Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

1986 F250 brake questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
Buckeye Rich's Avatar
Buckeye Rich
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
1986 F250 brake questions

I have recently picked up a 1986 F250 2wd. It has the 7700 GVW rating. The truck needed many things and brakes are one of them. I have already put new rotors, calipers, pads, etc on the front and shoes and wheel cylinders on the back. The brake pedal is very inconsistent. Sometimes the brakes feel great, other times the feel a little spongy. I have bleed the lines numerous times and I'm confident I got all the air out.

I'm going to replace the master cylinder. I notice that there are two available, over/under 8500 GVW. The only difference I can find is the under 8500 has 2.5" wide shoes and the over has 3" wide shoes.

I plan on upgrading the booster also, which is also different between the two.

Anyways, my questions...

1. Are the drum and shoe size the only difference, besides the MC and booster?

2. Is the proportioning valve different?

3. Has anyone done this swap?

4. Do all F250/350 have that rear brake line valve that regulates brake pressure based on the load?

Sorry for all the questions...just researching my options.


Thanks
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
bashby's Avatar
bashby
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,437
Likes: 4
From: Charles Town, W bygod Va
not all have the height sensing valve, my 86 had one but my buddies 83 f350 2wd dually does not. I'm not sure about your other questions
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #3  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Do some more research, and see if the over 8500 GVW are f450's. If they are, they may have had a hydroboost system, which I believe takes a different master cylinder. I know all this happened in the late 80's and 90's, but don't know if the hydroboost was available in 86.

For your inconsistent pedal, make sure you have the rear shoes adjusted all the way out. The way I do it is jack the wheel up and manually adjust the brakes till I can't turn the tire. Then I manually back it off till I can turn the tire, but there is still a little bit of rubbing going on. This will bring the shoes out to the drums, keeping the springs from pulling them back too far and giving you a low pedal sometimes.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #4  
Buckeye Rich's Avatar
Buckeye Rich
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Thanks for the replies. The LMC catalogue shows different part numbers for the over/under 8500 gvw proportioning valve.

I'll recheck the rear brake shoe adjustments, if that doesn't work, I'll try a new MC.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #5  
brinker88's Avatar
brinker88
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Williamsport, Pa
Also check the adjusting screw in the booster...sometimes they need adjusting
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #6  
Danilo's Avatar
Danilo
goat hugger
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Fontana
Club FTE Silver Member

i have an 86 f250 4x4 with a c6 and a 460 which is rated for 8500gvw. it has no hydroboost or height sensing valve. never had your situation though. good luck with that.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #7  
Buckeye Rich's Avatar
Buckeye Rich
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Danilo
i have an 86 f250 4x4 with a c6 and a 460 which is rated for 8500gvw. it has no hydroboost or height sensing valve. never had your situation though. good luck with that.
Thanks for the info. I wonder what determines what truck got the rear brake load sensing brake valve?
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2010 | 10:12 PM
  #8  
ctubutis's Avatar
ctubutis
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22,415
Likes: 92
From: Denver Metro Area, CO
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Buckeye Rich
Thanks for the info. I wonder what determines what truck got the rear brake load sensing brake valve?
Year of assembly?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #9  
Bern_F150_4x4's Avatar
Bern_F150_4x4
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Buckeye Rich
Thanks for the info. I wonder what determines what truck got the rear brake load sensing brake valve?
Good question, my '86 (8,800lb) F250 4x4 supercab has one.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #10  
cadunkle's Avatar
cadunkle
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 26
From: NJ
My '86 F-250 Supercab 8800 lbs rating had a load valve in the back. My previous truck, an '86 F-250 standard cab 8800 lbs rating had one as well. I remove them when running new brake lines as they get rusty and don't work properly. Never had a problem locking the rear wheels.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #11  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by cadunkle
My '86 F-250 Supercab 8800 lbs rating had a load valve in the back. My previous truck, an '86 F-250 standard cab 8800 lbs rating had one as well. I remove them when running new brake lines as they get rusty and don't work properly. Never had a problem locking the rear wheels.
The purpose of the load sensing valve is so the rear wheels won't lock up and slide
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
cadunkle's Avatar
cadunkle
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 26
From: NJ
Yeah, but I've never had the rear lock even with no load in the bed, no trailer and stopping emergency style. I also run lifted with larger tires on the two trucks I've removed the valve though.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #13  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,984
Likes: 2,738
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
That's the whole idea. Trucks have been a problem in the braking and handling department ever since they were invented.

The rear of the truck is either extremely light, or extremely heavy, or anything inbetween. You need heavy duty large brakes when the truck is loaded, but when it's unloaded, these lock the rear tires up too easily. This has the same affect as someone playing around pulling the e-brake doing 180's. When the rear tires lock up the rearend tends to change positions with the frontend of the truck.

The factory has always been looking for a solution to this, some of their solutions had their good points and bad ones. The load sensing valve was one, and then they went to the RABS system. I am sure they have some sort of fancy computerized system on the new trucks.

All that being said, it's no secret that the brakes on Ford pickups are one of their weak points, especially the heavier f250-up trucks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 03:50 PM
  #14  
Buckeye Rich's Avatar
Buckeye Rich
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ctubutis
Year of assembly?
1986

Just wondering why some trucks had them and other didn't?
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 08:05 PM
  #15  
ctubutis's Avatar
ctubutis
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22,415
Likes: 92
From: Denver Metro Area, CO
Club FTE Gold Member
That was my guess at an answer - year of assembly. My 1981 doesn't have one, I don't
think I've EVER seen a 1981 with one in the junk yards nor have I run across it in the factory
shop manual (but maybe I just haven't seen it there yet). I've seen 'em in the yards but never
looked closely at the years or models or anything, about all I know is I've seen 'em on
*some* trucks of this vintage.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE