When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Do truck owners enjoy working more with external clutch slave cylinders; as opposed to internal clutch slave cylinders where it's inside the transmission housing?
If done correctly, the slave would be replaced during the clutch replacement. Of course, that means that the clutch fluid would be serviced like the brakes [every two years] but who does that?
Obviously, if I ever have to replace the clutch, I would replace all the other things around there while I have the transmission off.
When I bled the clutch hydraulics after installing it for the first time, a lot of fluid ended up in the bell housing. It was on an internal slave cylinder on a M5OD-R1HD, which had a long extension on the bleeder port to stick out of the side of the bell housing. Even though I put a lot of teflon tape around the threads before installing it, it still leaked at the threads when I cracked it to bleed the system. If I ever have to replace that slave cylinder, I will have to drop the transmission again.
On an external slave cylinder, I can replace it without having to drop the transmission, and I can localize the leak better when I'm bleeding it.
In my experience, an external cylinder provides a lot better clutch feel. Pushing against a lever arm provides a different feedback than pushing directly against the clutch fingers.
There are advantages for everything, but in my experience, when the clutch goes out, the hydraulics are soon to follow. If the hydraulics fail, same thing. Both ways, the transmission comes out. Of course, not everyone approaches how cars/trucks repairs in the same way. They piece meal it and wonder why at some age, the vehicle is always breaking down.
As for feeling, the engineers design all that so there is no apples to apples comparison. Without a doubt, there is less parts [less to go wrong] with an internal system.
Again, nobody services a clutch hydraulic system and that is the real reason for them failing. Yeah, I know, I should not say nobody, but the party would be dull if only those that showed up services there clutch hydraulics.
As I say, if the clutch goes out, the transmission has to come out to replace the clutch, which is a great time to replace everything else, like the pilot bearing, throw-out bearing, and if applicable, the internal slave cylinder.
But I have had to replace an external slave cylinder when it started leaking, but everything else was still working. I was really glad I did not have to drop the transmission to do it. And bleeding it afterward was a lot easier than doing it on the internal slave cylinder.
I guess the one part that's not on this internal slave setup is the release fork of the external slave setup (and on other mechanical setups).
On this particular internal slave setup, the clutch pedal felt really lightweight, especially compared to my old car with the Z-bar linkage or my less old car with the cable. I can't remember how that old truck with the external slave cylinder felt.
But I have had to replace an external slave cylinder when it started leaking, but everything else was still working.
I can only suspect that the person who replaced the clutch did not replace the external slave. External or internal, when a clutch wears out, there is more than just the clutch that is worn out. Trying to eek out all the miles out of all the parts is something I totally get, but when you are working on a 30 year old vehicle, I tend t look that everything is 30 years old so to make it reliable, I replace all the wear items. Just like rear brakes, I would not just replace the shoes, it would get the cylinder too, as well as the brake hose.
If the slave prematurely started leaking, I suspect that was not really maintained.
Now, VW has a real problem with their internal slave cylinders. They fail after just a few years. But that is the experience I have.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.