Notices
View Poll Results: Which rebuild would you be willing to pay for?
Wild- turbo, WP heads, standalone ECU
0
0%
Mild- higher comp, upgraded cam, etc
0
0%
Vanilla stock; AKA This guy's off his rocker
0
0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Built Performance 2.9L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 04:54 PM
  #1  
fast_farmboy's Avatar
fast_farmboy
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Built Performance 2.9L

I'm looking to gauge the interest in a performance 2.9L engine. Mild build would include high volume oil pump, high compression pistons, ported heads, matched intake, etc.

Higher build would include turbo, world product cast heads, possibly a standalone engine management

Would you buy something like this? How interested and how willing to pay would you be? PM me for a price point if you'd like, just looking to get some feedback on this idea I had. Would there be more interest in a 4.0 version?
 

Last edited by fast_farmboy; Nov 23, 2010 at 05:03 PM. Reason: Sounded like a scratchy vinyl record the first time out
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #2  
TBFGhost's Avatar
TBFGhost
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
the 2.9l is a dog of a motor in what is now a VERY old entry level truck....there won't be a huge market for this...
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #3  
fast_farmboy's Avatar
fast_farmboy
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
It's a decent enough motor, I was just looking if there was a niche market.
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 10:52 PM
  #4  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,419
Likes: 2,777
Club FTE Gold Member
IF I could get away with that level of engine mods, I could also get away with a 4.0 or even a 4.0 SOHC or a 302. 2.9 was ok in '86, but most 4 cylinders will run away from it now.....
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 12:38 AM
  #5  
TBFGhost's Avatar
TBFGhost
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
exactly....the 2.9 is a very dated motor...with way better options out there.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
jimbbski's Avatar
jimbbski
Elder User
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Chicago area
I have a Ranger with the 2.9L and while it ran OK stock I know enough about the Ford Colonge V6 that it is not a 'performance" engine.

I rebuilt 2 - 2.8L v6 engines that came in the German Capir's back in the 70"s. I was disapointed in the results. The one with a mild cam ran no better then stock and the other ran good only at high RPM.
In Europe they did get they to run well but in this day & age with 4 vlave per cylinder engines that old v6 is just an iron lump. Easy & cheap is a 302 swap with a T-5 using junk yard parts.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2010 | 09:51 PM
  #7  
Ziegelsteinfaust's Avatar
Ziegelsteinfaust
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 2
From: Chino Hills
You could do a small STS turbo system with a properly set up carb, but the cost around $3000 if your a decent mechanic can be a bit high.

Considering a 302 should bolt in or some other better version of a motor that would of come in your truck for quite a bit less giving comperable HP with out the turbo headache's.

Not that I wouldn't turbo a 2.9 to be different, but for the money spent you could of been better off with other swaps.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #8  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 202
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

I have a 4.0L v6 in my Aerostar, and I would be interested in some kind of performance upgrade for it that would fit in the tight engine compartment. So that means mods that do not take up any more space, like replacement throttle body, intake, OHV heads, cam, headers, and exhaust system; no superchargers or turbochargers, or OHC heads.

There used to be a company called 4.0 Performance that did amazing performance mods to that engine, and sold some parts for it. I spoke to one of their representatives once, and he provided a tip for minor improvements that I have yet to try out. But unfortunately, they do not exist anymore, probably due to lack of a market.

I think BBK (Brother's Performance) may still sell a supercharger and other parts for it for use in Rangers or Explorers.

If you have the room, I would install a 302 instead of trying to soup up a v6. It will be much easier and cheaper, and you can be guaranteed continued availability of parts.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #9  
Old93junk's Avatar
Old93junk
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 23,849
Likes: 20
From: McKenzie River
A 4.0 swap would be your best bet.
The 2.9 is forever linked to its infamous cracked heads and blown head gaskets, not worth the hassle and expense.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #10  
Charles Espenshade's Avatar
Charles Espenshade
New User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
I have a '88 Ranger with the 2.9 and a 5 speed manual trans, It's far from being a dog. I think I might have blown the head gasket but I will rebuild. I'm thinking on a Super-Charger!
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #11  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 202
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

If you blew the head gasket on the stock engine, you will blow it even faster with a super charger. I think the problem is that the way the coolant passages are shaped, the heads just do not provide enough clamping on the gaskets. So more combustion pressure just makes it worse.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2015 | 08:20 AM
  #12  
Russ Bowles's Avatar
Russ Bowles
New User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Look up Tom Morano'so 3.5 stroker kit

Originally Posted by fast_farmboy
I'm looking to gauge the interest in a performance 2.9L engine. Mild build would include high volume oil pump, high compression pistons, ported heads, matched intake, etc.

Higher build would include turbo, world product cast heads, possibly a standalone engine management

Would you buy something like this? How interested and how willing to pay would you be? PM me for a price point if you'd like, just looking to get some feedback on this idea I had. Would there be more interest in a 4.0 version?
Tim that would be fantastic
Tom Morano Racing / Toronto Canada
ok here we go
drop in no retune. 3.5 Liter stroker kit
and complete engines
get the kit and do your builds
Do (do) priority main oiling as well
Roller conversion heads n some other options . Just check em out !
I am ^ Tom is Kool as I talked to him 2 days ago . Quite knowledgeable.
However customs is a Bear at the border for complete engines and Tom prefers not ! Again Hwvr you can
ship heads etc in component form
And assemble yourself at your level
Not recommended for amateurs.
As far as world products/ world castings isn't presently selling any heads for the 2.9
Go with tommoranoracing.Com
Doubt he has international patents
filed or registered IP. Rights
copywrighting. Is first process step
Let me know if u can do the 3.5 stroker HERE in the US
as I PRESENTLY want one complete
Thanks guys
enjoy .
No I am not a friend of Tom Morano
He does 3.8's and 4.0 as well
For 4.0 conversion as I understand
u go twin came
sohc won't bolt up correctly unless u basically change everything.
Russbrenbowles@gmail.com
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Faber
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
93
Nov 27, 2016 04:13 AM
jekyll_hyde
Bronco II
27
Aug 23, 2016 10:22 PM
1L243
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
Dec 16, 2015 08:08 PM
1973dieselhighboy
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
1
Oct 4, 2015 07:11 PM
shovelhead1
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
51
Feb 21, 2014 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.