When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Math is one story, but the truth is that electric motors have very high efficiency, so you should start with about 98%. Still the belt running alternator would cut it pretty drastically.
Read my previous post again. In diesel sedan engine fan is not necessary. Sure I didn't go this season to 125F desert, but I drove my car fast in 100's.
Well, how about using the EGR cooler design cue. Make a heat exchanger where hot engine coolant passes thru a manifold that is chilled by the A/C system. Get rid of the radiator all together and just have a chiller.
You still need to rob engine HP but maybe the heat exchanger could be engineered to be more efficient than the traditional radiator/fan.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that if Ford could have figured out how to get the necessary cooling with an electric fan and gained even just a 1 MPG gain that they would have?
Especially considering the fairly complex vistronic fan clutch and sensor that they used instead.
If they could have done it, they would have saved money per truck, which adds up, and they would have been able to claim higher MPG to the EPA and on the sticker and in ads, etc.
You are giving too much credit to Ford. My son drives 1987 Mercedes diesel sedan. Per comparison to my 99 Ford, the sedan is well advanced vehicle.
It only lacks cupholders.
Has it ever occurred to anyone that if Ford could have figured out how to get the necessary cooling with an electric fan and gained even just a 1 MPG gain that they would have?
Especially considering the fairly complex vistronic fan clutch and sensor that they used instead.
If they could have done it, they would have saved money per truck, which adds up, and they would have been able to claim higher MPG to the EPA and on the sticker and in ads, etc.
If they could have done it, they would have.
Never, ever, underestimate the power the bean counters have! Especially in large American corporations!
Pinto. Need I say more?
Speaking as an engineer, I can say the hardest thing in the world is getting the best design to market.... EVERY other member on the "committee" has their own goal and (secret) agenda and NEED to force compromises to the design just to make their point. Harumph.
Math is one story, but the truth is that electric motors have very high efficiency, so you should start with about 98%. Still the belt running alternator would cut it pretty drastically.
Read my previous post again. In diesel sedan engine fan is not necessary. Sure I didn't go this season to 125F desert, but I drove my car fast in 100's.
98%? If you have some of those, I want them!
50 to 85% is typical for the DC motors I can afford.
For the record, 50 to 65% is typical for consumer alternators.
Never, ever, underestimate the power the bean counters have! Especially in large American corporations!
Pinto. Need I say more?
Speaking as an engineer, I can say the hardest thing in the world is getting the best design to market.... EVERY other member on the "committee" has their own goal and (secret) agenda and NEED to force compromises to the design just to make their point. Harumph.
Right... And if the engineers went to the bean counters and said they could get a MPG gain with a simpler (less expensive) design, I'm sure the bean counters wouldn't want to have anything to do with it.
50 to 85% is typical for the DC motors I can afford.
For the record, 50 to 65% is typical for consumer alternators.
98 % efficiency seems to be laboratory results, but 90% becomes pretty standard.
Electric locomotives benefit from the high efficiency of electric motors, often above 90%. Additional efficiency can be gained from regenerative braking
Ahh, those motors. Unfortunately, those are an extreme, and quite expensive. The ones used in typical consumer applications are in the 50 to 85% range. I'd GUESS the ones used in aftermarket fans would fall around 60% at best...
Similar to alternator/generators. The massive ones (with permanent magnets) used in power plants can reach 98%, but the ones small and affordable enough for cars are down iaround 50 to 65%.
Generously assuming 60% and 60% efficiency, the mechanical to electrical conversion is 36% at best.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.