X act contour floor liners BUT only for the years 2017-18 Super Duty.

 

I had Husky liners for my 2016 WRX and they fit like they were sprayed in. So I ordered them for my 2017 F2500 CC (front and rear) and found them to be a bit sloppy. They were not as nicely done as the ones for the WRX, but still very nice. I would do it again, just a bit disappointed that they are not as nicely fit as the WRX.

 

Since there was the change in the 2017+ SD’s, I’m trying to determine if WT and Husky’s kept up with the changes.

 

I did husky for them2017king ranch and they are great.

 

I've never had a set of weather tech or husky mats, but the Ford ones fit nicely in my truck. I would like to note that there are at least two different Ford all weather mats available. One type is tight fitting and the other is not. I was able order them at cost($116 out the door) when buying my truck.

 

I have the weather techs front and rear and they are complete ‘over the hump’ versions.

They fit perfectly and do a great job collecting and protecting slush and dirt.

They also clean up quickly with water bad to a like new condition when it’s time to clean them up. They are not slippery either.

I’m not anti Husky either. I love they wheel liners and have them installed in my rear wheel wells.

 

I’ve had weathertech’s in all of my work trucks and never had a complaint. I’ve worn through some of the cheaper brands where my heel sits. Never had Husky’s so I can’t say anything about them.

 

I like the Huskys, great coverage and fit but mainly because they are soft and easy to manipulate. I despise my wife's weather techs for that reason, they are a pia to take in and out because they are so inflexible and hard. Just my opinion.

 

I hate my weather techs. Hate them. The rear wants to slide back over the tray that sits under the rear seats. That leaves about a 2” gap in the front between the mat and the console/jump seat. The front drivers side is ok, except there’s a gap of about 1/2” all the way around. The anchors for the drivers mat are helpful. The passenger doesn’t anchor as well and slides around over time. There’s more of a gap on that side. I’ve heard of the over the hump weather techs but never seen them in a truck or for sale anywhere.

 

I've had WT front and rear in my '15 250 and currently in my '17 350. All have fit perfectly. I also had had the bed mat in the 250 and it fit perfectly. I'd have one in the 350 too, but they don't make it for the '17+ SD yet.

 

I know this is about Husky vs. WeatherTechs, but my Ford OEM rubber mats fit great. ~$120.

 

And both Weathertechs and Husky X-Acts in my last two trucks. Both fit good. If I needed to buy again today, I'd go with the X-Acts due to their slightly softer material. The Weathertech's were hard and slippery.

 

Well I really want to know if the fit is best on the 17+SD’s. But with your reply, is there any chance that the Husky’s because they are softer wear out faster?

 

I had the Weathertech's in my F150 but decided to do the Husky X-Acts in my F250. Price was one of the reasons since AutoAnything would give me a discount on them and they were already on sale.

 

Does the weathertech front passenger mat move around in the F-250 like it does in the F-150? that was my only (small) issue with them.