Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2010 4.4L Ford Diesel
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

2010 4.4L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming 4.4L Ford diesel engine





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 01:55 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 679
mikedeason is starting off with a positive reputation.
Arrow Ford Developing a New Diesel.....QUICKLY

Not sure if this has already been posted but here you go.

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/27/ford-developing-new-diesel-engine-quickly/
   

Last edited by mikedeason : 04-06-2007 at 01:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 02:16 PM
Rizvi54's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockford Illinois
Posts: 237
Rizvi54 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
"Super Duty's that perform romban candle impressions"
It amazes me that these engines got to production before anyone realized they had this severe of a defect. V10 sales are going to be up for awhile!
__________________
2003 F350 Lariat CC 6.0L Dually
2001 F250 Lariat CC V10 SOLD
Become a supporter!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 02:20 PM
kcidmil's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 138
kcidmil is starting off with a positive reputation.
makes me glad I went with the ole reliable 7.3L
__________________
~Fight Back This Year, Do Your Tax Return in Roman Numerals~

00 F-250 XLT 7.3L, 6 Spd 4x4, 3.73
2.5" Cage Offroad Leveling kit
16x10 Ion Alloy 165
Super Swamper Truxus A/T 35"s
www.cardomain.com/id/kcidmil
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 02:42 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 324
NorCalBusa is starting off with a positive reputation.
I dunno if it's so sensational news...just seems prudent decision making to me.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 03:00 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,488
dkf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Ford and Navistar try to squeeze as much profit possible out of there products. To do this no doubt inferior parts were introduced into the mix.

The new emmissions BS are to blame for the 6.4 problems. Read the latest edition of "diesel power" mag and they covered the new emmissions crap on the Fords, Chevys and Dodges, talk about restrictive. A true cluster edit of parts.

To clean out the sulfer and crap from the particulate filters (cats) they ramp up the EGTs to burn off the crap so it doesn't clog the cats. This elevated EGT is no doubt the root of the "Roman Candle" thing.

$8000 extra for a 6.4, No thanks.

You are going to see mor V10s on the lot.

Last edited by Beast12 : 04-07-2007 at 09:44 AM. Reason: changed f*&K to EDIT
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 03:10 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So Oregon
Posts: 1,354
Ace! is starting off with a positive reputation.
Only problem with that is they'll probably make it a $1000 option instead of a $600 option. The V10 is probably a great alternative for most people.
__________________
2005 F250 V10, CC, SB, 4x4, 4.30 axle ratio

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it"
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 04:58 PM
suzuki0702's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 400
suzuki0702 is starting off with a positive reputation.
1000 isnt a bad price for a v10 upgrade imho...v12 possible in the future? lol that would be nuts!
__________________
2004 F250 CrewCab, FX4 Off-road, 5.4, 3.73, K&N FIPK, IMCO dual 3" performance exhaust, Jensen 7" TFT flipout touchscreen
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 05:05 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,265
PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.
The only thing that is funny is the word "quickly". "Quickly" would mean 2010 at the earliest.

As far as the V10 goes, it could be easily replaced by the up and coming 6.2L V8. It is not cost effective to keep around a engine and only use it in one platform. So I would not expect the V10 to be around all that much longer.
__________________
'04 F-250 Harley-Davidson 6.0L CC SB

Last edited by PowerStrokeHD : 04-06-2007 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 05:13 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
JEEPSTER401 is starting off with a positive reputation.
6.4

8,000 for the diesel you must be at the wrong dealer, mine wasn't near that much. I think that if Ford was to build their own diesel and build it fast it would be a bad idea. It would take a wile to properly design, manufacture and test a GOOD deisel engine. If you thought the 6.0 litre launch was bad you just wait.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 05:23 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,111
92f150I6 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I agree with jeepster. Ford making it's own diesel is a good thing, but doning it quickly is bad. Evidence of that would be the 350 GM diesel.
__________________
2003 F250 SD 4X4 5.4L 4:10 Arizona Beige
1987 Mustang GT
A bunch of motorcycles, other cars, and a Quad.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 06:10 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,488
dkf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The V10 is used in F Series, E-Series, Motorhomes as well as Industrial Generators and I'm sure I missed some applications. So there is not just one platform that the V10 is being put in.

So your saying the 5.4 will not be around much longer either since both were introduced at roughly the same time (Mid 90's)

If the EPA has anything to say about it we will all be driving little puddle jumpers like in Europe. It cracks me up we need to save the enviroment by reducing emmisions in our autos (Good to a certain extent) meanwhile our overpaid EPA buddies are cruising in their hybrids and sitting at home heating a 8000sq.ft. home for 2 people to live in. Yep makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 06:13 PM
Fordbronco69's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lake Geneva WI
Posts: 785
Fordbronco69 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wouldnt you all be suprised if they made some badass, cummins eating motor for the SD!! I say go for it Ford!
__________________
To Gain Somthing You Have To Lose Somthing...Usually Your Green $$

2000 F250 SD SC 7.3L 4x4 6Spd 35" Mud Km's, 6 Pos Chip, Hp Luk Clutch, Dual exhaust, Kwik filter....PMS!!!
1974 F250 4x4 C6 35" Mud KM's
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 06:19 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,488
dkf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
6.7l Cummins only rates at 305hp and 605lb. ft. but its compliant to 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 07:58 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,265
PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.PowerStrokeHD has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf
So your saying the 5.4 will not be around much longer either since both were introduced at roughly the same time (Mid 90's)
Actually I do not believe that the 5.4L will be around much longer. The inital 6.2L motor will be a 2V. But they also plan on using the same block destroked to 5.8L as the base motor for the '09 Mustang GT. Plus future versions of the motor using the same block will come in 2V, 3V, and 4V variations, ranging from 5.8L to 7.0L. Some additional features will also include cylinder deactivation and direct injection. With the potential of this new motor I just do not see much of a future for the current modular motors.
__________________
'04 F-250 Harley-Davidson 6.0L CC SB
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007, 08:13 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 146
swanee is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm pretty sure that the 305 H.P. and 605 torque are for the chassis cabs. The regular trucks are supposed to be 325 H.P. and 650 torque just like ours.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy