'92 - '97 F-350: What GVWR(s) did they have?
#16
Maybe a review of weight ratings is in order here. My F-250HD has a Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR) for the front axle of 4100 lbs, a GAWR for the rear axle of 6084 lbs and a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of 8800 lbs. That means that the truck is rated to carry at most 4100 lbs on the front axle and at most 6084 lbs on the rear axle. But that does NOT mean that it's rated to carry 10,184 lbs total. It's only rated to carry 8,800 lbs total (and lest someone accuse me of mixing up GVWR and payload, I'm including the truck's weight in the totals I'm saying it's rated to carry).
So why does the GVWR not equal the sum of the GAWRs? I can't say for sure, but what it means is that I don't have to be incredibly careful about weight distribution when I'm loading the truck to the max. I can have up to 4100 lbs on the front axle, but if I do I can only have up to 4700 lbs on the rear. Or I can have up to 6084 lbs on the rear, as long as I have only 2716 lbs on the front.
So I'm not worried about GAWRs, not because they aren't important, but because I'm going to be over the GVWR before I get close to either GAWR.
So why does the GVWR not equal the sum of the GAWRs? I can't say for sure, but what it means is that I don't have to be incredibly careful about weight distribution when I'm loading the truck to the max. I can have up to 4100 lbs on the front axle, but if I do I can only have up to 4700 lbs on the rear. Or I can have up to 6084 lbs on the rear, as long as I have only 2716 lbs on the front.
So I'm not worried about GAWRs, not because they aren't important, but because I'm going to be over the GVWR before I get close to either GAWR.
The axle rating doesnt really mean much, I dont even know why they bother to put it on there.
I TRIED to register my CCSB my axle weights(10,184lbs) the state said NO. That the GVWR is 8,800 and that was All I could register it for
#17
The GVWR is 8800lbs. that means you are allowed to have 8800b on all 4 tires
The axle rating doesnt really mean much, I dont even know why they bother to put it on there.
I TRIED to register my CCSB my axle weights(10,184lbs) the state said NO. That the GVWR is 8,800 and that was All I could register it for
The axle rating doesnt really mean much, I dont even know why they bother to put it on there.
I TRIED to register my CCSB my axle weights(10,184lbs) the state said NO. That the GVWR is 8,800 and that was All I could register it for
#19
Maybe a review of weight ratings is in order here. My F-250HD has a Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR) for the front axle of 4100 lbs, a GAWR for the rear axle of 6084 lbs and a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) of 8800 lbs. That means that the truck is rated to carry at most 4100 lbs on the front axle and at most 6084 lbs on the rear axle. But that does NOT mean that it's rated to carry 10,184 lbs total. It's only rated to carry 8,800 lbs total (and lest someone accuse me of mixing up GVWR and payload, I'm including the truck's weight in the totals I'm saying it's rated to carry).
So why does the GVWR not equal the sum of the GAWRs? I can't say for sure, but what it means is that I don't have to be incredibly careful about weight distribution when I'm loading the truck to the max. I can have up to 4100 lbs on the front axle, but if I do I can only have up to 4700 lbs on the rear. Or I can have up to 6084 lbs on the rear, as long as I have only 2716 lbs on the front.
So I'm not worried about GAWRs, not because they aren't important, but because I'm going to be over the GVWR before I get close to either GAWR.
So why does the GVWR not equal the sum of the GAWRs? I can't say for sure, but what it means is that I don't have to be incredibly careful about weight distribution when I'm loading the truck to the max. I can have up to 4100 lbs on the front axle, but if I do I can only have up to 4700 lbs on the rear. Or I can have up to 6084 lbs on the rear, as long as I have only 2716 lbs on the front.
So I'm not worried about GAWRs, not because they aren't important, but because I'm going to be over the GVWR before I get close to either GAWR.
#20
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
31 Posts
you can just run your f250 with a camper without much concern.
you can't take a f350 dually,convert it to srw and think you'd be any more legal than just running your f250.
anyone who would ever bother weighing a pickup truck,would know it used to be a dually anyway lol.so that wont work.
the answer to your question as to why the axle ratings don't add up to meet the grvw is likely two fold.
because then they couldn't sell f350's over f250's.
and there is more than just axle ratings that make it safe to carry weight.tires are only rated to carry so much and the vacuum brake systems on these era pickups are very poor and incapable of stopping over their weight ratings in any sort of safe margin (i know for a fact,i don't care who disagrees lol.)
your best bet might be considering a small bumper pull or 5th wheel.your f250 is more than capable to tow a good trailer.id recommend this route.............or the F450 if you insist on carrying a camper.but as you say,the ride is harsh,you don't want a dually,the rear gears kill fuel economy too.kinda overkill for a slide in of course lol.then you really could be targeted for weigh stations.....but no concerns or worries about stopping either.
that's not going to fool anyone.besides he'd fall in love with the way the dually held his slide in,that he'd never wanna ditch the duals anyway.
...............
i go traveling & camping on the cheap.i take my little 4 cyl car,a sleeping bag and a tent is all i need.
you can't take a f350 dually,convert it to srw and think you'd be any more legal than just running your f250.
anyone who would ever bother weighing a pickup truck,would know it used to be a dually anyway lol.so that wont work.
the answer to your question as to why the axle ratings don't add up to meet the grvw is likely two fold.
because then they couldn't sell f350's over f250's.
and there is more than just axle ratings that make it safe to carry weight.tires are only rated to carry so much and the vacuum brake systems on these era pickups are very poor and incapable of stopping over their weight ratings in any sort of safe margin (i know for a fact,i don't care who disagrees lol.)
your best bet might be considering a small bumper pull or 5th wheel.your f250 is more than capable to tow a good trailer.id recommend this route.............or the F450 if you insist on carrying a camper.but as you say,the ride is harsh,you don't want a dually,the rear gears kill fuel economy too.kinda overkill for a slide in of course lol.then you really could be targeted for weigh stations.....but no concerns or worries about stopping either.
...............
i go traveling & camping on the cheap.i take my little 4 cyl car,a sleeping bag and a tent is all i need.
#21
#22
One possibility is that they're just worried about trucks damaging their roads, and they just need to make sure that my axle weight isn't above a limit set by their state that has nothing to do with my truck (other than number of axles and number of tires). Any camper I'm considering on any truck I'm considering will be fine by that.
Another possibility is that they'll go with the registration weight of the truck. A dually converted to SRW would still be registered at the dually weight and would be fine. My F-250HD becomes a wild card there though, because anything under a 1 ton truck in Minnesota is registered as a car. SmartCar or F-250HD, the registration fee is the same $35 and I don't think there's any weight rating on the registration. That's why I'm not concerned in Minnesota with my F-250HD. It's not a truck in Minnesota and cars don't need to stop at weigh stations.
A third possibility is that they'd look at the sticker in the driver's door. If they did that a dually converted to SRW would have the higher number and it might sail through just fine. Or it might specify that the vehicle is a dually and a lot of questions would get asked and my vacation would be ruined. So that is the concern with this approach.
I've looked at "toy box" campers, but even some REALLY big ones still aren't big enough inside to carry my Bronco. So I'm stuck with a camper that can tow the Bronco. A pickup with a slide-in camper or a motorhome are my only options.
And before someone suggests towing the Bronco behind a fifth wheel, that's not legal in Minnesota.
#23
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wabanaki Indian Territory
Posts: 18,724
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes
on
31 Posts
ah a tow toy.well it might be time for the motorhome Bob.i know you want it all lol but.......somethings gotta give lol.i mean like you say,you don't want to be concerned.when on vacation,you just want it stress free.i think it's your only option unless you wanna fab up a custom f450 of the era.re-gar to 4.30ish range (though some '97's come with them) from the 4.63/5.13 option,de-sping it a tad out back for a bit easier ride,fab up a bed/frame work to hold a slide in.then tow the bronc.
srw converting a drw is just gunna be the same stress and worry level as just running the 250.you don't want a dually yet ya need one.hey join the club.iv got 2 of 'em lol.sucks to buy tires.harder ride,and poorer traction,but oh can they haul.
srw converting a drw is just gunna be the same stress and worry level as just running the 250.you don't want a dually yet ya need one.hey join the club.iv got 2 of 'em lol.sucks to buy tires.harder ride,and poorer traction,but oh can they haul.
#24
ah a tow toy.well it might be time for the motorhome Bob.i know you want it all lol but.......somethings gotta give lol.i mean like you say,you don't want to be concerned.when on vacation,you just want it stress free.i think it's your only option unless you wanna fab up a custom f450 of the era.re-gar to 4.30ish range (though some '97's come with them) from the 4.63/5.13 option,de-sping it a tad out back for a bit easier ride,fab up a bed/frame work to hold a slide in.then tow the bronc.
srw converting a drw is just gunna be the same stress and worry level as just running the 250.you don't want a dually yet ya need one.hey join the club.iv got 2 of 'em lol.sucks to buy tires.harder ride,and poorer traction,but oh can they haul.
srw converting a drw is just gunna be the same stress and worry level as just running the 250.you don't want a dually yet ya need one.hey join the club.iv got 2 of 'em lol.sucks to buy tires.harder ride,and poorer traction,but oh can they haul.
This is all still in the investigative phase. If we can find a slide-in we like, and that will work with a truck I like, it's pretty attractive to not have to buy, park and maintain a motorhome. But we might find out that the 1800 lb slide-in isn't what we want anyway, or that we won't be able to find a truck I want that will carry the slide-in. And of course if I was to get an F-Superduty and try to set it up to carry a slide-in camper, I'd probably end up with a truck that's so dedicated to carrying the camper that I might as well just buy the motorhome. So if the slide-in plans don't pan out for any of these reasons we'll probably be back to plan A, the motorhome.
#25
Closing out an old thread.
We ended up deciding against a slide-in camper. Partly for the weight issues, but also because the lighter ones just weren't big enough for us inside (killing point was that there wasn't enough headroom for me to sit upright on the bed).
So we went back to looking at class C motorhomes and ended up buying one. We hadn't really wanted to buy one in the fall, but the dealer offered to store it over the winter for free. So even though we've paid for it, we won't take delivery until probably May. Which feels weird, but it is nice to not have to worry about where we're going to store it until next fall.
It's a 2015 E-450 with the 6.8L V10 and an 8,000 lb towing capacity. So I should be fine at any weigh station!
We ended up deciding against a slide-in camper. Partly for the weight issues, but also because the lighter ones just weren't big enough for us inside (killing point was that there wasn't enough headroom for me to sit upright on the bed).
So we went back to looking at class C motorhomes and ended up buying one. We hadn't really wanted to buy one in the fall, but the dealer offered to store it over the winter for free. So even though we've paid for it, we won't take delivery until probably May. Which feels weird, but it is nice to not have to worry about where we're going to store it until next fall.
It's a 2015 E-450 with the 6.8L V10 and an 8,000 lb towing capacity. So I should be fine at any weigh station!
#27
Thanks! I've done the "less-is-more" route. I like that too. But I definitely like being comfortable, fourwheeling the Bronco is a blast, and my wife likes going too if we don't need to sleep in a tent!
Actually the lightweight slide-in camper we've used was a good compromise for a long time. It was really just a glorified tent with comfortable beds for three people and quite a bit of storage. No stove, fridge, sink, furnace. We cooked and ate outside. But we're getting older (not old yet, just older )and moving to something nicer seemed like the right thing to do now.
Actually the lightweight slide-in camper we've used was a good compromise for a long time. It was really just a glorified tent with comfortable beds for three people and quite a bit of storage. No stove, fridge, sink, furnace. We cooked and ate outside. But we're getting older (not old yet, just older )and moving to something nicer seemed like the right thing to do now.
#28
I'm young (not young-young, but nowhere near older), and can appreciate a camper. Some trips I'd love a slide in camper, especially for ski/snowboard/snowmobiling trips or trips with family. Other times I want a dual sport bike and my backpacking gear. 50mpg to a trailhead, hike a bunch for as many days as I can get away for, ride home.. Both have their place, as long as you're not wasting vacation on the couch at home!
#29
#30
It depends on the state. I think Nebraska and Colorado are the ones that scared me the most when I was driving an overloaded half-ton. Signs saying things like "pickups with trailers must weigh" are hard to rationalize away. But now I don't need to!