4.9 vs 4.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-18-2006, 06:28 PM
jimbo beam's Avatar
jimbo beam
jimbo beam is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hawkeye Country
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
4.9 vs 4.2

theres a guy on the 3.8/4.2 forum page asking about compairing the inline 6 to the v6 in a f150.

for me theres no comparison, the 4.9 is the better engine, for an all out truck engine i'll take my 300 over many others.

just wonder what you guys think, whos better? the 300 our beloved "tractor" engine. or the 4.2, the bored out minivan engine.
 
  #2  
Old 02-18-2006, 07:57 PM
brosko80's Avatar
brosko80
brosko80 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
illtake the 300 by a long shot anyday!
 
  #3  
Old 02-18-2006, 08:16 PM
bks90F150's Avatar
bks90F150
bks90F150 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4.2 wouldn't last in a full-sized truck, especially if you are going to make it work at all. A 4.2 wouldn't be able to pull nearly as well as the 300. There would be too much stress on the engine, shortening the life of the engine. I'd take a 300 any day. Afterall, we're talking about trucks here, not passenger vehicles. That engine has a different purpose.
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2006, 11:28 PM
BigBear1's Avatar
BigBear1
BigBear1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that guy serious? You can't even compare the the 300 to the 4.2. The 300 is so much better. I'll take an inline 6 anyday
 
  #5  
Old 02-19-2006, 01:39 AM
desperado_18_2000's Avatar
desperado_18_2000
desperado_18_2000 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: S. Mississippi
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd still take the 300 over a 4.2. I know the roots of where this engine began with the 3.8...and i'd definately rather not ever have another engine decended from that family.
 
  #6  
Old 02-19-2006, 01:46 AM
RotGrubestier44's Avatar
RotGrubestier44
RotGrubestier44 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by desperado_18_2000
I'd still take the 300 over a 4.2. I know the roots of where this engine began with the 3.8...and i'd definately rather not ever have another engine decended from that family.
NO joke. The 3.8 family is, well, junk, when compaired to the 300. The 300 is the best gas engine for doing work (for a truck) in the world. I've seen them in everything, from dump trucks to pickups, wheel crushers, wood chippers, even a few race cars. You can not convince me otherwise, lol. A wise man once said a real truck engine has 6 cylinders, all in a straight line, and usually without spark plugs. I agree.
 
  #7  
Old 02-19-2006, 03:12 AM
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Col Flashman is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: La Verne, California
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by jimbo beam
theres a guy on the 3.8/4.2 forum page asking about compairing the inline 6 to the v6 in a f150.

for me theres no comparison, the 4.9 is the better engine, for an all out truck engine i'll take my 300 over many others.

just wonder what you guys think, whos better? the 300 our beloved "tractor" engine. or the 4.2, the bored out minivan engine.
300c.i.ers Forever!!!!!
 
  #8  
Old 02-19-2006, 07:03 AM
todd88's Avatar
todd88
todd88 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Jacobus,PA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No comparison -300 is a truck/tractor engine -I've pulled many a V8 out of a ditch. I don't think you could do that with many of those engines, unless you were willing to break something.
 
  #9  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:02 PM
beatupford's Avatar
beatupford
beatupford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Timmins,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4.2 is better than the 300 in a race. I know someone with it in his mustang and its pretty darn quick. But make no mistake, i don't think the 4.2 has a place in a good work truck. You have to haul dead moose out of the bush. You have to cut 15 loads of birch in the spring, well you know, stuff you need a truck for. If you had to decide which engine to put in your truck, not a car, the only two left in the world, where one is a 4.2, or the other a 4.9. What would you pick?
 

Last edited by beatupford; 02-19-2006 at 10:11 PM.
  #10  
Old 02-19-2006, 10:42 PM
brosko80's Avatar
brosko80
brosko80 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.9 all the way (in a truck)
 
  #11  
Old 02-20-2006, 08:34 AM
Motorhead351's Avatar
Motorhead351
Motorhead351 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Work, I'd take the 4.9.


Straight line performance, stock vs stock, the 4.2 no question about it.
 

Last edited by Motorhead351; 02-20-2006 at 08:44 AM.
  #12  
Old 02-20-2006, 03:54 PM
Johnboy_BoomerSooner's Avatar
Johnboy_BoomerSooner
Johnboy_BoomerSooner is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cameron, OK
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask him to try this with a 4.2 and 38x14.50's while still running the stock 3.55 gears.

CKICK FOR VIDEO
 
  #13  
Old 02-20-2006, 06:47 PM
optikal illushun's Avatar
optikal illushun
optikal illushun is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Coal Region
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
johnboy, more videos!
 
  #14  
Old 02-20-2006, 07:26 PM
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Col Flashman is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: La Verne, California
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The 4.2l, will Not hold up as well in the long run.
How many c.i. is that?
I despise the use of Liters for engine displacement.
 
  #15  
Old 02-21-2006, 01:19 AM
Schmids4.9l's Avatar
Schmids4.9l
Schmids4.9l is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bored town OH
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That has to be a joke. The 4.2 couldnt touch the 300 as a truck motor.

Only thing that makes me think is the numbers. The 4.2 makes better numbers than the 302 did (202 hp & i forget the torque @ 4500rpms), and some guys on here seem to think the 302 is a better truck motor than the 300.

Put up a link to that thread, I've gotta give them my input. Our six is more heavy duty than their six.
 


Quick Reply: 4.9 vs 4.2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.