6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Atlas 40 ficm mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-15-2012, 03:14 PM
05 f250 6 inch lift's Avatar
05 f250 6 inch lift
05 f250 6 inch lift is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I roll into suckville late on a Friday nite an set up my camper. Not sure how long I'm goin to be here but could be a permanent resident.

05 with stock motor an stock gears turning 37x13.5x18 AT. Have nO lie-o-meter an cant figure MPG y hand because when speedo reads 65 I'm running 72.
But I know my MPG suck.

Soon to put in 4.56 gears in her an hopes MPG goes up.
 
  #17  
Old 05-15-2012, 06:30 PM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
blain next time your in town let me know I can make things happen to keep your truck running while you wait.
so far what it seems is ford has caped the ficm programing to reduce the effects of pcm tuning. Mine runs great, as it should now. and if you would like you can drive mine before you send yours off to ed
 
  #18  
Old 05-15-2012, 07:36 PM
Piolet's Avatar
Piolet
Piolet is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Francestown, NH
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cheezit
ford has caped the ficm programing to reduce the effects of pcm tuning
They don't play fair, do they?
 
  #19  
Old 05-16-2012, 07:00 AM
amdriven2liv's Avatar
amdriven2liv
amdriven2liv is offline
I'm hitting easy street

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 6,390
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Well, just did 691.1 miles. Used 49.37 gallons 13.9983796 MPG. Not great.

I still have some hope for higher mileage. Those miles were at 70-75 MPH.(Most were at 75) 3 Major passes had to climb over Snoqualmie, Lookout and Fourth of July.

Running light. Probably truck weight of 8600 Lbs. I run 35's, level kit.

Not sure if re-learn will do anything. My truck sat for 4 days batteries unhooked. New turbo, and of course the FICM tune Atlas 40.

So far, that's my story.

Not sure which hurts more, 13.99 or paying 4.54 per gallon on 22.08 gallons.
 
  #20  
Old 05-16-2012, 01:39 PM
SixGunCaliforniaKid's Avatar
SixGunCaliforniaKid
SixGunCaliforniaKid is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: V
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I visit sucksville sometimes... but I have gotten some good MPGS ill have to take a pic of my log book I keep on the truck.
 
  #21  
Old 05-16-2012, 07:35 PM
Frankenbiker's Avatar
Frankenbiker
Frankenbiker is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by amdriven2liv
Well, just did 691.1 miles. Used 49.37 gallons 13.9983796 MPG. Not great.

I still have some hope for higher mileage. Those miles were at 70-75 MPH.(Most were at 75) 3 Major passes had to climb over Snoqualmie, Lookout and Fourth of July.
Those passes aren't minor hills. If you did them at 75, then you'll probably see better mileage once you get some time on the flats.

Running light. Probably truck weight of 8600 Lbs. I run 35's, level kit.

Not sure if re-learn will do anything. My truck sat for 4 days batteries unhooked. New turbo, and of course the FICM tune Atlas 40.
You don't mention if you have any programming in the PCM to account for the PowerMax... The rumor mill says that you have to have some programming tweaks to make it work right.

Not sure which hurts more, 13.99 or paying 4.54 per gallon on 22.08 gallons.
I'll trade you, $3.95 for 160 gallons.

-blaine
 
  #22  
Old 05-16-2012, 07:38 PM
Frankenbiker's Avatar
Frankenbiker
Frankenbiker is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Quick reminder for everyone here, about mileage.

Remember that these trucks are aerodynamic bricks.

I don't think that any one of us tips the scales at less than 8000 lbs, and I think everyone here has 4x4...

They're not going to be mileage champions without some SUBSTANTIAL mods...

-blaine
 
  #23  
Old 05-16-2012, 08:13 PM
GreenPSD's Avatar
GreenPSD
GreenPSD is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frankenbiker
Count me as a resident of Suckville, too.

I've never broken 500 miles on a tank, and am hard pressed to break 400. Stock wheels/tires. I can get 450 if I run the freeway with the cruise set at 65 and getting down to the low-fuel warning.

I know people get tired of hearing me say this, but Ford completely neutered the late-build '06's and '07's -- basically anything past about a May build date on the engines. (yes, I can hear the collective eye roll as I type this.... )

Mostly to make the bean counters and the EPA happy. It's the whole reason for the '07's hideous throttle lag and poor mileage. MOST of this (but not all) is cured by rolling back the FICM.

