1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage

Tailgate vs. MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-04-2005, 08:45 PM
crw2's Avatar
crw2
crw2 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tailgate vs. MPG

I have always heard that there is a direct relation between MPG and the position of the tailgate.(up vs. down) Has anyone out there done a real comparison? I'm not too lazy to do it myself, I just don't need the tailgate beating my truck to death just to find out that I wasted my time.( no, I dont have anyplace to store it if I take it off.)
 
  #2  
Old 10-04-2005, 09:00 PM
bulrydr_1's Avatar
bulrydr_1
bulrydr_1 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I haven't personally tried it, but I have read reasearch data on the topic. According to the research, modern trucks are enginerred(?) fro max MPG with the tailgate up. They say that the engineers took the drag into account when designing the boy style for aerodynamics. That being aid, the article states that driving around with your tailgate down or removed, will not increase your milage, and may even decrease it because of the enginnering...

Mike
 
  #3  
Old 10-05-2005, 09:05 AM
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
BillyBob69 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wheatland, Mo
Posts: 7,333
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
I saw a show about this and it said the same as bullryder.... With the tailgate up, as you start moving, it creates a "bubble" of air in the bed which then keeps the moving air flowing over and past the bed. With the tailgate down, the air tends to hook the back of the truck and "drag" it causing less MPG. Besides...looks better with the tailgate up.
 
  #4  
Old 10-05-2005, 10:31 AM
tdister's Avatar
tdister
tdister is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: central TX
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 99 Scab short bed doesn't seem to get much turbulence in the bed. Heavier leaves and cigarette butts pretty well stay put. With my ext. cab 98 Dakota, on the other hand, you hit 55 and anything like that in the bed is flying out (probably another reason the f150 gets better mileage). Doubt it will help much on these trucks, maybe on a different configuraton it would...
 
  #5  
Old 10-05-2005, 10:36 AM
MrBSS's Avatar
MrBSS
MrBSS is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does depend on the truck and conditions. I even saw one study where mileage went down with the tailgate removed, but up with it on but down.
 
  #6  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:19 PM
ddrumman2004's Avatar
ddrumman2004
ddrumman2004 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: N. Mississippi
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I owned an 87 Nissan truck where I conducted tests with tailgate up and down back in 1988. The mileage was the same.....up or down on the highway. I managed 25 mpg in that truck until I installed a fiberglas topper. Then the mileage increased to 30 mpg.

I saw on the show "Trucks" back around the same time when it was on TNN that when they raced their Jeep truck....there was no difference in fuel used or time around the track with the tailgate down.

On my 97 F-150 with 4.6 auto.....no difference in mileage either way.

The tailgate is more likely to get damaged in the down position.
 
  #7  
Old 10-05-2005, 12:52 PM
lancekilgore's Avatar
lancekilgore
lancekilgore is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You may be right about modern trucks, I drive with mine off and a net up but I get the same as with the tailgate on. on older trucks with it removed or down I would get a 3 to 5 mpg bettter. guess I'll put the tailgate back on especially since i have to put it on all the time to haul things.

Lance
 
  #8  
Old 10-05-2005, 05:24 PM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco
78bigbronco is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I havent noticed any difference up or down - driven it both ways. I think there is more a difference in the conditions... for example my milleage drops almost 2mpg in the winter versus summer. Or if I drive it a little faster makes a difference. Its really hard in real world driving to to an equal comparison. WOuld have to be the same vehicle and same weight driving in the same conditions (tempeture, barometric pressure, same roads, etc.) and accelerating at the saem amount and cruising the same. Thats like impossible.
 
  #9  
Old 10-05-2005, 07:24 PM
crw2's Avatar
crw2
crw2 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you one and all. I guess that my questions were answered beyond what I had expected.I drive a 97 F-150 4.6 short bed, reg cab...15 MPG is about the max,even with cat back duals and K&n air filter.( these are city miles...never had it on the highway long enough to burn a full tank of gas.)
 
  #10  
Old 10-05-2005, 07:57 PM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco
78bigbronco is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well your doin just as good as me - my city miles usually 14 to 15, 13 in winter. I only have the v6. But from what I gather, 4wd is probably the bigest hit on milleage for factory options (I have a 4wd). The 2wd seem to always get better milleage.
 
  #11  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:04 AM
lancekilgore's Avatar
lancekilgore
lancekilgore is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive both city and highway miles back and forth to work every day get about 17, never had it on the hyway straight, maybe I should but hate to test it with the price of gas. Drove it today first itme 32 degrees. I could tell a difference in driving this morning. tranny shifted later than whenit is warm.

Lance
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.