Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

289 to 302 questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #1  
Michigan Rick's Avatar
Michigan Rick
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Owosso Michigan
289 to 302 questions

I know this isn't the engine forum but maybe some smart folks here?

I'm changing my dead 289 to a 1980 302 in my truck.

So...............
1. does the 302 have same firing order?

2. does the distributor go the same direction ?

3. do they make a right side exiting water pump?

4. can I use my 289 factory 4 barrel intake on the 1980 302?

5. do I use the same flywheel? I'm using the same C4 tanny.

6. it has electronic distributor and my 1965 is not. can I use old style?

thanks for any and all help.

Hard to get these answers when you are in the middle of GM country.




Michigan Rick
 

Last edited by Michigan Rick; Sep 24, 2009 at 09:10 PM. Reason: forgot something
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #2  
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 12
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
1. does the 302 have same firing order? YES

2. does the distributor go the same direction ? YES

3. do they make a right side exiting water pump? Same water pump as 289

4. can I use my 289 factory 4 barrel intake on the 1980 302? YES

5. do I use the same flywheel? I'm using the same C4 tanny. Just got to make sure it still uses 28 oz balance. In 1981 they changed to 50 oz and mixing them will cause a big vibration.

6. it has electronic distributor and my 1965 is not. can I use old style? YES
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 12:45 AM
  #3  
Stephen67's Avatar
Stephen67
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 23
Why not switch to an 351w? Uses all the same stuff as a 302 or 289, and you get 49 more cubic inches ^_^

I currently have a 302 in my Mustang, great engines, but when I'm bored some day a stroked 351...
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
jaye's Avatar
jaye
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 0
From: S.C.
Rick are you planning on ditching the electronic distributor and useing the old style points? I would stay with the electronic distributor. I had points on my 71 302 once I changed over to electronic it ran and responded much better.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #5  
IndyGTA's Avatar
IndyGTA
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Birdseye IN
I'm with Jaye on this one, leave the Duraspark in and forget about it
Mark
 

Last edited by IndyGTA; Sep 25, 2009 at 07:51 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #6  
Michigan Rick's Avatar
Michigan Rick
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Owosso Michigan
I already have the Pertronix stuff in my distributor and coil. That's the only reason for using that and I like the look of it being smaller.


Thanks alot for the info guys very much appreciated.

My harmonic balancer looks bigger on my 302 but the numbers read 1980....it is 4 bolt for the pulley and has a big groove in it........and the timing marks are about 3 inches long on the edge compared to the 289's timing marks are about 1 inch long. Does that help decide if it is the right balancer? I took it off the dirty old motor in the first place but I guess that doesn't make it right.

It's kind of a joke in our truck club cause all the other guys have big blocks of some brand or another but when we do a tour they get gas every 2 hours and I get gas at every other stop..... One guy says the cheapest part of hot rodding is the rubber! One guy always jokes and says his starter on his truck is bigger than my engine. Funny stuff.

Michigan Rick
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #7  
Michigan Rick's Avatar
Michigan Rick
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Owosso Michigan
My harmonic balancer looks bigger on my 302 but the numbers read 1980....it is 4 bolt for the pulley and has a big groove in it........and the timing marks are about 3 inches long on the edge compared to the 289's timing marks are about 1 inch long. Does that help decide if it is the right balancer? I took it off the dirty old motor in the first place but I guess that doesn't make it right.

ANY IDEAS ON THIS???
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 08:46 AM
  #8  
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 4
From: South west Idaho
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Michigan Rick
My harmonic balancer looks bigger on my 302 but the numbers read 1980....it is 4 bolt for the pulley and has a big groove in it........and the timing marks are about 3 inches long on the edge compared to the 289's timing marks are about 1 inch long. Does that help decide if it is the right balancer? I took it off the dirty old motor in the first place but I guess that doesn't make it right.

ANY IDEAS ON THIS???
I had the same setup you are trying , 66 / 289 parts on 80 / 302 . wrong year it turned out to be an 81 from a late built 80 pickup . I sold engine and got a 77 302 , everything fit and worked fine , no more vibration . The person I bought the first engine from never new as he bought the truck new at the end of 1980 close out sale , FOMOCO just stuck it in and we never checked the numbers out on the vehical I.D . I hope you have better luck .
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
1963/68 289: There are THREE different harmonic balancers.

1968/80 302: There are FOUR different harmonic balancers.

No 302 harmonic balancer has a 1980 ID number marked on it.

Does the 289 have an aluminum or cast iron waterpump?

If it's aluminum, it is not the same waterpump as a 302...nor is it the same waterpump as a late 1965 & 1966/68 289.

With an aluminum waterpump, (used 1963 thru early 1965), the timing cover is not the same, either.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #10  
Michigan Rick's Avatar
Michigan Rick
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Owosso Michigan
harmonic balancers

Bill........thanks ..it is an aluminum water pump. Always ticked me off it was expensive compared to cast.

How can I tell what stuff is on the 289 and the 302 for weights of the harmonic balancer. I would like to use my flywheel from the 289 plus the C-4. The 302 is 1980 from a Galaxie.


Michigan Rick................appreciate the help!
 

Last edited by Michigan Rick; Sep 28, 2009 at 07:04 PM. Reason: more info
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #11  
BlueOvalRage's Avatar
BlueOvalRage
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 22
From: Oxford, Indiana
Club FTE Silver Member

Find and post the part number/engineering number in its entirety from the 302 balancer. Either I, Bill, or somebody else can decipher from that what crankshaft imbalance it is for. If it is for the 1980 and earlier 28 oz. imbalance crankshaft, then there is no reason that you can't reuse the balancer and flywheel off of the 289.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 06:00 AM
  #12  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Michigan Rick
Bill........thanks ..it is an aluminum water pump. Always ticked me off it was expensive compared to cast.

How can I tell what stuff is on the 289 and the 302 for weights of the harmonic balancer. I would like to use my flywheel from the 289 plus the C-4. The 302 is 1980 from a Galaxie.
If you have an aluminum waterpump, the timing cover is also aluminum. The bell housing has five mounting holes.

This 289 engine block was only used from 8/1962 thru 8/22/1964. These parts will not fit the later block.

From production date 8/23/1964, the 289 has a cast iron pump, cast iron timing cover, the bell housing has six mounting holes.

btw: When I said early 1965 inre to the aluminum waterpump, I was refering to 1965 Mustangs, as the cars went on sale nationwide on 4/23/1964.

btw, part II: Considering the dates this block was used, are you sure it's a 289 engine? It could be a 260.

The 260 harmonic balancer (marked: C4OE-6316-A) and C4 flywheel (160 teeth) are not the same as a 289 uses.

The 260 was available from 8/1961 thru 8/22/1964.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 08:46 AM
  #13  
havi's Avatar
havi
I'll have the Roast Duck
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,622
Likes: 110
From: Northshore, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
That bellhousing bolt pattern will decide what you'll be doing. Do you have the 1980 trans as well?
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #14  
Michigan Rick's Avatar
Michigan Rick
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 227
Likes: 1
From: Owosso Michigan
motor numbers

my 289 numbers are............C5AE-----6015E


my 302 numbers are............E0AE-------D3C



sock it to me............................



Sorry someone said that today and I had a bad moment with it.


Michigan Rick








thanks for the help!
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 03:48 AM
  #15  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Michigan Rick
my 289 numbers are............C5AE-----6015E

my 302 numbers are............E0AE-------D3C

sock it to me............................

Sorry someone said that today and I had a bad moment with it.
The same engine casting number was used for 260's and 289's.

Sock it to me: Catch phrase from the 1960's TV show: Laugh In.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE