Notices

differences in cabs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #1  
johnnysuede23's Avatar
johnnysuede23
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
differences in cabs

I was wondering if anyone knows if there is any difference (size wise) in the cabs of a 37 half ton and a 37 1 ton dump truck. they look the same but I don't have them side by side to compare demensions. any info would be great, by cab is to far gone to repair.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #2  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
...Welcome to Ford Truck Enthusiasts!
Stick around someone will be by shortly to answer your question.
We are happy you have chosen the best source for Fords!

Enjoy FTE....and
JOIN CLUB FTE -SUPPORT THE FORUMS!
…..See you on the boards.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #3  
45ford's Avatar
45ford
Senior User
25 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
A quick scan of the 1937 Ford Body Parts Catalog shows that the floor and the back panel pieces are different between model 77 (on the passenger car style chassis) and the bigger model 79 (on the truck chassis).

Also, the big truck doesn't appear to use the seat riser that the small truck does.

Floor and seat riser shouldn't be a problem, and I suspect that the difference in the rear panel (all at the bottom I suspect, due to the wider big truck frame) might not be apparent with a pickup bed on it.

Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
johnnysuede23's Avatar
johnnysuede23
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
so do you think i might be able to use this cab on a 1/2 ton? I'm planning a custom interior anyway. the thing i'm concerned with is the overall demensions. I'd hate to have a pickup truck with a semi truck cab! maybe i should just go take some mesurements, the problem is that it is 2 hours away. thanks alot for the info.

Originally Posted by 45ford
A quick scan of the 1937 Ford Body Parts Catalog shows that the floor and the back panel pieces are different between model 77 (on the passenger car style chassis) and the bigger model 79 (on the truck chassis).

Also, the big truck doesn't appear to use the seat riser that the small truck does.

Floor and seat riser shouldn't be a problem, and I suspect that the difference in the rear panel (all at the bottom I suspect, due to the wider big truck frame) might not be apparent with a pickup bed on it.

Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #5  
46fordtruck's Avatar
46fordtruck
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 35
From: Orange County, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Over all demensions will be the same, it's only the shape of the floor for the different frame, and pehaps from a in cab mounted gas tank (I think big trucks might have had those).
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 06:40 AM
  #6  
46achers's Avatar
46achers
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slippery Rock, Pa.
In my experiences with the 42 thru 47 Ford truck cabs..I found that they were the same. "experts" told me they were different, not so.
I doubt if ole Henry would've tooled up a seperate cab, (fenders and some other stuff are different), for your era either.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
46yblock's Avatar
46yblock
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 4
From: Southern Oregon
I have a Big Truck (2 ton) cab on my 46 1/2 ton. Also used the 2 ton front grill and short running boards.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #8  
46achers's Avatar
46achers
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slippery Rock, Pa.
About the only difference I have found on the 42/7 sheet-metal is the front fenders. Years ago I bought two NOS fenders (paid $25.00 for the pair!...this was around 1972), cleaned them up, painted them and installed, had them on for several months before I discovered the difference in wheel well openings. The wheel openings are quite a bit larger to accomodate the larger tire/wheel combo.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:12 AM
  #9  
Bill Hanson's Avatar
Bill Hanson
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: durham bridge n.b., canad
Will a 1937 1 1/2-2 ton cab mount on a 1952 1/2 ton frame? Is this a practical swap? Bill Hanson.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #10  
46achers's Avatar
46achers
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Slippery Rock, Pa.
BIG difference in the frames, as with anything else it can be done, but....
A friend used a Ford Ranger for a "donor" chassis for his 37, it worked out OK, but still required a lot of modifications.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:33 PM
  #11  
46fordtruck's Avatar
46fordtruck
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 35
From: Orange County, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Is the stock '37 big truck frame 34" wide? If so, then adapting it to the later frame may not be as difficult. The '52 frame should be 34" wide, with fairly straight rails. The '37 big truck frame is a pretty straight railed frame as well, and if it's 34" wide then you would need new mounts attached to the rails. The '37 1/2 ton was built on a passenger car frame, so it was much different than the '52 truck style frame.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #12  
Bill Hanson's Avatar
Bill Hanson
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: durham bridge n.b., canad
Would it be more practical to leave the 37 on its frame, & replace the front end with a mustang 2, and cutting the frame at the rear and installing a different rear with a 9" rear end. Bill.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 12:52 AM
  #13  
j wright's Avatar
j wright
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek oh
If the frame is in good shape and not twisted to bad I would leave well enough alone. And why cut off the rear of the frame? You can adapt a rear end easy to the frame that you have.
John
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 06:16 AM
  #14  
Bill Hanson's Avatar
Bill Hanson
Junior User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: durham bridge n.b., canad
thanks John, I would like to make the 1 1/2 ton truck into a 1/2 ton Just wondering if there is a problem retaining the original frame. It would have to be shortened somewhere due to the shorter wheel base. I have a 1952 box.
Is this a practical way to go? Bill.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #15  
46fordtruck's Avatar
46fordtruck
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 35
From: Orange County, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
If the frame is perfectly straight, and the rails remain parallelthen you could easily shorten, however, if there are areas where the rails are not parallel then you open a whole new can of worms. That would require spreading the rails and such. If you have to get into that much work, it would probably be easier to mount the '37 cab on the '52, especially since you are using a '52 bed.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE