Well, that reveal didn't really reveal much at all. The absence of the ex. cab is a real downer. I had a '98 4x4 ex. cab that was one of the best trucks I ever owned. Come to think of it, I wish I had it back. Doesn't mention anything about powertrain but I'd guess maybe the ecoboost 4 banger. The bad thing is that they say it'll be a smaller cab. If it gets much smaller, it'll be a one seater. I really wish they'd upsize a little like the Dakota. With the powertrain technology they're coming out with like the ecoboost in the Taurus and the Flex, I think they'd be pretty close to being in line with the MPGs they're getting now. A little tweaking and they could probably do even better.
__________________ John
2005 F-250 SD Lariat CC 4x4 6.0 TS Auto.
2007 GMC Yukon Denali
So, if there is no ext. cab, what is the point? The ext. cab, which my dad used to have a LONG time ago, was amazing. 95% of the Rangers I see are ext. cabs. I was hoping for the current international Ranger to come over stateside. I was hoping for all 3 cab configurations. So is this supposed to be a ute like the AU Falcon Ute or the SA Courier?
I really like my standard cab on my '99..I get the 7' box, which you don't get with the ext. cab..Don't know how many times that box has come in handy....
__________________
'99 Ranger XLT Sport (LB) Amazon Green
2.5L, M5OD, 3.73, 133,400
'07 Escape XLS 2.3L (FWD) Auto. 59,000 (Wifes)
It would really make me happy if the new domestic Ranger would be an incarnation of the World Ranger. But if it isn't and it has a smaller cab that's not neccessarily a bad thing. Good engineering and ergonomics can overcome size restraints. I think about a Suzuki Sidekick owned back in the 90's. It had a very narrow cabin and you literally sat in a well but it was actually quite comfortable and spacious enough-and I'm six feet tall and 190#.What would be a terrible disappointment would be to not include the turbodiesel powerplant found in the World Ranger in our new domestic Ranger. Ford has a fantastic opportunity to not only knock one out of the park and get a huge leap ahead of the competition, but also to dramatically increase the fleet fuel economy average simply by utilizing a powerplant they already have developed. It's a no-brainer!
It would really make me happy if the new domestic Ranger would be an incarnation of the World Ranger. But if it isn't and it has a smaller cab that's not neccessarily a bad thing. Good engineering and ergonomics can overcome size restraints. I think about a Suzuki Sidekick owned back in the 90's. It had a very narrow cabin and you literally sat in a well but it was actually quite comfortable and spacious enough-and I'm six feet tall and 190#.What would be a terrible disappointment would be to not include the turbodiesel powerplant found in the World Ranger in our new domestic Ranger. Ford has a fantastic opportunity to not only knock one out of the park and get a huge leap ahead of the competition, but also to dramatically increase the fleet fuel economy average simply by utilizing a powerplant they already have developed. It's a no-brainer!
Utilizing the World Ranger would be the most likely of scenarios from what I am gathering. I have a feeling that the Ranger is a little secret Ford is keeping from us about the whole globalized company ordeal with products such as the Ford Fiesta, Focus, and I believe the S-Max vehicles. I believe that the 2011 Ranger is in heavy consideration for a globalized vehicle here in the States. Especially with Ford 4Trac concept over in Thailand recently. It is very similar to the current Ranger that is found in Asia and Europe. Plus the fact that Ford loves to boast the Ranger's fuel efficiency and would not want that title taken. In my opinion, it just seems to fit together that way, but I could be completely wrong.
Utilizing the World Ranger would be the most likely of scenarios from what I am gathering. I have a feeling that the Ranger is a little secret Ford is keeping from us about the whole globalized company ordeal with products such as the Ford Fiesta, Focus, and I believe the S-Max vehicles. I believe that the 2011 Ranger is in heavy consideration for a globalized vehicle here in the States. Especially with Ford 4Trac concept over in Thailand recently. It is very similar to the current Ranger that is found in Asia and Europe. Plus the fact that Ford loves to boast the Ranger's fuel efficiency and would not want that title taken. In my opinion, it just seems to fit together that way, but I could be completely wrong.
What you're saying makes good sense. I've always wondered why Ford and the rest of the Big Three didn't do more of this over the years. It makes a lot more sense. Even if it was just the platforms as they are doing with some products.
__________________ John
2005 F-250 SD Lariat CC 4x4 6.0 TS Auto.
2007 GMC Yukon Denali
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.
