2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

6.2 or 7.3 for slide-in camper?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-02-2020, 01:03 PM
heinphoto's Avatar
heinphoto
heinphoto is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Northern California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
6.2 or 7.3 for slide-in camper?

We just placed an order for a slide-in camper and need to buy a truck. My best guess is that the camper will weigh ~2500-3000 lbs "wet" with two passegers and our gear factored in. We will primarily be using it to access remote, offroad campsites in the mountains (Sierra) and deserts, but will have long drives on pavement to get there. The camper is designed for an 8-foot bed, so we are looking at a F350 SCLB. The truck will be pretty much dedicated for this use - we plan to keep the camper loaded on the truck for a quick escape, and the rear seat area will be used for gear, not passengers. The place I'm stuck at the moment is choosing the 6.2L vs 7.3L gas engine (we have ruled out diesel for a variety of reasons). We rented a similar camper on a 2015 F350 with the 6.2, and not surprisingly it handled the load just fine (although we didn't do any mountain driving on that trip). So, we would probably be just fine with the 6.2. However, before we commit, I would be interested in thoughts folks might have about this. I am a little hesitant to buy a first year engine, but early returns on the 7.3 seem to be positive. If the 7.3 would perform significantly better under this kind of load in the mountains or offroad, or get better mileage (which translates to range), then I would certainly consider going this route.
 
  #2  
Old 02-02-2020, 02:48 PM
Wildweasle86's Avatar
Wildweasle86
Wildweasle86 is offline
Cross-Country
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 98
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vote for 7.3.
 
  #3  
Old 02-02-2020, 02:58 PM
PentaPop's Avatar
PentaPop
PentaPop is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
For that load I think either engine will do just fine. My 6.2 handles our 5000lb trailer with ease. If you’re going to use the truck almost exclusively for hauling the TC I think it’s worth your time to consider a dually. Our trailer is a Lance so I hang out on the Lance forum quite a bit. That forum is a good mix of Lance TC and TT owners and one thing I see a lot is TC owners wishing they’d bought a DRW instead of a SRW. Just something to think about.....
 
The following users liked this post:
  #4  
Old 02-02-2020, 03:02 PM
crewzer's Avatar
crewzer
crewzer is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mills River
Posts: 4,334
Received 271 Likes on 211 Posts
Lightbulb

I assume you’re also looking at a 4x4.

The 6.2 would probably do fine, especially with a 4.30 axle ratio. However, the 7.3 & 4.30 & LT275/70R18E A/T tire options allows you to increase the SCLB’s GVWR from 11,500 lbs to 11,800, and, everything else being equal, official payload is increased by 200 lbs.

Doing the same thing with the CCLB increases the GVWR from 11,500 lbs. to 11,900, and increases payload by 310 lbs.

The SCLB comes with a 34 gallon fuel tank, and the highest available trim level is Lariat + the optional Value Package. The CCLB come with a 48 gallon fuel tank.

Either way, you’ll probably want to order the optional camper package.

The big 240 A alternator is (usually?) optional with the 6.2. It’s standard with the 7.3, with dual alternators optional.

Tell us more about your proposed TC!

HTH,
Jim / crewzer
 
  #5  
Old 02-02-2020, 03:07 PM
heinphoto's Avatar
heinphoto
heinphoto is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Northern California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by PentaPop
For that load I think either engine will do just fine. My 6.2 handles our 5000lb trailer with ease. If you’re going to use the truck almost exclusively for hauling the TC I think it’s worth your time to consider a dually. Our trailer is a Lance so I hang out on the Lance forum quite a bit. That forum is a good mix of Lance TC and TT owners and one thing I see a lot is TC owners wishing they’d bought a DRW instead of a SRW. Just something to think about.....
Thanks - the truck camper we ordered is a fairly lightweight pop-up camper (a Four Wheel Camper). So, I think the 1-ton SRW will be fine (plus I wouldn't be wild about the dually on some of the offroad trails). However, if we ever upgraded to a hard side like the Lance, I would definitely consider also upgrading to a dually.
 
  #6  
Old 02-02-2020, 03:22 PM
heinphoto's Avatar
heinphoto
heinphoto is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Northern California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by SDcrewzer
I assume you’re also looking at a 4x4.
The 6.2 would probably do fine, especially with a 4.30 axle ratio. However, the 7.3 & 4.30 & LT275/70R18E A/T tire options allows you to increase the SCLB’s GVWR from 11,500 lbs to 11,800, and, everything else being equal, official payload is increased by 200 lbs.
Doing the same thing with the CCLB increases the GVWR from 11,500 lbs. to 11,900, and increases payload by 310 lbs.
The SCLB comes with a 34 gallon fuel tank, and the highest available trim level is Lariat + the optional Value Package. The CCLB come with a 48 gallon fuel tank.
Either way, you’ll probably want to order the optional camper package.
The big 240 A alternator is (usually?) optional with the 6.2. It’s standard with the 7.3, with dual alternators optional.
Tell us more about your proposed TC!
HTH,
Jim / crewzer
Definitely 4x4 with 4.3 axle ratio. If i didn't need a long bed, I would probably also be considering the Tremor package. The camper is a Four Wheel Camper Grandby pop-up. Dry weight is ~1800 pounds, but I tend to travel heavy with photo equipment, etc, so looking at F350 for a safe payload margin. Supercrew over crew cab for a little shorter wheelbase offroad.
Thanks,
-Scott
 
  #7  
Old 02-02-2020, 03:34 PM
acadianbob's Avatar
acadianbob
acadianbob is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,228
Received 542 Likes on 305 Posts
6.2 with 10 speed will easily handle that load . . . if you order a truck . . . . get 4.30's . . . . .
 
