Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register - Join us, its Free! Albums FAQ Members Tech Guides Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read VendorsUsed CarsGarage
Welcome to Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 04:41 PM
cooked cooked is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
cooked is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question has anyone ever turbocharged/supercharged a stock 2.8 before

Just wondering how boost a stock Ford 2.8L v6 can handle? In my parts collections I have a M90 eaton supercharger that I was planning on using a turbo regal draw through 4bbl carb intake and I also have two small Mitsubishi turbo's off of a Dodge 2.5L turbo which would be I feel the ideal size. I dont what a 300hp screamer just make a 200-225hp daily driver. I have seen pictures somewhere of a old Ak Miller draw through setup, but I would much rather have a blow through with a intercooler. What would be the better setup
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2008, 04:38 PM
10strokin 10strokin is offline
Senior User
1979 Ford F-350
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 321
10strokin is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile

turbo 2.8 capri's were offered from the factory in europe for a few years in the 70's. there are a few videos on youtube. yes, if the factory did it, it must be reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2008, 04:58 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,398
Lead Head has a great reputation on FTE.Lead Head has a great reputation on FTE.Lead Head has a great reputation on FTE.Lead Head has a great reputation on FTE.Lead Head has a great reputation on FTE.
I've heard of some people pushing as much as 350+ HP out of 2.9s, so I'd imagine the 2.8 could handle 200-225HP just fine.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-16-2008, 11:24 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
1968 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,506
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
I once rode in a Sunbeam Alpine with a turbo'd 2.8...wicked fast! I don't recall how much boost he was using and I'd hesitate to guess at it...it was years ago. I think I have some pics of his setup around here someplace.

My preferance is for draw-through so you don't have to modify the carb to handle blow-through, but with an intercooler in the setup, then the intake tract winds up being an awfully long route for the atomized fuel to travel from the carb to the intake and I believe I read somewhere that there's a tendancy for the fuel mixture to condense inside the intercooler, so a blow-through setup may be a better bet in this case.

Me, I'd go with EFI. Build a 2.9 instead of a 2.8 or adapt an aftermarket fuel injection system to the 2.8.
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2008, 09:28 PM
capridude capridude is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Central Valley
Posts: 28
capridude is starting off with a positive reputation.
Consider 200 hp as a maximum, due to inherent flaws in the V6 design. Even the Aston
Martin Tickford Capri 2.8 put out only 230hp.
The Micheal May turbos in Europe utilised the smaller version of the 2.8, the 2.3 V6.
These 2.3's put out 180hp:
Die sanfte Gewalt mit Turbo-May Aufladung

Cheers, Jeff
Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 09:28 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6

Tags
28, 28l, ak, boost, capri, eaton, ford, handle, miller, stock, supercharged, supercharger, truck, turbo, v6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup