Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

1977 F150 with 400 and C6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
derherr65's Avatar
derherr65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
1977 F150 with 400 and C6

I'm slowly getting a 77 F150 with 400 engine and C6 transmission back on the road. Factory A/C, PS, PB, long bed, regular cab, dual tanks. It had been sitting for 5 years after a previous owner attempted a rebuild. I bought it for $500. The engine was freshly rebuilt but locked up with rust and some cylinder pitting, the trans looks freshly rebuilt, the rear axle looks good(given the 2.75 open diff and that I drive a lot of highway), the cab is nearly rust free, the seat cover is shot, the bed has no rust holes, the radiator was shot, thermal fan clutch shot, hood has bad rust, whole brake system shot, suspension unknown, one gas tank shot, radio gone, guages shot, steering coupler shot, windshield cracked, and a cowl vent full of everything you can imagine including snake skins. The good news is that the previous owner removed all the pollution control, as far as I can tell.

I rebuilt the engine with a 600cfm 4V carburetor and edelbrock performer intake, retimed the distributor, thinking about changing out the old bench with a newer leather one, thinking about rhino lining the bed and cab floor if possible, got the biggest non-aluminum radiator I could, thinking about an electric fan, undecided on the hood still, replaced the whole brake system, waiting for a drive to test the suspension, replaced one gas tank, thinking about what to do for a radio, replaced the whole guage assembly, new steering coupler, windshield glass, added a spare tire under the rear tank, and applied a generous amout of high pressure air to the cowl vent.

I should have the truck running this December. I have two performance goals. First, a good daily driver that can tow a boat when needed. The second, without compromising #1, is to beat my best friend's 1971 datsun 240Z in a fair 1/4 mile drag race.(about 16.5 seconds) My 1965 mustang is no longer a fair competitor, and winning in a 77 F150 would be a hell of a laugh.

So, any comments or suggestions? How do I drop the quarter mile time without hurting towing or daily driving? What's a good way to get a 2 drink holder in one of these trucks? How does the C6 work in stock form? Does it need a shift kit? If so what kind? What fuel mileage can I expect?(light foot, not lead foot) Any common problem areas with 77 F150s? Problems with 400 engines?(mine is not the bock cracking one)
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
hazmatt9777's Avatar
hazmatt9777
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
You wont get much over 11-12 mpg if any.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:11 AM
  #3  
Pre'80's Avatar
Pre'80
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
With a 140hp 400, you better have a 10 second car tow you for the 1/4 mile. You can check out the engine forum for tips on building the 400 up, but you will be doing a lot of work and spending serious coin to do it. Best bet is a 460. You will gain lot's of hp for a modest price, and most likely pick up a mile or two per gallon in mileage. Reliability will be top notch too. The other option would be a 302. You would need a different tranny too, but the 302 is low cost to mod, and will easily get you into the 15's without heavy mods.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
derherr65's Avatar
derherr65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
Oh, I forgot to mention an bargain brand cam modeled after the edelbrock performer cam, new timing set to get the cam straight up and dual exhaust.

Hazmatt9777: Yeah, I kinda guessed mileage would be about 12. I've heard a rumor that some shift kits will gain mileage. Is this true? And that a 460 would get 1-2 mpg better than a 400, can this be right?

Pre'80: I love the Tow Car suggestion! It seems odd that you'd gain a lot of performance with a 460 though. It's only 60 cubes and weighs another 250lbs. And REALLY odd that you'd get better gas mileage. As for the 302... not enough engine. I've pretty much decided a 351 is the smallest engine a F150 should have, unless it's an old flathead. Besides, how would a low reving 302 out pull a 400?
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 726
From: Calgary Canada
302 isn't enough engine if you plan on hauling with this truck. The 400 is a fine engine, once it's had a little work done to it. There's a great article here (https://www.ford-trucks.com/article/...00_Engine.html) that will help with your engine work.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #6  
derherr65's Avatar
derherr65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
One of the build articles I'm fond of is at http://www.off-road.com/ford/flashback/400_power.html
They have good suggestions for power with an eye on cost/benefit.

Does anyone know of a shorty header for this truck?
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #7  
77300i6's Avatar
77300i6
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 2
From: Lewistown, PA
NPD sells drink holders that fits into the ashtray slides.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #8  
hazmatt9777's Avatar
hazmatt9777
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by derherr65
Pre'80: I love the Tow Car suggestion! It seems odd that you'd gain a lot of performance with a 460 though.

I dont by any means know alot, but the 400 has the longest stroke (tdc to bdc) of any gasoline motor ever (if i read right). Longer the stroke the more leverage on the crankshaft=more torque. The 302 for instance is alot shorter stroke and revs quicker and easier than Any 400. The 460 even though its only 60 cubes bigger doesnt have a long as stroke as the 400, and revs better. And alot of the 400's werent any good because of all the emission things. My fathers 78 with a 400 sounds good at idle but anything over 2000 rpms sounds like dogcrap, compared to a shorter stroke motor. The 460's had alot better head design from what I see and hear.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #9  
good 'ol ford's Avatar
good 'ol ford
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: e-burg
not ever but it is the longets stroke motor ford makes. and guess what it can be stroked even more with a kit a little out of most of our price range but it can be done. i would suggest the 400 though. put a 4bbl carb and intake cam change headers and u will have a stout motot. the 460 will get about the same as a 400 both in stock form.
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #10  
lanceh13's Avatar
lanceh13
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Iraq, (U.S. Army)
Thats 11-12 mpg is better then my something like 4 mpg...but my 428 CJ deserve's it...take a look at the pics on my gallery...my miss her...*damn army*
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #11  
haten'chevs's Avatar
haten'chevs
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: MN
You can check out my gallery and see my 77 250. I've got a 400/C6- 4bbl intake and 650 edelbrock, called comp cams and ordered the cam they recommended for what I wanted to do and I have a true dual exhaust setup with 2.5 pipe all the way back. I have a sprayed in bed liner, 5th wheel, and pretty much what everelse I thought I needed for my farm truck. I've got a home made 5th wheel with 3 trailer house axles sitting on those stupid 14" wheels SOO my 5th wheel pulls something like a boat anchor, and gives the truck a good work out, especially with 1700 gallons of water on it. But it will pull my big bumper hitch really nice (10,500 trailer on 16's). I dont have any heating issues like I thought I might (I have a brand new high capacity radiator out of a diesel if I ever do). Its geared 4:10 so thats something you might wanna look at on your 1/2 ton, BUT I'm also sitting on 33x12.5x16.5 tires which dont help me in the pulling department alot.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #12  
derherr65's Avatar
derherr65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
After a little more research I'm thinking a 3.25 differential from a junkyard and a powertrax lockright. Should be a good compromise between highway rpm(2625@70) and 1/4 mile acceleration.

Anyone have experience with the lockright?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #13  
brown79's Avatar
brown79
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
i supose an 871 blower would be a little overboard eh?


at least it will help with the low compression
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
derherr65's Avatar
derherr65
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 969
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
Lol, that thought has certainly entered my mind. For right now I'm going all motor. But a nice underhood blower could be a later project.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #15  
Pre'80's Avatar
Pre'80
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by derherr65
Pre'80: I love the Tow Car suggestion! It seems odd that you'd gain a lot of performance with a 460 though. It's only 60 cubes and weighs another 250lbs. And REALLY odd that you'd get better gas mileage. As for the 302... not enough engine. I've pretty much decided a 351 is the smallest engine a F150 should have, unless it's an old flathead. Besides, how would a low reving 302 out pull a 400?
400 and 460 come with the same CR in these years, BUT, there is little support for the 400 in the aftermarket. It costs little to nothing to go from 8.0:1 to the mid 9's all the way up to 11.0:1 CR. The 400 has about 120-140hp depending on the model, 460's were 202-216, depending on the model, in the mid to late 70's cars and trucks. That's a 25 to near 50% increase in power. The 460 in the trucks is a detuned version (bigger cc heads) of the powerhouse 429/460's of the late 60's early 70's. The 400 was built for the sole purpose of lower emissions. While a 400 can be made into a fairly powerful motor, dollar for dollar, you will get much more power out of a 460. To a certain point, fuel mileage goes up with more HP, this is why a 460, in the same state of tune as a 400, will get better mileage than the 400. The "theory" of stroke and torque, has been proven not accurate, when comparing different motors, time and time again. The only time longer stroke alway's equals more torque, is when a motor is "stroked". It's all in the design of the motor. I've seen shorter stroke motors, of the same displacement as long stroked motors, have a much bigger, and longer, torque band. Some even at much lower rpm's. The 400 might have a longer stroke, but it doesn't produce more torque, with the same amount of displacement, than a 460, becouse of the design of the motor.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE