CAI
Instead they want you to save that money for the worthless Navteq map updates.
and obviously you haven't tried the Banks. Ford stock (for 08 308 cfm Banks 500)
You'll get all of the arguments to save your money, as the stock intake is as good as it gets. I agree that it flows well, just have a problem with the looks. I have always dressed up the engines of my vehicles, so I'll be putting on another intake sometime, just hoping for the Banks to be released soon.
Flow Bench Test Results - Power Hungry Performance Forum
CFM= <ACRONYM title="Revolutions per Minute" sab="1144">RPM</ACRONYM> x DISPLACEMENT /3456 x VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY
Assuming a .90 volumetric efficiency and 4000 RPMs (most of us operate below 4000 RPMs more than 90% of the time).
CFM = 4000 x 330/3456 x .9 = 343.75 CFM
At 5500 RPMs, 472.656 CFM is needed.
If you like your intake; go for it. Your money, your truck.
If you're not sure, do your research before you invest in the under-the-hood-bling for your 09-10.
At 5500 RPMs, 472.656 CFM is needed.
Thanks for the numbers.
Last edited by msgtord; Nov 20, 2010 at 05:32 PM. Reason: add
Trending Topics
I can understand wheels and tires more then I can just doing an intake for looks, although I'm not a fan of spending any more money then I have to for wheels and tires. It's your money and if it makes you happy more power to you, I just don't understand the logic behind it especially on something that is going to be a premium like the Banks intake.
In general about performance of intakes and flowing more. It isn't just the mere fact on if they flow more then stock, it's when they flow more then stock. If it flows more on the downswing of the HP/TQ curve then what good is it to you?
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
It's obvious that you have never spent an afternoon helping a friend install a set of headers in his hot rod chevy. Or took apart a carb just to see how it's made, all in the name of fun. Maybe you don't go to car shows and see what car nuts do to their machines, just for ideas. You don't look at an automobile as a work of art, or appreciate the hard work an owner has put into a beautiful machine. Have you ever just looked under the hood of an automobile just to see how it's put together? Do you look at an engine and wonder what the engineers would have done if the bean counters in the company hadn't have put constraints on them?
Your comment disrespects the hard work and dreams of the greats in automotive history that are still out there living the dream. Those like Banks, Edlebrock, Roush, Saleen, and a generation of others as well as the greatest automotive designer of all time, (in my opinion) Chip Foose. He understands the "bling" under the hood.
There are hundreds on this website alone that know exactly what I am talking about. They are the ones that come on the site to share knowledge, and a passion for automobiles, especially their trucks.
We use our trucks for work and play. We use them as a hobby, because we would rather clean a dirty engine than sit and read a book. We have spent hours polishing a wheel, or the alum cover on a street bike. We don't wear our "bling" around our necks, it's on our truck. We look at our vehicles as a work in progress. Always feeling the need to do something to make it unique. To put our brand on it.
So whether it's the guy with the 32 roadster that he spent 5 years building, or the kid with the lowered Honda with the loud exhaust, that he spent his paycheck from McDonald's just to buy that muffler, there are those of us that just love automobiles. We have our old "Hot Rod" magazines in boxes, along with photographs of our beloved first car.
It's understandable that you don't understand the logic, because it's not logical.
Good luck to you.
You'll get all of the arguments to save your money, as the stock intake is as good as it gets. I agree that it flows well, just have a problem with the looks. I have always dressed up the engines of my vehicles, so I'll be putting on another intake sometime, just hoping for the Banks to be released soon.
If I were to spring for an intake, it would probably be an AEM brute force ..... but they don't have one for the '09 +.
After reading this thread, I better understand why.
Any one done a "Gott's" style mod to the existing air box yet?
It's obvious that you have never spent an afternoon helping a friend install a set of headers in his hot rod chevy. Or took apart a carb just to see how it's made, all in the name of fun. Maybe you don't go to car shows and see what car nuts do to their machines, just for ideas. You don't look at an automobile as a work of art, or appreciate the hard work an owner has put into a beautiful machine. Have you ever just looked under the hood of an automobile just to see how it's put together? Do you look at an engine and wonder what the engineers would have done if the bean counters in the company hadn't have put constraints on them?
Good luck to you.
and i'm with him on the point that it dont make any since... theres no use to a CAI... the only reason you need more air for the engine than a stock setup is if theirs an increased need for it after an increased need for more fuel with is, internal mods to the engine... just an exhaust wont make a difference. maybe a tune might... MIGHT... just depends on how wild of a tune...
my 92 Flareside is gonna be making right at or over 300 hp and almost 400 torque when i get it done in the next month or so, and well im gonna be using a stock intake... and it's gonna be just fine..
It's obvious that you have never spent an afternoon helping a friend install a set of headers in his hot rod chevy. Or took apart a carb just to see how it's made, all in the name of fun. Maybe you don't go to car shows and see what car nuts do to their machines, just for ideas. You don't look at an automobile as a work of art, or appreciate the hard work an owner has put into a beautiful machine. Have you ever just looked under the hood of an automobile just to see how it's put together? Do you look at an engine and wonder what the engineers would have done if the bean counters in the company hadn't have put constraints on them?
What I have done however is installed turbos, injectors, fuel pumps, RR kits, exhausts. I have designed vehicle wraps and other graphics, been apart of the installations of those as well.
I have spent numerous times at the dynos, hopefully be able to go to one on the 4th of December at a local hot rod diesel shop. Both behind the computer as well as behind the wheel on those dyno runs.
I would be very careful on your assumptions as it is obvious that you don't know my proclivities as they relate to this hobby.
As to the people that i have supposedly disrespected, I look at objective data, if that data shows that something isn't kosher I'm going to mention it, i don't care who the manufacture is as that is irrelevant as to whether or not a product is good.
I might also add that just because something worked on past vehicles doesn't mean that it will work on current vehicles. I can give you numerous examples within the diesel world especially as that is what I am most familiar with.
http://www.f150online.com/forums/2009-2011-f-150/360079-initial-dyno-results-2009-a.html
09-10 Gotts mod:
http://www.f150online.com/forums/200...010-model.html
http://www.f150online.com/forums/200...2010-f150.html
http://www.f150online.com/forums/200...10-models.html
And if you're considering the Volant A/M intake:
http://www.f150online.com/forums/2009-2011-f-150/431882-volant-air-system-review-loss.html




