Allison Swap Using T444E Parts - Done Before?
#1
Allison Swap Using T444E Parts - Done Before?
This thread ain't created to discuss merits ("just get a BTS"). Been working up a list of parts required to fit an Allison 1000/2000/2400 behind the 7.3 using International parts, and wanted to see if anyone had done it before in the Superduty trucks. Big question is will the SAE flywheel housing that attaches to the back of the engine fit without major clearance issues?
Another big question is flywheel balance. My engine is getting balanced with a Summit flexplate... I'm assuming that all the flywheels and flex plates for the T444E engine, be it in Ford or International application, use the same counter weighting? Given that there isn't different crank shaft or balancer part numbers for each application I'm assuming that flex plates/flywheels/spacers are all interchangeable and if I use the International parts to bolt up an Allison it shouldn't mess with the engine balance.
Another big question is flywheel balance. My engine is getting balanced with a Summit flexplate... I'm assuming that all the flywheels and flex plates for the T444E engine, be it in Ford or International application, use the same counter weighting? Given that there isn't different crank shaft or balancer part numbers for each application I'm assuming that flex plates/flywheels/spacers are all interchangeable and if I use the International parts to bolt up an Allison it shouldn't mess with the engine balance.
The following users liked this post:
#2
What does your machinist think about the balancing differences between the flex-plates? My assumption is that if the engine is balanced with a balanced flex plate, switching to another balanced flex plate should not matter. I mean, we do similar in zf6 swaps and all, light flex plate switched to heavy flywheel and a clutch, both of which are component balanced.
Interestingly enough, I had a customer call the other day with this exact same question, fresh engine and oem flex plate about to be balanced at machine shop. His machinist seemed to want the actual flex plate that would be used.
I guess I need to ask the engine/machinist guys at the other side of the shop to see what they think lol
I know one guy who has done the conversion with the sae2 bellhousing, he is a moderator on the 7.3 technical page facebook club, though I think his electronics and all are still from CA Conversions
Interestingly enough, I had a customer call the other day with this exact same question, fresh engine and oem flex plate about to be balanced at machine shop. His machinist seemed to want the actual flex plate that would be used.
I guess I need to ask the engine/machinist guys at the other side of the shop to see what they think lol
I know one guy who has done the conversion with the sae2 bellhousing, he is a moderator on the 7.3 technical page facebook club, though I think his electronics and all are still from CA Conversions
The following users liked this post:
#3
What does your machinist think about the balancing differences between the flex-plates? My assumption is that if the engine is balanced with a balanced flex plate, switching to another balanced flex plate should not matter. I mean, we do similar in zf6 swaps and all, light flex plate switched to heavy flywheel and a clutch, both of which are component balanced.
IIRC international only used a SAE 2 flywheel housing. SAE 2 transmissions hooked up directly, SAE 3 used a reducer ring. Same on the DT466. I'd definitely be interested in picking his brain if he's willing.
#4
If your on Facebook get on this group and search his name and you can see all his posts about it.
#6
I think the “proper” way to balance an externally balanced engine is with the parts you’re actually going to use. Yes each flexplate should all have the “same” counterweight but you know how production tolerances can be or how they can stack up. The engine builder is probably planning on getting it way closer to true balance compared to factory standards.
Not sure the slight variations in parts would be a big deal though on an engine that only turns 3400rpm.
Not sure the slight variations in parts would be a big deal though on an engine that only turns 3400rpm.
The following 3 users liked this post by RacinJasonWV:
#7
My line of thought is, If I order a conplete kit from CA Conversions, there is nobody saying I have to pull my engine and balance it with the flexplate first, and they obviously wouldnt be selling them if they were going to damage engines.
I agree with JasonWV that the fresh engine at the builder may be to tighter tolerances, and can understand them wanting the actual flexplate to balance with it, so as to the the most perfected product balance
I agree with JasonWV that the fresh engine at the builder may be to tighter tolerances, and can understand them wanting the actual flexplate to balance with it, so as to the the most perfected product balance
Trending Topics
#8
I wouldn’t give the balance any thought if buying a decent quality flexplate to replace one that’s already on there. In PriusLover’s case I would provide the flexplate to the machinist as he requested. If it gets changed later then no biggie in my opinion. These things live a million miles with just component balancing on factory tolerances.
#9
This machinist is mostly in the high performance gas engine world where this would probably be a more pressing concern. Worst case scenario, if I do the conversion and notice a horrible vibration, I could potentially get the crank spacer counterweight modified to present a counterweight more similar to the 4R100 flexplate the engine was balanced with.
(No counterweight on the flex plate in the T444E application)
(No counterweight on the flex plate in the T444E application)
#10
@PriusLover
Make sure you have good running condition engine first..
Then add all this cool stuff..
Balancing talk similar to turbo balancing(of course turbo shaft speeds in 100 000rpm+)but chasing for perfection calls a balanced assembly regardless the usage.
Make sure you have good running condition engine first..
Then add all this cool stuff..
Balancing talk similar to turbo balancing(of course turbo shaft speeds in 100 000rpm+)but chasing for perfection calls a balanced assembly regardless the usage.
#11
The following users liked this post:
#12
Originally Posted by PriusLover
This machinist is mostly in the high performance gas engine world where this would probably be a more pressing concern. Worst case scenario, if I do the conversion and notice a horrible vibration, I could potentially get the crank spacer counterweight modified to present a counterweight more similar to the 4R100 flexplate the engine was balanced with.
(No counterweight on the flex plate in the T444E application)
(No counterweight on the flex plate in the T444E application)
The machinist could possibly internally balance your engine which wouldn’t require counterweight on the flexplate or harmonic balancer. But that’s opening a whole other can of worms.
Point of my reply is, you cannot use the T444E flexplate as a direct bolt on option if it doesn’t have the counterweight balancing and the 7.3 flexplate does.
The following users liked this post:
#13
#14
The following users liked this post:
#15