  #8  
Old 02-02-2020, 05:14 PM
SuperDuty Wannabe's Avatar
SuperDuty Wannabe
SuperDuty Wannabe is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 375
Received 67 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by acadianbob
6.2 with 10 speed will easily handle that load . . . if you order a truck . . . . get 4.30's . . . . .
I don't believe there is a 6.2 & 10 speed combo available ..
 
  #9  
Old 02-02-2020, 05:33 PM
wb6anp's Avatar
wb6anp
wb6anp is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Weatherford Texas.
Posts: 3,541
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by PentaPop
For that load I think either engine will do just fine. My 6.2 handles our 5000lb trailer with ease. If you’re going to use the truck almost exclusively for hauling the TC I think it’s worth your time to consider a dually. Our trailer is a Lance so I hang out on the Lance forum quite a bit. That forum is a good mix of Lance TC and TT owners and one thing I see a lot is TC owners wishing they’d bought a DRW instead of a SRW. Just something to think about.....
Quick question, what is your handle over on LOA.
 
  #10  
Old 02-02-2020, 05:38 PM
Mkos1980's Avatar
Mkos1980
Mkos1980 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperDuty Wannabe
I don't believe there is a 6.2 & 10 speed combo available ..
Its the stock motor trans combo in the F350.
 
  #11  
Old 02-02-2020, 06:25 PM
Joe T's Avatar
Joe T
Joe T is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Chaz
Posts: 9,039
Received 938 Likes on 739 Posts
6.2 with 10 speed will work just fine.


If you have plans to install larger tires at any time get the 4.30. Not needed necessarily but with 10 speeds a headwind or hill the opportunity to be going 9th to 10th a lot will add wear and possible annoyance.

If this is a new thing and you plan to upgrade later a F250 without a lot of options would haul that. Shouldnt have an issue with 3.73s unless you put larger tires on it.
 
  #12  
Old 02-02-2020, 06:30 PM
heinphoto's Avatar
heinphoto
heinphoto is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Northern California
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe T
If you have plans to install larger tires at any time get the 4.30. Not needed necessarily but with 10 speeds a headwind or hill the opportunity to be going 9th to 10th a lot will add wear and possible annoyance.
If this is a new thing and you plan to upgrade later a F250 without a lot of options would haul that. Shouldnt have an issue with 3.73s unless you put larger tires on it.
I will start with stock tires and see how that goes. However, I would like to have the option to upgrade to larger tires down the road. So I will probably go with the 4.30 to have the flexibility in the future.
 
  #13  
Old 02-02-2020, 06:31 PM
jimd1050's Avatar
jimd1050
jimd1050 is offline
Worry later? IT IS LATER!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plainville, MA
Posts: 1,276
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
I ran this 2015 F-350 SCSB with our 3080 lb 2013 Eagle Cap EC850 from Nov of 2014 until I just sold it and bought a 2019 F-450. The 6.2 treated me well, except for long hill climbs and mountainous terrain. When we got up into northern NH and ME, the Adirondacks of upstate NY... ugh! The F-450, with our 2019 Arctic Fox AF1140 onboard is 1000 lbs over GVWR and the truck pulls it and handles like it like the camper isn't even there! Of course, it's a 6.7l diesel and the 14,000lb GVWR is way underrated by Ford! Should be more like 16,5000 - they try to make it easier for folks to register them non-commercial. I'm off track... go with the 7.3!!!

 
  #14  
Old 02-02-2020, 06:35 PM
Joe T's Avatar
Joe T
Joe T is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Chaz
Posts: 9,039
Received 938 Likes on 739 Posts
Were those larger tires with 3.73 gears or 4.30?

Originally Posted by heinphoto
I will start with stock tires and see how that goes. However, I would like to have the option to upgrade to larger tires down the road. So I will probably go with the 4.30 to have the flexibility in the future.
I would do the 350 so you can keep the RPM down with the 4.30. Save some fuel plus you’ll get the 350 money back at sell, at least most of it. Plus the higher load rating.

I highly doubt you need the 7.3.
 
  #15  
Old 02-02-2020, 07:17 PM
SuperDuty Wannabe's Avatar
SuperDuty Wannabe
SuperDuty Wannabe is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 375
Received 67 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperDuty Wannabe
I don't believe there is a 6.2 & 10 speed combo available ..
totally my bad .. when I see 350, I naturally assume 6.7.
 


Quick Reply: 6.2 or 7.3 for slide-in camper?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.