2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

last year for a v8 f150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-08-2015, 10:03 PM
yak's Avatar
yak
yak is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
last year for a v8 f150

i'll guess by 2019 ford will only offer v6 engines in the f150....what yous think?
 
  #2  
Old 03-09-2015, 12:28 AM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How do you know this?
 
  #3  
Old 03-09-2015, 12:35 AM
Ancona's Avatar
Ancona
Ancona is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure of the year but I don't think they will offer just a V6. I think they will also offer a super-eco boost 4 cylinder.

Edit: Plus they will have the 10-speed tranny out by then. And they will say you don't really need a V-6 with the 10-speed transmission and that the super-eco boost 4 cylinder has a better torque curve than the n/a V6 anyway.
 
  #4  
Old 03-09-2015, 07:41 AM
LSchicago2's Avatar
LSchicago2
LSchicago2 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,684
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The V8 is not going away in the F150.....
 
  #5  
Old 03-09-2015, 04:47 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,162
Received 1,222 Likes on 804 Posts
As long as the competition offers a V-8, Ford will.

But I would like to know one thing, what will a V-8 do that the ecoboost engines won't?

The whole argument about sound or noise isn't a good reason. I like a throaty sounding truck too but I really like my smooth power and great MPG's.
 
  #6  
Old 03-09-2015, 08:37 PM
yak's Avatar
yak
yak is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LSchicago2
The V8 is not going away in the F150.....
wrong!!!! unless they go back to a pushrod v8 and include cylinder deactivation. likely not going to happen. also a big sign they want to ditch v8s is going with the 600 horse v6 in that gt thing
 
  #7  
Old 03-09-2015, 08:40 PM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Okay, so you don't know. This thread is worthless.
 
  #8  
Old 03-09-2015, 09:00 PM
yak's Avatar
yak
yak is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by QwkTrip
Okay, so you don't know. This thread is worthless.
i do know, i just dont know what year
 
  #9  
Old 03-09-2015, 09:30 PM
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
QwkTrip is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
wrong!!!!

LOL!
 
  #10  
Old 03-09-2015, 10:07 PM
Gicknordon's Avatar
Gicknordon
Gicknordon is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Birdsboro PA
Posts: 1,885
Received 72 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by yak
wrong!!!! unless they go back to a pushrod v8 and include cylinder deactivation. likely not going to happen. also a big sign they want to ditch v8s is going with the 600 horse v6 in that gt thing
The v6 in the GT had nothing to do with ditching the v8. It had everything to do with going racing at leMans. If they really wanted to ditch the V8, would they have spent all the time and money engineering the new 5.2 flat plane crank engine?
 
  #11  
Old 03-09-2015, 10:20 PM
Ranger1980's Avatar
Ranger1980
Ranger1980 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tseekins
As long as the competition offers a V-8, Ford will.

But I would like to know one thing, what will a V-8 do that the ecoboost engines won't?

The whole argument about sound or noise isn't a good reason. I like a throaty sounding truck too but I really like my smooth power and great MPG's.
Not need more computing power than the shuttle and multiple turbos or computers.
 
  #12  
Old 03-09-2015, 11:31 PM
tvsjr's Avatar
tvsjr
tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger1980
Not need more computing power than the shuttle and multiple turbos or computers.
I hate to tell you this, but your cell phone has more computing power than the shuttle. Remember, we put men on the moon with slide rules. The Shuttle, in the last configuration, used 5 AP-101S modules, each with 1MB memory and capable of 1.2 million instructions per second. The iPhone 6 in your pocket has 1000X that much memory (RAM), 64,000X that much storage (flash), and processes 2,083X the instructions per second. Computers are nothing to be scared of, and much of the (really fairly amazing) performance from these trucks is directly attributable to the smarts the engineers have built into these trucks.

Turbos are nothing to be scared of. Almost every large prime mover (think 18-wheelers, up to locomotives, ships, mine trucks, etc.) used a turbocharged motor.

You'd be hard pressed to find a single vehicle manufactured today that doesn't use multiple computers. All F150s, V8 or not, have separate computers for engine, transmission, body, navigation, etc.

I do find it amusing that people say "ZOMG I gotta have a V8!" In reality, you need a powerplant capable of producing enough HP/torque to address your performance and towing needs. That could be a twin-turbo V6 or I6, a V8, or an electric motor driven by batteries or a gas/diesel prime mover. You might *want* a V8 because it "sounds good", but you certainly don't need it.
 
  #13  
Old 03-11-2015, 05:24 PM
LSchicago2's Avatar
LSchicago2
LSchicago2 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,684
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by yak
wrong!!!! unless they go back to a pushrod v8 and include cylinder deactivation. likely not going to happen. also a big sign they want to ditch v8s is going with the 600 horse v6 in that gt thing
"GT thing"? LOL. Glad you are knowledgeable about Ford products. Oh wait.....
 
  #14  
Old 03-11-2015, 06:59 PM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,085
Received 1,565 Likes on 913 Posts
Which Ford GT does Thing drive?

 
  #15  
Old 03-11-2015, 07:42 PM
Smidgy's Avatar
Smidgy
Smidgy is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tseekins
But I would like to know one thing, what will a V-8 do that the ecoboost engines won't?
A lot of variables there, Ecoboost owners defend their motor and rightfully so it is a runner and as far as pure performance nothing.

It does have known issues and some people want to stay clear of it. My two cents worth is that the engine is 4 years old in a truck, it has proved some things, others like longevity and longterm cost of ownership are just starting to be proven.
 


Quick Reply: last year for a v8 f150



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.