Now that people are beginning to report good results with the Atlas 40, now I have to figure out a way to get the FICM out of the truck and sent to Ed...

-blaine
I have an early '06 (build date of 11/05) with stock tires and no tunes and I get 17.5 - 18.0 mpg on average. I am curious if I could push the 20 mpg mark with the Atlas 40.
 
  #24  
Old 05-16-2012, 08:29 PM
Curt's05's Avatar
Curt's05
Curt's05 is offline
Wiser by FTE

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,826
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
GreenPSD, the feedback from ed@ficmrepair.com is 1-2 mpg increase
 
  #25  
Old 05-16-2012, 08:35 PM
amdriven2liv's Avatar
amdriven2liv
amdriven2liv is offline
I'm hitting easy street

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 6,390
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Of course it would help if I get the truck recalibrated for the larger tires that came with the truck.

Last leg of the trip, was watching the mile markers and found that it is nearly a tenth of a mile off.

60 miles, I lose 4.3 miles. Should be 64.3 miles drove.

So, if I figure those uncounted miles into my post, I hit 15 MPG. Doing 75 MPH.

A little better.

I haven't noticed much difference in the new turbo. But, it does have the Atlas 40 behind it.
 
  #26  
Old 05-16-2012, 09:01 PM
Curt's05's Avatar
Curt's05
Curt's05 is offline
Wiser by FTE

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,826
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
You could use your gps for accurate mpg. My truck was 1% high with stock tires, using a gps as reference.
 
  #27  
Old 05-19-2012, 09:28 AM
Fulthrotl's Avatar
Fulthrotl
Fulthrotl is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by m-chan68
That's about how I feel. I have wrenched on LOTS of these trucks and I just don't get how these owners are claiming 20 mpgs. I have to admit, I am a little bit of a lead foot, but that's only because I know that driving it like a granny driver isn't good for these trucks.
the one good thing about the banks IQ is that it has what i call the
barf-o-meter screen. you enter what you paid for gas, and it does
a running total of the money spent of fuel since you turned on the
key this morning, and it's accurate to 2%. fill the tank to one click
in the morning, drive it around and after a tank, fill it at the same
pump, and the amount you spend versus what it says you spent
is within a buck or two on $75 worth of fuel.

so, with 10k rolling weight, on level ground, no wind, going
to san diego on I-5 thru camp pendelton, going south, i got
19.6 mpg. coming north an hour later, no wind, i got 17.2 mpg.
cruise control on 65.

did a repeat two days later, playing with the power settings,
and found that economy #2 setting gets lower mpg than
#6 setting (+100hp/+150fp)

overall milage for the van since rebuild is 13.6 mpg, considering
it's almost all stop and go, and the weight, that seems like a gift.

20 mpg? no way in hell. there is no such thing as a free lunch.
 
  #28  
Old 05-26-2012, 05:37 PM
Curt's05's Avatar
Curt's05
Curt's05 is offline
Wiser by FTE

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,826
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Just went on a 130 mile excursion to a winery & 18.15 mpg hand calculated, unloaded, all freeway driving 60-70 mph. The combo tunes seem to work well with freeway driving!
 
  #29  
Old 06-23-2012, 12:47 AM
FICMrepair.com's Avatar
FICMrepair.com
FICMrepair.com is offline
Former Vendor
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
While the PHP tunes help mileage out quite a bit (0.5-3 mpg is what I've been told from various of my customers, it seems, with an average of about 2), the thing to remember in any vehicle is that speed kills fuel economy. Drop from 75mph down to 70 and you'll see a difference. Drop from 70 down to the 'are we there yet' speed of 55mph and it will be HUGE.

Quite a lot of the mileage gain variance has to do with what tune the customer had on their truck to begin with. Those with the latest tune seem to see the largest gains, those with the earliest tunes see the least, but those are the same guys that have to plug their trucks in during the winter due to zero heat induction in the flash.
 
  #30  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:17 AM
cheezit's Avatar
cheezit
cheezit is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: N. Fort Worth, tx
Posts: 12,123
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
I have seen .3-.5 gain in my truck. But I know why....
Im the guy in the fast lane running 75+ at 5am on the way to work
 


Quick Reply: Atlas 40 ficm mpg



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.