What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
#1
#3
#4
What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
Agreed with Merc... There are an abundance of cranks out there, many of which can be found still in STD size... remember, the more meat you have round your mains, hte stronger hte crank will be... I mean, 10/10 doesnt significantly weaken the crank, considering the large portion of metal there already, but still.. More is better, any way you look at it.
Most of the cranks out there can be found for really reasonable prices, too... like under a hundred dollars, for example.. I know my local machine shop sells reconned cranks, already prepped and ground and polished for 190 bucks..10/10 under and polished. Look around, they are out there, but yea... definitely try and find another one instead of using that one AGAIN..
best of luck to ya....
J/.c
1965 Ford Galaxie 500 (okay, so not quite a truck)
ANOTHER 460/C6 @ 365hp/519 lb.ft.
14.36@100.4, 16-18 mpg AHHAAAHAAAHAAA!
Most of the cranks out there can be found for really reasonable prices, too... like under a hundred dollars, for example.. I know my local machine shop sells reconned cranks, already prepped and ground and polished for 190 bucks..10/10 under and polished. Look around, they are out there, but yea... definitely try and find another one instead of using that one AGAIN..
best of luck to ya....
J/.c
1965 Ford Galaxie 500 (okay, so not quite a truck)
ANOTHER 460/C6 @ 365hp/519 lb.ft.
14.36@100.4, 16-18 mpg AHHAAAHAAAHAAA!
#5
What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
The main and rod journals on a 460 crank are 3" and 2.5" respectively. If you can't take a lousy .040 off of that, then those cranks are total junk. A 428 crank has more stroke than a 460 and the main and rod journals are 2.749 and 2.438 respectively. So, by the ".030 is too much" logic, a standard 428 crank is way too thin. One other thing, they take a lot more than .040 off of a crank when they make a stroker. Just my .02
Kevin
Kevin
#6
What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
The main and rod journals on a 460 crank are 3" and 2.5" respectively. If you can't take a lousy .040 off of that, then those cranks are total junk. A 428 crank has more stroke than a 460 and the main and rod journals are 2.749 and 2.438 respectively. So, by the ".030 is too much" logic, a standard 428 crank is way too thin. One other thing, they take a lot more than .040 off of a crank when they make a stroker. Just my .02
Kevin
Kevin
Bob
'66 7 Litre, top loader, 3.25 Traction-lock, Sidewinder Intake, SCJ Exhaust
'88 F150 LWB 4x2, XLT Lariat, 302, 5 speed, 3.08
'99 Ranger, 4x2, 3.0, 5 speed, 3.73 posi
#7
What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
Hey, what about this....when you turn the rod journals .040, and the mains .040, doesnt this throw the entire rotating assembly out of balance? The thicker bearings wont make up for the lost weight because cast iron is denser (heavier) than the steel shells on the bearings. Just wondered
btw, I ran my truck yesterday for the first time since I built the new 460, I was proud to see a 11.17 on the very first pass, with no jetting, timing, no tuning at all! Talk about torque with a capital "t"...lol
btw, I ran my truck yesterday for the first time since I built the new 460, I was proud to see a 11.17 on the very first pass, with no jetting, timing, no tuning at all! Talk about torque with a capital "t"...lol
Trending Topics
#8
What's the limit on turning a 460 crank?
Mavman, since all weight that is taken off any point the crank is matched by weight removed 180 degrees across, the center of gravity of the crank should not be changed. Hence no balance problems in turning rods or mains provided they are all turned equally.
I have seen some abortion rebuilt small blocks where some rod throws were turned .030, others .010. That is nuts.
I have seen some abortion rebuilt small blocks where some rod throws were turned .030, others .010. That is nuts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JPMallory
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
27
06-09-2017 01:01 PM