2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

im considering a 2.7 2wd shorty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-24-2015, 08:40 PM
yak's Avatar
yak
yak is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im considering a 2.7 2wd shorty

thinking about picking up a 2.7 ecoboost reg cab 2wd shorty bare bones (
except will need power locks and windows) to replace my 2013 ram 2wd shorty. should a guy wait till they get the 10 speed auto. im in no rush to sell the dodge yet. . how much better on fuel would it be compared to my 4.7 6 speed. I usually get 21 -24 mpg highway with it....

 
  #2  
Old 03-24-2015, 10:22 PM
Ziegelsteinfaust's Avatar
Ziegelsteinfaust
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You'll edge out the Ram on mpg depending on how you drive, but it may not be a large enough difference to justify.

I would wait myself for the 10 speed as the 8 speed works well with the 3.6's nature. At least from the couple of times I got to drive one.

Having spent time looking at both for at the time seemed like a certain purchase. There is not much advantage in any one way that sets Ford apart interior wise in a rc form. Now if you compare GM's twins the Ford has a big interior space advantage.

Either way its up to you as its your money, but I would love to toss down coin on that truck. Just with a long bed.
 
  #3  
Old 03-24-2015, 11:33 PM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd rather keep the money for when I'm old. You already bought a nice new truck recently. Be happy about it.
 
  #4  
Old 03-25-2015, 05:00 PM
1saxman's Avatar
1saxman
1saxman is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,262
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I took a look at the Ford site; the XL regular cab with 5.5' box, 2WD and 2.7 ECOB seems like it would be a fun truck and a total sleeper at the stop light. I would get limited slip diff though. Imagine how that truck would accelerate and handle with the smallest configuration and aluminum body & bed. I'm afraid I should not have looked into that - my '07 is suddenly looking old-fashioned.
 
  #5  
Old 03-25-2015, 08:23 PM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Am I the only one who noticed the over 100 mph reading on speedo
 
  #6  
Old 03-25-2015, 08:28 PM
Gicknordon's Avatar
Gicknordon
Gicknordon is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Birdsboro PA
Posts: 1,885
Received 72 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by CuNmUdF250
Am I the only one who noticed the over 100 mph reading on speedo
100kph, not mph
 
  #7  
Old 03-25-2015, 10:15 PM
CuNmUdF250's Avatar
CuNmUdF250
CuNmUdF250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Didn't even notice that.....so that means he's in Canada? ??
 
  #8  
Old 03-26-2015, 07:49 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,068
Received 441 Likes on 323 Posts
Probably not in Canada, as he's got the temp display in F, and the Cruise Control in Miles.
Maybe a canadian truck found it's way south . . .
 
  #9  
Old 03-26-2015, 03:36 PM
Chad Kirchner's Avatar
Chad Kirchner
Chad Kirchner is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As was already mentioned here, I wouldn't expect a significant difference in fuel economy between your Ram and the 2.7L EcoBoost.

The 2.7L is a peach of an engine though to drive, and feels plenty powerful.

10-speed is a way away yet, since it won't debut until probably the 2017 Raptor. So I guess it'd depend on how long you want to wait.
 
  #10  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:17 PM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Frantz is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,775
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
If I was buying a 2015 F150 to replace my 95 5.8 I'd be happy w the 2.7. That being said, I don't think you'll see a savings advantage over your Dodge. The advantage would be going to an American family owned company vs an Italian one. On paper it wouldn't make sense just yet. Buy if you're not beating up, you'd be looking at a good argument for a lease next time around =-)
 
  #11  
Old 04-03-2015, 02:47 PM
LSchicago2's Avatar
LSchicago2
LSchicago2 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,684
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1saxman
I took a look at the Ford site; the XL regular cab with 5.5' box, 2WD and 2.7 ECOB seems like it would be a fun truck and a total sleeper at the stop light. I would get limited slip diff though. Imagine how that truck would accelerate and handle with the smallest configuration and aluminum body & bed. I'm afraid I should not have looked into that - my '07 is suddenly looking old-fashioned.
Regular cab is not available with the 5.5' bed. The short bed on regular cabs is the 6.5 bed.
 
  #12  
Old 04-18-2015, 05:13 PM
yak's Avatar
yak
yak is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
Probably not in Canada, as he's got the temp display in F, and the Cruise Control in Miles.
Maybe a canadian truck found it's way south . . .
its a Canadian spec truck... from the comments here looks like I might as well stick to dodge
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbohunter
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
05-03-2015 06:14 AM
James_02 f250
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
09-18-2012 01:25 AM
Red460
General Automotive Discussion
3
08-24-2012 11:41 AM
citygator
Alternative Fuels, Hybrids & Mileage
6
04-12-2009 10:03 PM
rhoaiea
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
02-07-2007 06:44 PM



Quick Reply: im considering a 2.7 2wd shorty



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.