  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Hmmm, I'm going to try turning the engine backwards while looking at the distributor to see how much play there is in the timing chain.

The idle is actually pretty solid, around 700 rpm. The IAC seems to be working pretty well; pulling its plug causes the idle to drop. The timing is steady at 10 btdc. But I wonder if it's possible to detect a loose chain by blipping the engine while watching for timing flutter?

I've cranked up the fuel pressure regulator by a couple PSI to see how the engine responds. Unfortunately it's been raining pretty hard the last couple of days, and it's difficult to do hard acceleration tests with a Mustang in the wet. But I'll keep an my ears open for little pops during the next drives.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Pulling the vacuum line to the regulator will give over 10psi. For drag racing its a big improvement. But trying to think of your symptom I can't help but think of a neighbor's pickup that would buck under low rpm part throttle load and the cause was his not very old spark plug wires. Is it a studder or a pop?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2010 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 208
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

It's definitely a pop out the intake, like a sudden lean condition. But it's so irregular that it's hard to predict when it would do it, and the only consistency is it only does it when the throttle was being opened for applying a load to the engine. I've also checked the TPS, which showed smooth operations. Of course, that does not guarantee that there's nothing wrong with it, so I also replaced it, which did not help either.

I didn't replace the plug wires yet, but I guess I can try that next. It's hard to tell if each fix I tried actually fixed the problem, until the problem recurs. Then the answer is, no.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE