Offroad & 4x4
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which tire is better for the mud?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-16-2014, 11:44 AM
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
NW 150 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well looks are playing a factor in the decision I can't deny that. I'll be doing a good bit of work to this truck to make it look half way decent, including painting it sometime this year or next. But the functionality and fitment are my main concerns. So It looks like I'll be going with the 38x12.5" TSL/SX then. For it's height they aren't all that wide or at least I don't consider them to be? Another project for this truck in a couple years will be a 460 with around 400-425 horsepower.
 
  #17  
Old 07-16-2014, 06:41 PM
82F100SWB's Avatar
82F100SWB
82F100SWB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Dryden, ON, Canada
Posts: 5,330
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
My truck is a trail rig, not a hardcore mud machine, and boggers on all 4 corners is the best way to fly with the local terrain. Wide works better here, skinnies always try to find the bottom, but when there isnt one you are toast.

I would go with the lighter ply rating unless you absolutely need the extra weight capacity, the tires will ride and flex much better.

A 460 in the power range you are thinking; which is around where mine is, isn't going to have any issues with those 38's.
 
  #18  
Old 07-16-2014, 11:50 PM
NW 150's Avatar
NW 150
NW 150 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yea I won't trailer anything or put weight in the bed, my concern for more plys was for highway driving as the truck will see around a max of 65mph. I don't know how much plys factor in to higher speeds? I know you need to watch the air pressure and I never had any problems with the bias 36" TSL's on my old F100.

So would you suggest goin with the SX in the front and Boggers in the rear then? I've got a few months to make a decision.
 
  #19  
Old 07-17-2014, 10:37 PM
82F100SWB's Avatar
82F100SWB
82F100SWB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Dryden, ON, Canada
Posts: 5,330
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
The bogger/swamper combo is a good one. Especially if you do lots of off camber stuff, boggers don't sidehill nearly as well. Nothing like having to dial in over half a turn uphill to go straight across the bottom of my field...

My 44's are 6 ply and I run 9.5 psi, no issues up to 60 mph. Haven't had it faster on these tires as it doesn't see much pavement anymore but I did have it up to 110 on the old 38.5's...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
riggz
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
37
09-13-2010 01:08 PM
Josh79
Offroad & 4x4
16
06-20-2004 03:57 AM
eddie3
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
2
05-14-2004 02:06 PM
CAT_man_963
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
26
03-04-2004 02:32 PM
gnet158
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
25
06-28-2003 12:23 AM



Quick Reply: Which tire is better for the mud?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.