Escape & Escape Hybrid Ford Escape, Ford Escape Hybrid, Mercury Mariner, Mazda Tribute

Which Engine Should I choose for a 2015 Escape/

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-13-2014, 11:52 PM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by raytasch
To get the equipment the wife wanted, I had to go with the EB 1.6. Pretty nice little car. So far, so good. Thanks for the input.
Congrats on the new ride, hopefully it will serve you well!
 
  #17  
Old 12-20-2014, 11:48 PM
Tennesseepowerstroke's Avatar
Tennesseepowerstroke
Tennesseepowerstroke is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 998
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Tennesseepowerstroke
The lack of a basic 2.5 liter four cylinder in the Escape or Fusion in a top level trim edition has me looking at other brands. I want something simple to work on and that has very good reliability. I don't consider turbos to be trouble free over the long haul and there is not any room to work under the hood when you have a turbo. I might have possibly purchased my last Ford.
I hate to admit it as I am a Ford retiree, but a new Jeep Wrangler is in the works, for good or bad.
 
  #18  
Old 12-21-2014, 01:47 PM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is offline
Believe Nothing

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,329
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
Originally Posted by Tennesseepowerstroke
I hate to admit it as I am a Ford retiree, but a new Jeep Wrangler is in the works, for good or bad.
Although not the top trim level, the SE can be had with the normally aspirated 2.5 engine. Some dealerships may tell you otherwise. The NA engine may be available in the Titanium, I don't know. Extras on the SE can vary. I wanted the NA engine but had to go with the EB to get leather and 201A pkg, I believe it was. A happy wife was more important than the engine............unless the EB engine makes for an unhappy wife in a year or so.
 
  #19  
Old 12-21-2014, 11:52 PM
Tennesseepowerstroke's Avatar
Tennesseepowerstroke
Tennesseepowerstroke is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 998
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by raytasch
Although not the top trim level, the SE can be had with the normally aspirated 2.5 engine. Some dealerships may tell you otherwise. The NA engine may be available in the Titanium, I don't know. Extras on the SE can vary. I wanted the NA engine but had to go with the EB to get leather and 201A pkg, I believe it was. A happy wife was more important than the engine............unless the EB engine makes for an unhappy wife in a year or so.
I feel your pain. My wife wants leather and you have to take EB to get it. The EB in the new Mustang looks like it would be easy to work on. I don't think I am interested in the EB in the Fusion. The natural aspirated engine is not available in the Fusion unless you want a basic trim level.
 
  #20  
Old 12-25-2014, 06:38 AM
SCUDDOG's Avatar
SCUDDOG
SCUDDOG is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Key West, FL
Posts: 112
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Red face 2.5L is great

Bought the wife a base model with the 2.5L on Valentine's day of this year. White exterior and no options. We both love it. I was leery of the turbo models though I do hear that the 2.0L is a blast to drive. As someone who traded in a vehicle with 239K miles on it's non turbo engine... I kind of prefer non turbo models.

Anyway... we have had NO issues with the 2.5L. It is not fast by any means, but it is smooth and our MPG is pretty darned good on the highway. Around town we are in the low 20s. One of the posts noted that there was not much info to be found on the 2.5L and they were right. It seems that Ford offers this engine in the Escape as a budget buster option only and does not promote it at all. I've only seen a few base models on the road though they continue to sell well. Bizarre. Anyway I think that Ford has hit a home run with the new Escape and the 2.5L model(s) are worth the test drive. Good luck.
 
  #21  
Old 12-25-2014, 08:12 AM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SCUDDOG
Bought the wife a base model with the 2.5L on Valentine's day of this year. White exterior and no options. We both love it. I was leery of the turbo models though I do hear that the 2.0L is a blast to drive. As someone who traded in a vehicle with 239K miles on it's non turbo engine... I kind of prefer non turbo models.

Anyway... we have had NO issues with the 2.5L. It is not fast by any means, but it is smooth and our MPG is pretty darned good on the highway. Around town we are in the low 20s. One of the posts noted that there was not much info to be found on the 2.5L and they were right. It seems that Ford offers this engine in the Escape as a budget buster option only and does not promote it at all. I've only seen a few base models on the road though they continue to sell well. Bizarre. Anyway I think that Ford has hit a home run with the new Escape and the 2.5L model(s) are worth the test drive. Good luck.
If you look this engine up on wiki, it appears to be a mazda design manufactured by ford, was found in the old style fusion and escape, great torquey little engine, not what I would describe as a poverty motor at all, if it came from the 1.8 escort engine, it should be a very high mileage unit. Merry Christmas!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
07 F250 Aggie Mobile
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
2
06-21-2018 08:41 AM
IDPisan
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
10-13-2006 10:01 PM
stockernavstar
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
04-23-2006 08:38 PM
mschultz
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
35
01-12-2006 10:39 AM
ryanben
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
15
06-11-2003 03:18 AM



Quick Reply: Which Engine Should I choose for a 2015 Escape/



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.