Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 1997 - 2003 F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage SPONSORED BY:

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-25-2008, 12:48 AM
zuikoman zuikoman is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 121
zuikoman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Tire size 255/70R16 to 265/75R16

I have stock rims on my 2001 F-150 (RWD) with 255/70R16s on there now. Anyone know if 265/75R16s will work as replacements? I know they'll fit just fine on the rims but I'm not sure if I will run into any problems with clearance. I guess the sidewall is 0.8" taller and the tread is 0.39" wider than the ones I have on there now. Seems like that wouldn't be enough to cause problems, but anyone know for sure?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:24 AM
bowdog bowdog is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 174
bowdog is starting off with a positive reputation.
they will fit, in fact you could go to 285,s with no problem
__________________
1998 F150 XLT 4x4 4.6 Liter
Dynomax Catback Exhaust, Dual Exit Out the Rear
Alpine HeadUnit with 4 Polk Audio 6x8
Tonneau Cover
107,000 Miles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2008, 07:42 PM
97Handshaker's Avatar
97Handshaker 97Handshaker is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 435
97Handshaker is starting off with a positive reputation.
^ i agree. 285's will fit just fine too.

my truck came stock with 265's
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:03 PM
galaxie641 galaxie641 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 4,462
galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Actually if he has 2wd 265's are about the limit.
__________________
'51 F3 Flat8
'64 Galaxie 352 4bbl
'72 F250 400/C6
'08 CVPI
'09 F150 5.4L
'10 Mustang GT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:35 PM
Bobby82490's Avatar
Bobby82490 Bobby82490 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: N. Fort Myers,FL
Posts: 1,466
Bobby82490 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
On a 2wd use 265s if you want no rubbing, and you can use 285s if you dont mind some rubbing. I have 285 Duelers on my truck now, and it rubs a little on the sway bar while turning, and it rubs the top of the fenders some if I bottom the truck out.
__________________
-Gone with the 250,000+ '98 F-150
-2002 FX4 Lariet F-150
-5.4/4r70w, 3.55LS, 130,000m
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2008, 09:18 PM
bowdog bowdog is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 174
bowdog is starting off with a positive reputation.
What kind of gas milage do you get with the 265's. I am about ready for new tires and was thinking about going to 265 or 285's ?

Let me know
__________________
1998 F150 XLT 4x4 4.6 Liter
Dynomax Catback Exhaust, Dual Exit Out the Rear
Alpine HeadUnit with 4 Polk Audio 6x8
Tonneau Cover
107,000 Miles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2008, 12:59 AM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco 78bigbronco is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,700
78bigbronco is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I went from 265 to 285 no real mpg difference, at least not more than the normal variance I get. Now I am driving 80mi on the hwy each day I am thinking about putting the 265's on again just to double check if i get any better or worse mpg.
__________________

09 F-350 V10 4x4 6spd CC/8' ordered 5/26/09 delivered 7/6/09
99 F-150 V6 4x4 5spd RegCab/Short bed
78 Big Bronco 4x4 (a work in progress)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2008, 09:32 AM
galaxie641 galaxie641 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 4,462
galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.galaxie641 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I went from 285's to 265's mainly because they cost too much to keep running 33's and I was breaking sway bar links and warping front rotors as well as eating front brakes with the 285's. I noticed more downshifting with the 285's, my effective gear ratio was something like 3.07 with them but my mileage stayed pretty much the same as with 265's.
__________________
'51 F3 Flat8
'64 Galaxie 352 4bbl
'72 F250 400/C6
'08 CVPI
'09 F150 5.4L
'10 Mustang GT
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:05 PM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco 78bigbronco is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,700
78bigbronco is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Wow galaxie sounds like you ran into some probs. The only problem I had was breaking the sway bar end links but I attribute that to cranking up the torsion bars all the way. But to be honest with the bilstein shocks and the cranked torsion bars it rides smoother without the end links and has less roll than the truck did factory. I havent had end links in over 2 years. Havent touched any brakes since long before the swap to 285s and I have had the Kumho MTs on for about 3 years and 35k miles so far. Dont know if the 2wd components are lighter duty though. I am expecting higher bearing wear, but hopefully will have a new truck before thats a problem.
__________________

09 F-350 V10 4x4 6spd CC/8' ordered 5/26/09 delivered 7/6/09
99 F-150 V6 4x4 5spd RegCab/Short bed
78 Big Bronco 4x4 (a work in progress)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2008, 01:36 PM
Ben34's Avatar
Ben34 Ben34 is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 83
Ben34 is starting off with a positive reputation.
This is the exact swap that I did. 265's in my opinion look so much better then the 255's. I have not had them rub at all and don't really notice much gas mileage difference. It's not like any of us are getting 30 mpg's anyway. It's a truck. mine's a 2wd v-6 manual.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2008, 01:36 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2001 Expedition tires P or LT? help pls! one-mind-any-weapon Expedition & Navigator 10 01-17-2014 11:17 PM
p265/75/R16 on stock ranger 06WhiteSport Ranger & B-Series 18 10-14-2006 02:19 AM
Speedometer Adjustment Ben34 1997 - 2003 F150 7 04-20-2005 06:50 PM
[IMPORTANT!] Tires.. Buying Now StorminTexan 3.8 & 4.2L V6 4 07-01-2004 07:43 PM
265/75r16? 255/85r16? Which size would be better? Frdbuy8589 1997 - 2003 F150 2 12-17-2003 09:28 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 1997 - 2003 F150

Tags
1997, 1998, 255, 25570r16, 26575r16, 2wd, 70, alternate, bigger, f150, r16, size, sizes, tire, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


Participate In The Forums

Create new posts and participate in discussions. It's free!

Sign Up »





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup