When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
No idea of the psi. Normally the fronts would lock up first, but with a p/u, most of the vehicle weight is on the front braking system when the truck is not loaded.
I called Willwood, and the first thing they said was that I probably needed to drop from 1 1/4" mstr bore, to 1 1/8". Maybe I will install the 78 F350 mstr. and booster. The mstr. has a 1 1/16" bore, with the booster 1/2" diameter larger dual diaphams.
Sure it does, thats why it's sometimes called the "safety valve ". If it doesn't trip, it's stuck.
Originally Posted by mark a.
A simple Google search on prop valves will clear it up for the non believers. If it is working right you need to pump the brakes fast in a panic situation to get it to trip, thats why you should always pump the brakes slow when bleeding so you don't end up tripping the valve.
Now, if the prop valves on these trucks worked like you suggest, then whenever wheel cylinders fail, the appropriate reservoir in the master cylinder shouldn't drain until it's empty, but it does. But if it did, it wouldn't be a "proportioning valve" then would it? What you're referring to is a check valve, and while I can't say they don't exist on other cars or trucks, after having to deal with many wheel cylinder failures and the resulting cleanup, it's safe to say that such hardware doesn't exist on 70's Ford F-series trucks, which is what we are discussing here.
Firstly, a check valve actually only allows fluid to flow in one direction, by definition. Secondly, I have the same problems with the brakes on my pickup. I have new hardware all the way around but my brakes still suck. Also, when I set up the rears, they lock up good the first time or two that I hit the pedal and then go back to where they were before I adjusted them. Is this all to do with the automatic adjusting. Is this maybe why I don't seem to have as good of brakes as I think I should. Sorry to hijack but this might be a solution for both of us.
Firstly, a check valve actually only allows fluid to flow in one direction, by definition. Secondly, I have the same problems with the brakes on my pickup. I have new hardware all the way around but my brakes still suck. Also, when I set up the rears, they lock up good the first time or two that I hit the pedal and then go back to where they were before I adjusted them. Is this all to do with the automatic adjusting. Is this maybe why I don't seem to have as good of brakes as I think I should. Sorry to hijack but this might be a solution for both of us.
Are your adjusters installed the right way? I've done that on the 3/4 and 1 ton trucks with the Sterling rears...install the adjusters the wrong way and they'll unadjust the brakes. I'm not sure if that can be done on these trucks.
Now, if the prop valves on these trucks worked like you suggest, then whenever wheel cylinders fail, the appropriate reservoir in the master cylinder shouldn't drain until it's empty, but it does. But if it did, it wouldn't be a "proportioning valve" then would it? What you're referring to is a check valve, and while I can't say they don't exist on other cars or trucks, after having to deal with many wheel cylinder failures and the resulting cleanup, it's safe to say that such hardware doesn't exist on 70's Ford F-series trucks, which is what we are discussing here.
X2 with all of that. There is zero ck valve in the prop. v! I have used two, one new from Ford for $240, and it did zip to stop one side of reservoir from draining.
I have to say that I am severely disappointed with the Caddy calipers. Although the ebrake seems to clamp when I turn wheel with it up on jack, rolling down the driveway it does nothing!! It won't even stop the truck from idling forward in gear. Now I see first hand why most people go for the supior stopping power of the chevy front caliper. If the ebrake does nothing, why not sell these Caddy calipers on ebay, and go with the chevy ones for $18 ea.
There is one thing that is left out in that article: The booster for the 78 has a short connecting rod. However, with the pre 78 F series trucks, the boost rod is long and connects directly to the b. pedal. So, to use the 78 booster/master in a pre 78 F, you need the pivot bracket which sits between the booster and firewall. That bracket has an arm attached. You connect the short rod of the 78 booster to the pivot, and the arm on the bracket to the b.pedal. W/o the pivot bracket it is impossible.
I'm curious about why you used caddy calipers. You got a pic if them you can post? I've seen Chebby guys use GM front calipers on Dana 60 rears and had no trouble at all.
Anyone looking to do the dana 60 conversion, who wants to have an ebrake, is familiar with the 76-78 Caddy caliper. Most of the kits that have an ebrake use this caliper.
If you do a search on adjusting el dorado calipers you'll find all sorts of info. Classicbroncos.com has a great tech article regarding this caliper. I know there have been many guys who have had problems with them, but I thought I could rebuild my own and make sure they were done correctly, and maintain an ebrake.
Search this forum for ebrake with disc conversion, and you'll read everything I went through...the complete rebuild with photos.
I put the booster from my 76 F-250 4x4 crew cab into my dad's 79 F-250 4x4 reg cab after his developed a leak and the thing will stand up on it's nose now! About throws me through the windshield! I had to use the pushrod from my crew, but it bolted right up no problems.
I took the vacuum booster out of the crew to install hydroboost, and now the crew will easily lock all four thirty fives.
Now, if the prop valves on these trucks worked like you suggest, then whenever wheel cylinders fail, the appropriate reservoir in the master cylinder shouldn't drain until it's empty, but it does. But if it did, it wouldn't be a "proportioning valve" then would it? What you're referring to is a check valve, and while I can't say they don't exist on other cars or trucks, after having to deal with many wheel cylinder failures and the resulting cleanup, it's safe to say that such hardware doesn't exist on 70's Ford F-series trucks, which is what we are discussing here.
As I understand it, the safety valve was mandated way back in the 1960's or early 1970's. All vehicles made in the USA had to have them after that. If you can't get your brakes to bleed after a problem check the pin sticking out of the front of the valve it will be sticking out, push it back in and pump slowly. All Dentsides came from the factory with them there are no exceptions.
As I understand it, the safety valve was mandated way back in the 1960's or early 1970's. All vehicles made in the USA had to have them after that. If you can't get your brakes to bleed after a problem check the pin sticking out of the front of the valve it will be sticking out, push it back in and pump slowly. All Dentsides came from the factory with them there are no exceptions.
You're going to have to illustrate your point with examples. I've never had a problem getting brakes to bleed, and I've fixed probably thousands of wheel cylinder failures and other brake system failures that resulted in massive fluid leaks, and nothing stopped them as you describe. I was a Ford-Certified dealership technician for 12 years and I'm ASE Certified in Brakes and ABS systems currently. I was also a licensed Virginia and North Carolina State Automotive Safety Inspector. What you are describing is a safety function built into the master cylinder by having two circuits. If one circuit has a failure, it doesn't affect the other, but fluid still leaks. RWD vehicles are split front and rear, FWD vehicles brake circuits are diagonal.
The "pin" that you're talking about doesn't work as you describe. It's a metering valve, not a safety valve.