Stupid Decisions made by FORD
#1
Stupid Decisions made by FORD
Ok, This isnt suicide, but I hate to say that I think that ford has made more stupid decsions than GM, I'm not sure about Mopar though. My all time favorite was the Lightning is only available in automatic. Thats just seems really dumb. There was also the Pinto, and the Four cyl. Stang. Whats been your favorite.
#3
I don't agree that the Pinto was a mistake. My family had owned a few of them and they were great little cars. I do agree with the 4cyl 'Stang, although technically Ford is in the business of SELLING cars, and the little Mustang II was a hot seller. Guess it depends on how you look at it.
#5
Automatics are more consistent on the quarter mile and can handle more abuse than a clutch. All car companies had slow cars in the mid 70s, that doesn't make it ford's fault. The only dumb decision that they made with the pinto was to not recall the gas tank. All GM does is make mistakes (Aztek, build quality, any Camaro between 73 and the mid 80's IROC). GMC = Great Mistake Company.
#7
pito's were cool little ride's better w/302 in them think about tho they run cheap insuance was cheap parts are cheap and ya'll could park them anywhere.i realy think tho that discontinuing the 300 definetly was a mistake.i just keep my ol junk runnin forever if it dosent have a carb it isnt in my driveway.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
#11
#12
Originally Posted by Budly
The 2 biggest mistakes, the end discontinuance of the 7.3 PSD and the 4.9 I6
The capri was ugly but with a 302 it was a blast light to light.
Dont they use pintos for crash derbies cause they are indestructable. Also ramblers. Isnt pinto a mexican slang word.
#13
#14
I think the worst decisions Ford has made was to neglect their car lines. With trucks, they do great, but they're only now beginning to address the car part of their business.
*They blew it with the oval-designed Taurus, and lost the sales lead they had.
*They kept the Fox body platform around too long. The '05 Mustang redesign should have happened five years ago.
*They have neglected Mercury. If they don't seperate it more from similar Ford models, it will join Plymouth and Oldsmobile in the history books.
*They went the wrong way with the redesigned Towncar. They should have kept a boxier look.
*There's no Mark IX.
*They should have kept the Cougar as a RWD Coupe.
*Cadillac is making a come-back...Lincoln better come up with new models or they will forever be geezermobiles.
I think the Pintos were great little cars, and right for the time. I had two of them, and they both did the job quite well. They were definately better than Vegas. They had one of the smoothest shifting 4 speeds around, were inexpensive, dependable and economical. The exploding gas tank thing was overblown, IMO. Any small car that was wacked in the rear by a full-sized 1970's car would probably suffer the same fate. It was a-holes like Johnny Carson that made a whipping boy out of the Pinto. After a while the public went along with it...Pinto..Ha Ha. There weren't that many that exploded, and Ford had a recall to correct the problem, but they were still the butt of jokes. If I could find a decent Pinto today, I'd buy it as a daily driver...plus a 302 fits real nice in them.
MR
*They blew it with the oval-designed Taurus, and lost the sales lead they had.
*They kept the Fox body platform around too long. The '05 Mustang redesign should have happened five years ago.
*They have neglected Mercury. If they don't seperate it more from similar Ford models, it will join Plymouth and Oldsmobile in the history books.
*They went the wrong way with the redesigned Towncar. They should have kept a boxier look.
*There's no Mark IX.
*They should have kept the Cougar as a RWD Coupe.
*Cadillac is making a come-back...Lincoln better come up with new models or they will forever be geezermobiles.
I think the Pintos were great little cars, and right for the time. I had two of them, and they both did the job quite well. They were definately better than Vegas. They had one of the smoothest shifting 4 speeds around, were inexpensive, dependable and economical. The exploding gas tank thing was overblown, IMO. Any small car that was wacked in the rear by a full-sized 1970's car would probably suffer the same fate. It was a-holes like Johnny Carson that made a whipping boy out of the Pinto. After a while the public went along with it...Pinto..Ha Ha. There weren't that many that exploded, and Ford had a recall to correct the problem, but they were still the butt of jokes. If I could find a decent Pinto today, I'd buy it as a daily driver...plus a 302 fits real nice in them.
MR