has anyone ever turbocharged/supercharged a stock 2.8 before

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-16-2008, 04:41 PM
cooked's Avatar
cooked
cooked is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question has anyone ever turbocharged/supercharged a stock 2.8 before

Just wondering how boost a stock Ford 2.8L v6 can handle? In my parts collections I have a M90 eaton supercharger that I was planning on using a turbo regal draw through 4bbl carb intake and I also have two small Mitsubishi turbo's off of a Dodge 2.5L turbo which would be I feel the ideal size. I dont what a 300hp screamer just make a 200-225hp daily driver. I have seen pictures somewhere of a old Ak Miller draw through setup, but I would much rather have a blow through with a intercooler. What would be the better setup
 
  #2  
Old 09-13-2008, 04:38 PM
10strokin's Avatar
10strokin
10strokin is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

turbo 2.8 capri's were offered from the factory in europe for a few years in the 70's. there are a few videos on youtube. yes, if the factory did it, it must be reliable.
 
  #3  
Old 09-15-2008, 04:58 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I've heard of some people pushing as much as 350+ HP out of 2.9s, so I'd imagine the 2.8 could handle 200-225HP just fine.
 
  #4  
Old 09-16-2008, 11:24 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan
TigerDan is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 12,169
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I once rode in a Sunbeam Alpine with a turbo'd 2.8...wicked fast! I don't recall how much boost he was using and I'd hesitate to guess at it...it was years ago. I think I have some pics of his setup around here someplace.

My preferance is for draw-through so you don't have to modify the carb to handle blow-through, but with an intercooler in the setup, then the intake tract winds up being an awfully long route for the atomized fuel to travel from the carb to the intake and I believe I read somewhere that there's a tendancy for the fuel mixture to condense inside the intercooler, so a blow-through setup may be a better bet in this case.

Me, I'd go with EFI. Build a 2.9 instead of a 2.8 or adapt an aftermarket fuel injection system to the 2.8.
 
  #5  
Old 09-17-2008, 09:28 PM
capridude's Avatar
capridude
capridude is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Consider 200 hp as a maximum, due to inherent flaws in the V6 design. Even the Aston
Martin Tickford Capri 2.8 put out only 230hp.
The Micheal May turbos in Europe utilised the smaller version of the 2.8, the 2.3 V6.
These 2.3's put out 180hp:
Die sanfte Gewalt mit Turbo-May Aufladung

Cheers, Jeff
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BTclassics
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
06-07-2017 06:19 PM
716F150
2004 - 2008 F150
14
10-13-2015 07:38 PM
LRWC
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
11-15-2012 12:54 PM
neags
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
2
08-24-2012 05:30 PM
Roadrhino
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
8
03-21-2002 11:13 AM



Quick Reply: has anyone ever turbocharged/supercharged a stock 2.8 before



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.