Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Ford Vans and other vehicles > Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-03-2006, 08:49 PM
randy64 randy64 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3
randy64 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351w in a 69 chero

What problems might I run into swapping the 302 in a 1969 Ranchero with a 351w?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2006, 10:20 PM
85e150six4mtod 85e150six4mtod is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,182
85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation85e150six4mtod has a superb reputation
Seems like that would have been a factory option, so it should be pretty easy.

Little stuff like linkages, radiator hose locations, exhaust manifolds exiting at the correct point might be things to look out for.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2006, 06:00 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim IB Tim is online now
Site Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 114,007
IB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputationIB Tim has a superb reputation
...Welcome Randy to Ford Truck Enthusiasts!

…..See you on the boards.
__________________
Administrator
tim.lamkin@internetbrands dot com
Life is not only time……paradoxically, it is the denial of time!
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.

When you are down...look up...get up...and don't ever give up....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2006, 08:25 AM
ncranchero's Avatar
ncranchero ncranchero is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E.Lincoln County, NC
Posts: 2,798
ncranchero has a good reputation on FTE.ncranchero has a good reputation on FTE.
steve.mckellop
The 302 was the most popular option and you will have no interchange issues at all. Think about going the 5.0HO EFI route, more power and better fuel mileage.
__________________
Steve,
'94 F150 4x4 4.9L/5-speed/3.55(H9) 166K miles
'00 Taurus SES DOHC 87K miles
'02 Escape XLT 3.0/auto 165K miles
'14 TRANSIT Connect
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2006, 10:34 AM
65rancheroguy 65rancheroguy is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Union Grove, Alabama
Posts: 52
65rancheroguy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncranchero
The 302 was the most popular option and you will have no interchange issues at all. Think about going the 5.0HO EFI route, more power and better fuel mileage.
Maybe better mileage, but definitly not more power!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2006, 12:25 PM
ncranchero's Avatar
ncranchero ncranchero is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E.Lincoln County, NC
Posts: 2,798
ncranchero has a good reputation on FTE.ncranchero has a good reputation on FTE.
steve.mckellop
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65rancheroguy
Maybe better mileage, but definitly not more power!
Power of the 351W or the 5.0 HO depends on the year and mods.

With gas @ $3.00 a gal and rising fuel injection is a big plus.
__________________
Steve,
'94 F150 4x4 4.9L/5-speed/3.55(H9) 166K miles
'00 Taurus SES DOHC 87K miles
'02 Escape XLT 3.0/auto 165K miles
'14 TRANSIT Connect

Last edited by ncranchero; 05-08-2006 at 12:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2006, 12:25 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Ford Vans and other vehicles > Ranchero & 1961 - 1967 Econoline

Tags
69, chero

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351w to 351m clutch kit marcoelam 1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1 07-11-2014 02:29 PM
351w heads v10squirrel Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 6 07-10-2007 08:54 PM
351w no start Redneckerson 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 4 03-15-2002 07:49 PM
351m to 351w swap frogger01 Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 3 03-15-2001 06:08 PM
351W & 351C AlM 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco 4 03-12-2000 09:22 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup