Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

351 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 07:05 AM
  #1  
the Canadian's Avatar
the Canadian
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
351 heads

i am building a 302 for my 72 f-100 i have a chance to put 351 heads on the 302 can anyone tell me what i will need to do this job and what would be the advantages if any thanks.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 08:46 AM
  #2  
CropDusterMan's Avatar
CropDusterMan
Elder User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Valley Center, CA
From what I know, you'd probably need to re-do the pistons, bore and rings to give you the performance to match the slightly beefier heads of the 351. I just re-did my stock 302 heads-had a valve job done at a high end machine shop and they are amazing. There were several 302 head designs...specifically, the combust. chamber area. The later ones, beginning around '73 or so have a different design, small comb. chamber and from what I understand, they have higher compression as a result. Which ones do you have? They were designed for better fuel economy. Might be worth staying stock and rebuilding your 302's.??
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #3  
the Canadian's Avatar
the Canadian
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
351 heads

Originally Posted by CropDusterMan
From what I know, you'd probably need to re-do the pistons, bore and rings to give you the performance to match the slightly beefier heads of the 351. I just re-did my stock 302 heads-had a valve job done at a high end machine shop and they are amazing. There were several 302 head designs...specifically, the combust. chamber area. The later ones, beginning around '73 or so have a different design, small comb. chamber and from what I understand, they have higher compression as a result. Which ones do you have? They were designed for better fuel economy. Might be worth staying stock and rebuilding your 302's.??
Thanks for the advice. my block is 30 over with flat top pistons i am doing all new rings bearings cam intake carb headers thats about it. i have two sets of heads the original 72 with rail type rockers and a set of 78 heads with the boss style rockers. can you tell me what the rocker arm ratio is on stock sbf heads and what heads do you think i should use the 72s or the 78s or the 351s. thanks.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
bmuhlbach's Avatar
bmuhlbach
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 8
From: hinckley ohio
The heads will bolt on with no issues.The rocker arms should be the same after 1969 Ford made them all that you just torque them down and your done.Before 69 they were like a Chevy where you had to adjust them while the engine was running.The best heads were the 1970 4v heads I think they where 63 cc chambers.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
Victor L's Avatar
Victor L
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Just out of curiosity, are your heads the Windsor style, or the Cleveland style? They are both good swaps, but the Cleveland heads would require special intake and exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 02:55 PM
  #6  
CropDusterMan's Avatar
CropDusterMan
Elder User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Valley Center, CA
I think the later heads would probably be best. Mine are the later type where you simply torque down the rocker bolts....so much easier and less hassle. Are you doing a valve job? If so, I'd just stick with the stock 302's...besides, you have headers, that should be enough with all the other stuff you've done to bring the engine alive.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #7  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,472
Likes: 2,799
Club FTE Gold Member
What condition are the 351 heads? Do you have casting numbers off them?

Check the SBF forums, Conanski has a handle on all things SBF and some 351w heads are terrible.

There are 302 heads off Explorers that are better, and if you have to put money into these heads, best check some threads there first, or post there for more info. But have those numbers first.

351w head on a 302 used to be the way to go--30 years ago. Not necessarily the hot set up now.
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
the Canadian's Avatar
the Canadian
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
351 heads

Thanks everyone I will get back to you soon with more info.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 2
From: wyoming
cleveland/windsor?

If a cleveland need to change pistons for canted valve. Intake modification also on cleveland design. If just a windsor not a big change but believe the combustion chamber is bigger in stock form. I prefer the cleveland design due to better airflow due to better design. but their are tricks for the clevor motor when assembling. Old dirt track set up back in the day. it works well but keeping with the non canted valve design is better for simplicity. so what is you application is the big question??????
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #10  
jsutton's Avatar
jsutton
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 12
From: Northeast LA
If this is 351W heads then they have bigger head bolts and require a bushing to be installed in the bolt hole in the heads to adapt it down to the smaller bolt.

Trick Flow Specialties TFS-51400419 - Trick Flow® Head Bolt Bushings - Overview - SummitRacing.com
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by the Canadian
i have two sets of heads the original 72 with rail type rockers and a set of 78 heads with the boss style rockers. can you tell me what the rocker arm ratio is on stock sbf heads and what heads do you think i should use the 72s or the 78s or the 351s.
Stock rocker ratio for SBF is 1.6.
'78 was the smog era so those heads are complete junk.. hugh combustion chambers and small valves. What is the casting number on your 351 heads? Early 351 heads are better than most others but that's not saying much as even those require porting to make what I'd call respectable HP.. like 300+. Late model GT40's and the aftermarket is where you should be looking if you want performance worthy of the displacement.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steve33444
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Dec 12, 2014 08:33 PM
v10squirrel
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
6
Jul 10, 2007 08:54 PM
Ford347
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
16
Apr 7, 2007 07:36 PM
FordPickup460
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
5
Jul 12, 2004 03:14 PM
btnbronc
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
9
Feb 2, 2004 02:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE