Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

1995 F150 5.0 - ZF5 Conversion - NOISE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
1995 F150 5.0 - ZF5 Conversion - NOISE

1995 F150 5.0 4x4. I am swapping out my old M5OD with a ZF5. Everything bolted together as expected. I bought a perfection clutch kit, specific to my year, make, and model. It included a new flywheel, clutch, master cylinder and slave (throw out). Clutch is 11-inches, 10 spline. Everything seemed to match the old parts. I was careful to torque everything and ensured that the clutch tool slid in and out very easily. The ZF5 went in without too much struggle - but a little as expected.

After bleeding the clutch I started the truck and got a very loud metal on metal rotating noise that was clearly coming from the bellhousing. I crawled underneath the truck, removed the rubber plug in the bellhousing looked at everything with an inspection light. Everything looked good, the throw out bearing was just touching the fingers of the diaphragm. I could see what looked like metallic dust on the boot of the throw out bearing. I wasn't sure what was going on, but it sounded serious. I decided to pull the transmission.

After pulling out the transmission I inspected the clutch and the disc was still perfectly centered. I removed the clutch and confirmed that the clutch disc was not backwards. The flywheel new pilot bearing all looked good.

What I noticed that a witness mark inside the bellhousing. It turns out that the cover of the pressure plate was hitting a wing of the casting of the bellhousing. I was able to measure the distance of the witness mark in the bellhousing and compare it to the clutch by measuring off of the dust shield / separator plate. I could see slight witness marks on the steel pressure plate. The noise would get much worse by letting the clutch out - this would cause the pressure plate to flex outward a little.

I clearenced the casting with a carbide bit, and I still need to reinstall the transmission.

BUT - HAS ANYONE EVER RUN INTO THIS? Is this common? Is this a sign of a larger problem? Should I run a 10-inch clutch?

NOTES: I also had to take a carbide bit to make more clearance for the hydraulic throw out bearing to clear the bellhousing - didn't seem like a big deal. Before I took the transmission back out, I added a shim to the starter to eliminate that as the source of noise - no signs of any conflicts with the starter. I also thoroughly bled the clutch with a mighty vac in case that was causing odd noises. The noise still persisted - it was obviously the pressure plate contacting a casting of the bellhousing that stuck out.



These two pictures show the "witness mark" in the bellhousing. I was in a hurry and took a black sharpy to mark the area I wanted to grind out to make clearence and started using the die grinder before I decided to take a pictures.







 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 03:44 PM
  #2  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
Here is a picture of the tag on the ZF5.


 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 03:53 PM
  #3  
90project5.0's Avatar
90project5.0
Fleet Mechanic
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 410
When you say you bought the clutch kit for your yr make and model, do you mean a 95 f150 or whatever the ZF came out of?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 03:59 PM
  #4  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by 90project5.0
When you say you bought the clutch kit for your yr make and model, do you mean a 95 f150 or whatever the ZF came out of?
I replaced it with stock equipment that would go with my truck: '95 F150 4x4 5.0 MDO5. I was of the impression that these parts are the same when converting MDO5 to the ZF5.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
90project5.0's Avatar
90project5.0
Fleet Mechanic
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 410
What year did the ZF come from?

Reason for asking is other threads talk about slave cylinder bore size changed around 93.
 

Last edited by 90project5.0; Feb 2, 2026 at 04:25 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by 90project5.0
What year did the ZF come from?

Reason for asking is other threads talk about slave cylinder bore size changed around 93.
Interesting… Can you expand on the change?
The build date of the ZF5 on the tag looks to read Jan 23, 1989.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 05:51 PM
  #7  
90project5.0's Avatar
90project5.0
Fleet Mechanic
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 410
I have zero first hand on this! I’ll say that up front! I came across this thread.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...-zf5-swap.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2026 | 06:00 PM
  #8  
My4Fordtrucks's Avatar
My4Fordtrucks
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 12,884
Likes: 2,448
Originally Posted by 90project5.0
What year did the ZF come from?

Reason for asking is other threads talk about slave cylinder bore size changed around 93.
I did the same swap in my ‘89 F-150. I purchased the clutch for the truck that the ZF came out of (‘90 F-250) and did not have any issues.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 10:43 AM
  #9  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
As for my ZF5, I do not know what vehicle it came out of. But I know the build date is 1989 and that it bolts to a SBF. I went to RockAuto to compare parts. I compared the clutch for a 1995 F150, 5.0, manual, to a 1989 F250, 5.0, manual. Both came back with the same part number (MU641K - Perfection clutch brand). So the clutch is the same.

The master and slave (throw out) seem to be different.

The part number for the master and slave cyl for a '95 F150 (5.0, manual) is PF9017
The part number the the master and slave cy for an '89 F250 (5.0 manual) is PF9077

Here they are side by side:

________________________________1995 F150__________________________________________________ _______1989 F250



They are obviously different. I think this is why I needed to clearance the bellhousing for the slave cylinder to fit (In order to fit the yellow/orange aluminum piece at the end where the hose connects.)

By looking at the two it would seem that the master cylinders are not compatible, the plastic hoses look to have much different bends. The '89 master has male (bolts) that stick into the firewall, while the '95 master has holes for bolts that stick out of the firewall.

When I got the ZF5 it still had the old slave cylinder installed, and I can confirm that it looked like the one above on the right for the "89 F250 which can be seen in the first picture I added to this thread; on the left side of the transmission.

These two styles do not seem to have the same connection type, so I don't think I could run a '95 F150 Master with the '89 F250 slave unless I have some kind of adapter at where the hydraulic line connects to the hydraulic connection at the slave cylinder.

Something tells me that the parts I have are good to go. BUT DOES ANYONE WITH MORE EXPERIENCE IN THIS REALM HAVE MORE CLEAR ADVICE / KNOWLEDGE?

I am trying to think why different slave cylinders would cause a clearance issue between the bellhousing and the clutch pressure plate?????

I put the transmission back in last night. Still need to put the crossmember/ transfer case / driveshafts back in.

Here is a couple pics after I grinding more room where it was hitting:



Here is a close up of the ZF5 with the slave for a '95 F150 installed. You can see where I took a die grinder to make more room for the bottom hose fitting to clear the bellhousing.
 

Last edited by Dandolf; Feb 3, 2026 at 06:23 PM. Reason: ocd
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 12:02 PM
  #10  
wwhite's Avatar
wwhite
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 855
What pressure plate did you get? Part number, complete clutch kit with pressure plate, 11"?

I just had a quick look, and the parts for a 5 speed are from 1987-1994, then 1995-1997.

I doubt the cause is the slave cylinder, you more than likely have the wrong year pressure plate/clutch kit for the year of the transmission.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 12:23 PM
  #11  
TobyB's Avatar
TobyB
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 949
Likes: 187
From: Carnation, Wah
If everything is working now,

I'd run it.

I also agree that it's probably the pressure plate/ flywheel stack- up-
but Ford made small running changes
like this, and changing the ribbing in the bell housing
to run a deeper clutch is totally believable.

A 5- liter is not stressing a ZF-5 at all, so me, I wouldn't worry.

t
not one for overthinking it too much.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
My4Fordtrucks's Avatar
My4Fordtrucks
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 12,884
Likes: 2,448
Originally Posted by Dandolf
What I noticed that a witness mark inside the bellhousing. It turns out that the cover of the pressure plate was hitting a wing of the casting of the bellhousing.
Originally Posted by wwhite
What pressure plate did you get? Part number, complete clutch kit with pressure plate, 11"?

I just had a quick look, and the parts for a 5 speed are from 1987-1994, then 1995-1997..
That’s what it sounds like. As I already said I didn’t have any interference issues with my Luk clutch.
 

Last edited by My4Fordtrucks; Feb 3, 2026 at 03:08 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 05:10 PM
  #13  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by wwhite
What pressure plate did you get? Part number, complete clutch kit with pressure plate, 11"?

I just had a quick look, and the parts for a 5 speed are from 1987-1994, then 1995-1997.

I doubt the cause is the slave cylinder, you more than likely have the wrong year pressure plate/clutch kit for the year of the transmission.
I bought a Perfection Clutch Clutch kit including the pressure plate and clutch disc. I bought this for a 1995 Ford F150. The part number is MU641K
The clutch kit for a 1989 F250 has the same part number: MU641K

Still using RockAuto, I looked up the part numbers for the LUK clutch kit (pressure plate and disc) for a 1995 F150 and 1989 F250. This shows two different part numbers:

1995 F150 LUK Clutch Kit PN: 07128
1989 F250 LUK Clutch Kit PN: 07057
Both are labeled "standard duty"

When comparing the two they seem very similar, but the clutch discs (at least) are different:
1995 F150 on the left. 1989 F250 on the right.

The only difference I can see is the clutch disc. The '95 F150 has 5 clutch disc springs, and the '89 F250 has 4 clutch disc springs. Both are 11-inch, and have the same diameters and spline count.

The Perfection Clutch thatI installed has 5 springs in the clutch disc. The spring count seems to be completely dependent on the manufacturer and not the year or type of transmission that it's going in. When comparing replacement clutch discs between a 1995 F150 and a 1989 F250, there are several options for each that have 4 and 5 springs based on the brand.

I also compared just the pressure plate part numbers. This stuff all seems to vary depending on the manufacturer. On RockAuto, when comparing just the pressure plates (À La Carte), only 1 brand pops up (M-Pact Brand) and they both have the same part number: 360064

So as far as I can tell, some manufactures differ part numbers between half-ton clutch kits (MDO5) and 3/4+-ton (ZF5) clutch kits, but many of the manufactures consider these parts interchangeable. I still don't know why I have/had an interference issue. I didn't come across anything like this when going through the forums. BUT I think it will work.

Maybe TobyB is right and I'm just overthinking it. I'll send it and cross my fingers


 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 05:21 PM
  #14  
Dandolf's Avatar
Dandolf
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 70
Likes: 36
Thanks for the replies everyone! I would still like to get to the bottom of this.
I love this truck, and it's been out of commission for about 5-weeks now. Here are some "teaser" pics of other work I've been doing to keep people interested hahahaha













 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2026 | 05:49 PM
  #15  
90project5.0's Avatar
90project5.0
Fleet Mechanic
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Oct 2025
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 410
You had factory 24lb injectors or you added that? I don’t have anything to add about the trans except that’s odd. I haven’t seen anything anywhere while searching. All the differences are internal, not external which doesn’t change circumference. Yours does have the really deep granny gear, so maybe that changed what it came out of?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE