390 rear main seal?
#1
390 rear main seal?
Stiil need some advice on this 68 390 rear main seal leak, not a drip. I did a two piece seal, and didnt offset the joints with the mating surfaces. Will that definitley cause a flowing leak? or is it just a good thing to do? There does not appear to be a score on the crank where the seal rides. new pcv and has vacuum. NOT the oil pan, and at this point I have not pulled the fly wheel for further investigation. People told me loose bearing clearences, and the seal wont be able to do its job. Or, too much blow by increasing the presure and the seal cant hold it back. But my main question is the two piece seal, does it NEED to be offset?? It is just a old work truck that is not worth too much more time, but I would hate to dump it if it is just an easy fix. Any thoughts
#5
If this is a two piece rope seal, then you do not have to offset the pieces. From the factory, they are flat even with the main cap and block surfaces. You can cause a leak by leaving little bits of rope between the cap and block. They, in effect, will increase the bearing clearance, and thus allow more oil to blow past the bearing, sometimes overcoming the seals effectiveness. If the side seal pieces are not pushed in flush with the meeting surface, you can get leaks there, too. If you do the RTV thing, make sure that you have a recess for the RTV to ooze into, but really, you shouldn't need it. The ends of the rope seal can be offset even now, all you have to do is get the upper to move a little, and then do the same amount of rotation of the lower... reassemble and smile at your own trick. tom
#6
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jay Is Jay
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
3
02-22-2017 01:14 PM
shuffster
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
29
06-22-2016 07:47 AM
twom7
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
05-16-2015 08:59 AM
WrenchBuilder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
05-16-2002 03:57 PM