When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I did find this interesting, if it is true, "The Excursion was so huge that Ford had to install a beam between the front frame rails to ensure it would run into other cars instead of over them." In other words, we will now just accordion them instead...
Well there is some truth to it. Mines big, loud, and kinda offensive but for those reasons i put it in the top 25 best vehicles ever.
Yes, exactly, that is why I purchased mine. But to be on the 25 Worst? I disagree, it is what the consumer wants and needs. If it is not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that it is the worst, don't buy it and just go get you a Prius...
Obviously greenies wrote that article. Anyone who actually has a family needs an excursion. I had a suburban and it wouldn't pull a greasy string out of a cats butt. The excursion was meant for a small targeted audience and it hit that target with precision in my opinion. I wouldn't give it up. We can haul 8 people and pull what ever we want where we want and get as good or better mileage than pickups. Whats not to like? What a bunch of crybaby writers.
Yeah the article is highly subjective. I'd say on some fronts the Excursion was a failure, like its lack of sales over time, although gas prices had a lot to do with that. I remember watching the Motor Trend TV review of the Ex back in 2000 or 1999 and thinking to myself, "Wow why the heck would Ford need a bigger SUV? They already have the Expedition?" Alas after seeing it at the NYC Autoshow that year I pretty much wanted one...
The Excursion was never meant to be environmentally friendly, small, or fast, which is the main target of the article.
By that measure the Mazda Miata would be one of the worst cars in the world because it only seats 2 people and can't tow.
... I did find this interesting, if it is true, "The Excursion was so huge that Ford had to install a beam between the front frame rails to ensure it would run into other cars instead of over them." In other words, we will now just accordion them instead...
I read an article awhile ago about a collision test between an Excursion and a sedan.
The front wheel of the Excursion ended up in the windshield of the sedan.
The front beam was added to help stop that, similar to underride guards on the rear of big rigs.
I suspect that Ford decided to add a similar beam to the back end and included the hitch receiver.
That could explain why the hitch receiver is not part of the "tow package".
The author of the article must not know the difference between a car and a truck.
One thing I've wondered, do the F250/F350s have the beams, too?
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.