1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

rear disc brakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-10-2005, 09:11 PM
61ford's Avatar
61ford
61ford is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rear disc brakes

does anyone make a rear disc brake conversion for a 61?im starting all the chassis work this weekend and so far i havent found any for it yet
 
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 11:35 PM
pntrbl's Avatar
pntrbl
pntrbl is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hesperia CA
Posts: 169
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
If your 61's a 1/2 ton you'd have a 9 inch rear and I know there's a ton of disc setups for that axle. Try Summit Racing for one.

If it's an F250 please disregard .....
 
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 11:36 PM
minishtr's Avatar
minishtr
minishtr is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Classic Performance Products lists a rear disc brake kit however,theres a note that says will not work with rear ends.I'm going over there tomorrow for some parts I'll ask about it.
 
  #4  
Old 11-11-2005, 02:34 AM
Sam_Fear's Avatar
Sam_Fear
Sam_Fear is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I did some extensive reading through this forum when I decided to put discs on the front of my 63. I recall a discussion about rear discs, and if I remember correctly,the final agreement was that rear discs were more trouble and cost than they were worth. I didn't research rear discs much, but, I don't recall any kits mentioned. You could get a newer 9" axle with discs already on it, but newer axles are wider.

Doing a search in this forum might be an idea.
 
  #5  
Old 11-11-2005, 02:39 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 521 Likes on 400 Posts
tons of kits made for them but in the end you notice not much difference in stopping power. sometimes less because the original system is not made to for disc brakes. it can not sustain the pressure loss so you get a spongy pedal.
 
  #6  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:02 AM
ddavidv's Avatar
ddavidv
ddavidv is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Elizabethtown, PA
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I always try to shoot this idea down. It's an unnecessary waste of money, unless you are building a show truck and want the bling or are building something capable of setting a land speed record.

Rear discs will provide much greater stopping power on the axle with no weight on it. Which means it will want to lock up sooner, putting your truck into a spin. This is why pickups stuck with rear drums until the advent of ABS.

Unlike a car, all the braking on a truck (empty) is really done by the front brakes. This is where you should place your efforts. A front disc conversion is more than adequate to provide safe, controlled braking.
 
  #7  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:08 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 521 Likes on 400 Posts
you would be better off using 1 ton booster and mc to increase brake power rather than do discs out back. up front yes but not in back.
 
  #8  
Old 11-11-2005, 07:44 AM
instig8r63's Avatar
instig8r63
instig8r63 is online now
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,521
Received 121 Likes on 94 Posts
Installed properly, rear disc systems work very well. Wilwood makes a nice set-up.
I would re-plumb the entire vehicle, making sure to use a disc/disc master cylinder.
The four wheel disc master re design delivers the extra needed volume and pressure to the rear allowing your rear disc brakes to function properly. If you attempt to use a disc/drum master on a four wheel disc system you will get poor rear brake function and experience a spongy brake pedal with a long pedal travel.
A residual valve is not necessary on a disc/disc system, when the master is firewall mounted.
 
  #9  
Old 11-11-2005, 08:53 AM
66beater's Avatar
66beater
66beater is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unlike the front, adding better brakes to the rear won't give you more stopping power. If you add bigger brakes to the front, you adjust the brake bias, or brake ballance so that you maintain the propper split. rear drums on these trucks can handle much more than they are required, so if you increas your braking ability by 20% on the front, you can still balance the system by increasing pressure to the rear. It doesn't work in reverse. your front brakes opperate at 100%, so can't increas them to match new, better rear brakes.

on a car, you normaly have a 60/40 split on front and rear brakes. the rear doing 40% of the job. But on a truck, that is more variable. Depending on bed leingth and type, the split can be from 60/40 to 80/20, but is usualy in the 70/30 range, with no load.

on normal, dry days, a drum will stop nearly as well as a disc. Its in hard, extended use and wet enough conditions to get water into the drum that the Disc is truely better. Unless you ride the breaks down mountians, or drive your truck like a rally racer, you aren't likely to get the breaks hot enough to have a problem with brake fade on the rear.

The other problem with Disc is there tendancy to lock up. balanced on a car, this is rarely a problem, but if you balance them for an empty truck, they will lock with a load in the bed. balance them for having a 500 pound load in the bed, they won't work empty, and lock at 1000 pounds.(weights for example only) The problem is the linear progression of disc versus the non linear progression of drums. to simplify, if you press on the pedal of a disc brake system, the brakes will lock at the same point each time. With a drum, the more weight on the brakes, the higher the point at where they will lock, so in effect, they can adapt to a load in the bed. This is partly why big rigs still use drums. DDAVIDV had it right, Disc didn't work for trucks untill ABS became common.
 
  #10  
Old 11-11-2005, 09:11 AM
Redmanbob's Avatar
Redmanbob
Redmanbob is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mddl A MexCans
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This was very informative, thank you all for some good reading here. I think I'll go with a power drum setup and save myself a ton of extra headaches and $$$
 
  #11  
Old 11-11-2005, 03:59 PM
61ford's Avatar
61ford
61ford is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes my truck is a half ton with a 9 inch rear end.yes its gonna be a showtruck.so the weight problem is no big deal im gonna smooth the bedfloor so nothin will ever be put back there.the stock pedal issue is no biggie bc im goin to lokar and getting some pedals from them. yes im also redoing the entire brake system.im goin with mustang 2 ifs in front.the reason why i dont like drumns is bc i have them on my ranger and everytime it rains they catch really hard,my dad has 4 wheel disc on his silverado and i can tell a big difference in driving my ranger and his truck but his does have a trailer behind it all the time maybe thats the difference.after driving mine everyday and then driving his i though it would be best if i could do that conversion since its gonna be a show truck.thats the main reason i was wanting 4 wheel disc plus itll look better.yea minishtr id appreciate any info you can give me on those setups.thank you everyone ive really learned alot.
 
  #12  
Old 11-11-2005, 04:59 PM
66beater's Avatar
66beater
66beater is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your dad's silverado will have ABS, so its an apples and oranges comparison.

But a show truck is a whole other thing! http://www.blackbirdscustomtrucks.com/index8.html#59sb this may be what you need.

If you are going to the Mustang2 front end, you might consider the ford 8.8 rear end instead of retro fitting brakes onto the 9 incher. A late model axle from an Explorer comes stock with 3.73 gears and disc brakes. Most have positraction, too. $200 from a junkyard, so way cheaper than converting your 9 inch. the 8.8 is a 29 spline axle, so same axle striength as the 9 inchers 29 splines.
 
  #13  
Old 11-11-2005, 05:54 PM
61ford's Avatar
61ford
61ford is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks 66 beater ill check on that.i have a friend who could hook me up with that axle,i looked at that website and it its kinda pricey.
 
  #14  
Old 11-11-2005, 07:03 PM
ZombieSlayer's Avatar
ZombieSlayer
ZombieSlayer is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Napa
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok so I should remove the rear discs (already on the truck when I bought it) and put on some drums?

I never paid much attention to the brake system as I am going to have it done professionally (I hate brake work).

The truck hasn't moved in 3 years and probably won't move for another year depending on income so I have time.

When it does move it will be a daily driver and will occassionally be hauling stuff.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryan a
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
1
06-03-2014 02:04 AM
bsaride
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
12-10-2005 11:19 AM
Fastronald
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
09-10-2004 11:01 PM
8crate
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
04-01-2004 01:50 AM



Quick Reply: rear disc brakes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.