If you were designing the perfect windshield wiper for your truck, what would you improve first?
We're TreadAuto, proud sponsor of the forum, and we're currently researching windshield wipers and real-world driver preferences.
With rain and storm season picking up in a lot of areas, we figured this would be a good time to ask people who actually deal with real driving conditions.
A few things we're curious about:
1. What annoys you most about your current wipers?
2. What's one thing you wish wipers did better?
3. Have you ever used a wiper feature that was surprisingly useful? Or maybe something you've always wished existed?
Your ideas matter. They could actually inspire real features in future products, helping make the “perfect” wiper a reality.
Thanks in advance!
I've purchased a number of either Michelin or RainX branded windshield wipers at Costco, and these wipers included a set of plastic mounting doohickies that supposedly allow the wiper to fit the attachment schemes of a number of different vehicles.
Yet, the doohickies are complicated little plastic structures that while different from each other physically, are not readily distinguished from each other in the spartan line drawing diagrams, that are sparse of instruction.
I would prefer to buy a wiper that fit only one vehicle. When I bought wiper blade assemblies from the Ford dealer, I could mount the wiper blade on the truck faster than I could open the plastic bag it came in. There was no need for instructions, because there was no choice of doohickies. There were no doohickies period. It was quite obvious how to mount the wiper assembly, as it only fit one way.
With the Michelin and RainX branded wipers, it requires shaking everything out of the package, spreading out all the complicated plastic doohickies over the hood of the car, trial fitting each doohicky on the wiper blade assembly, and/or going inside the house to get a magnifying glass and a flashlight to read the instructions written in microprint, only to find the instructions to be hieroglyphic cryptography, and deciding to continue to just wing it by trying each little doohicky insert and every possible direction until the wiper blade assemblies didn't fall off.
It is the kind of experience that makes getting wiper blades changed for you seem like a good deal after all, whereas before, I would scoff at the idea of not being able to change one's own wiper blades... which is akin to not being able to change a light bulb.
I find it much easier to use old metal wiper blade cages with flat metal rods supporting the blade, and just change the rubber blades themselves, than dealing with these new fangled one size fits all vehicles wiper assemblies that come with mix and match doohickies to have to figure out.
Fortunately, I saved all of my old Ford wiper blade cages, and have reverted to how we used to change wiper blades in the 1960's and '70's. Metal rods and rubber blades only.
Anything fancier, has also got to be easier to get my vote.
Trending Topics
Silicone rubber is the future. Costly, but far superior.
RainX is a must have. I dont bother applying it anymore. I just use their bug wash. No wipers needed, or lowest setting maybe.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I agree, the silicone blades are a great upgrade.
And I loved the RainX washer fluid, but there was a rash of posts a few years ago about RainX messing up the sensors in the washer fluid reservoirs, so I went back to the generic blue stuff to be safe. Now, when I wash my vehicle I finish with Griots Ceramic Speed Shine and make sure I put a good coat on the windshield. It seems to help bead up the water pretty good, so even in rain I don't have to use my wipers much.
Out of curiosity, if you could improve one thing beyond durability, what would it be?
I've purchased a number of either Michelin or RainX branded windshield wipers at Costco, and these wipers included a set of plastic mounting doohickies that supposedly allow the wiper to fit the attachment schemes of a number of different vehicles.
Yet, the doohickies are complicated little plastic structures that while different from each other physically, are not readily distinguished from each other in the spartan line drawing diagrams, that are sparse of instruction.
I would prefer to buy a wiper that fit only one vehicle. When I bought wiper blade assemblies from the Ford dealer, I could mount the wiper blade on the truck faster than I could open the plastic bag it came in. There was no need for instructions, because there was no choice of doohickies. There were no doohickies period. It was quite obvious how to mount the wiper assembly, as it only fit one way.
With the Michelin and RainX branded wipers, it requires shaking everything out of the package, spreading out all the complicated plastic doohickies over the hood of the car, trial fitting each doohicky on the wiper blade assembly, and/or going inside the house to get a magnifying glass and a flashlight to read the instructions written in microprint, only to find the instructions to be hieroglyphic cryptography, and deciding to continue to just wing it by trying each little doohicky insert and every possible direction until the wiper blade assemblies didn't fall off.
It is the kind of experience that makes getting wiper blades changed for you seem like a good deal after all, whereas before, I would scoff at the idea of not being able to change one's own wiper blades... which is akin to not being able to change a light bulb.
I find it much easier to use old metal wiper blade cages with flat metal rods supporting the blade, and just change the rubber blades themselves, than dealing with these new fangled one size fits all vehicles wiper assemblies that come with mix and match doohickies to have to figure out.
Fortunately, I saved all of my old Ford wiper blade cages, and have reverted to how we used to change wiper blades in the 1960's and '70's. Metal rods and rubber blades only.
Anything fancier, has also got to be easier to get my vote.
Just curious — if a universal-fit wiper could be installed quickly with clear instructions and minimal adapters, would that solve most of your frustrations? Or would you still prefer a vehicle-specific design with no adapters at all?
Trying to understand whether the issue is the complexity of installation, or the universal-fit concept itself.
















