Notices
General Automotive Discussion

ATTN: NumberDummy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 05:56 PM
  #1  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Question ATTN: NumberDummy

This quote is from another thread.

Originally Posted by NumberDummy

Three possible modules were used 1976/79. One is CA only, was a POS from day one!


I see you were a Parts Dept. Manager in CA so you would know. Why do you say the DURASPARK I module was a POS? Did it have a performance problem(s) and/or a high failure rate?

Wondering in W (By GOD) V-
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 01:00 PM
  #2  
Kruse's Avatar
Kruse
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 35
From: Kansas
I'm not NumberDummy, but I was turning wrenches back then, and from what I remember, they all had a high failure rate. Not only that, but they used to be really high priced. I also remember that if you saved money and bought some of the cheaper aftermarket modules, some of the circuitry was missing, like the retard spark during startup part of the circuitry. I remember Ford was trying to justify the customers buying their modules and they showed cutaway pictures of the competitors. There were lots of parts missing. California must have been the modules with the "white" plastic tabs on them, as I remember changing lots of yellow and blue ones, but I don't remember seeing too many white ones.
Before you think I'm picking on Ford, the early GM HEI modules had a high failure rate also.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #3  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Thumbs up

HEY! THANX FOR THE COMEBACK...

DURASPARK I was used exclusively in CA as it provided a hotter spark for emissions. It had a RED Strain Relief. As I am on the East Coast, I never came across one of the systems. This is the one I am interested in as some HI-PO circles say to use it and I just want to know what the failure rate was. NumberDummy mentioned they had trouble with them.

Is he still active here?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 01:38 PM
  #4  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,497
Likes: 2,810
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by KULTULZ
HEY! THANX FOR THE COMEBACK...

DURASPARK I was used exclusively in CA as it provided a hotter spark for emissions. It had a RED Strain Relief. As I am on the East Coast, I never came across one of the systems. This is the one I am interested in as some HI-PO circles say to use it and I just want to know what the failure rate was. NumberDummy mentioned they had trouble with them.

Is he still active here?
He is so active it might take him several days to get to your post. In the mean time:
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Kruse's Avatar
Kruse
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 35
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by KULTULZ
HEY! THANX FOR THE COMEBACK...

DURASPARK I was used exclusively in CA as it provided a hotter spark for emissions. It had a RED Strain Relief.
I'm in the Midwest and I never ran into a red one either. IIRC, there was one that was for high altitudes. Was it brown? Anyway, to get a hotter spark, did it increase the dwell angle or what?
IMO, there are better alternatives for a modern day ignition, but I'd still like to hear the details on the red module.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
ford2go's Avatar
ford2go
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,476
Likes: 224
From: Frequently frozen MN
some of the circuitry was missing, like the retard spark during startup part of the circuitry
I was reading about some of the first electronic ignitions. They said that that one of the common items left out of aftermarket versions was a variable dwell. Apparently, the modules in those days were touchy about the amount of dwell at a given rpm. Without the dwell adjust, they supposedly failed quickly.

hj
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 07:07 AM
  #7  
Kruse's Avatar
Kruse
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 35
From: Kansas
I'm going by memory here (and my kids DO say that I have CRS....) but at one time the Motorsport catalog offered their high performance version of the Duraspark module. I can't remember the color of the tabs on the strain relief, but I'm sure it was the blue or the yellow one. Supposedly this was the module to use for high performance. I will freely admit that I never bought one, I've never seen one in person and I have no idea exactly what features it had that made it high performance. Once again, I feel there are better alternatives.
FWIW, I have a '78 Mercury Zephyr Z7 with a 302 that still gets driven intermittently and it still has the original module. (This car will by my 460 project next year)
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 07:51 AM
  #8  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Originally Posted by Kruse

at one time the Motorsport catalog offered their high performance version of the Duraspark module. I can't remember the color of the tabs on the strain relief, but I'm sure it was the blue or the yellow one. Supposedly this was the module to use for high performance.
I bought that kit way back for a '73 RANCHERO .

What it consisted of was a MSD module in the shape of a DURASPARK MODULE. It had provision(s) for a tach drive (electrical) and a RPM control. It could not be used in any OEM harness.The kit also included an accessory DURASPARK II IGN harness. Some applications had to use a jumper wire. Had I known before buying, I would simply have hit a salvage yard for a correct DURASPARK II take-off.

The replacement module was discontinued years ago. I might have the instruction sheet hidden under mounds of crap somewhere.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 07:54 AM
  #9  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Three possible modules were used 1976/79. One was CA only, was a POS from day one!
Originally Posted by KULTULZ
Is he still active here?
You've typed 75 posts since 3/26/2002 / I've typed 44,138 posts since 11/04/2006. So it took me, as Ed said in post 4, awhile to spot this thread.

Originally Posted by KULTULZ
Why do you say the DURASPARK I module was a POS? Did it have a performance problem(s) and/or a high failure rate?
D7AZ-12A199-A .. Ignition Module-CA only ~ RED plastic square (Motorcraft DY-204) / 1977 I-6 & V8 / 1978/79 302 only.

Late 1977, early 1978: The modules installed on new vehicles were defective. 1000's of customers vehicles were parked on dealers service lots because the POS was on D99 backorder-Detroit. FoMoCo had none.

And FoMoCo didn't have any available for THREE MONTHS! When they finally arrived, were no better than before. Took another month to get modules that actually worked.

When this problem arose, I called a wrecker pal, had him put the POS on the wreckers hotline, bought every user I could find, installed them on customers vehicles.

Back then, all DuraSpark ignition modules were so prone to failing, that Ford techs referred to them as NeverSpark!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 08:01 AM
  #10  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Originally Posted by Kruse

I'm in the Midwest and I never ran into a red one either. IIRC, there was one that was for high altitudes. Was it brown? Anyway, to get a hotter spark, did it increase the dwell angle or what?

IMO, there are better alternatives for a modern day ignition, but I'd still like to hear the details on the red module.

DURASPARK I (CA ONLY - 302 ENGINE)

Introduced in 1977, this system provides much higher secondary voltage to the spark plugs than does the basic solid state system. This is accomplished primarily by three changes in the system.

A special coil is used in which the internal windings have a much lower resistance than the coil used with the basic solid state ignition system. The core of the special coil is designed to accept a much higher magnetic charge from the increased current which flows through the low-resistance windings. The produces a substantially higher voltage to the spark plugs and allows the coil to reach "full charge" much more rapidly than previous systems. This coil has a unique alignment lug on the blue coil tower which prevents attachment of this coil into a basic solid state ignition system harness.

Spark intensity is greatly increased - especially at higher engine RPM. If this coil were allowed to run with the same dwell control (maximum charging time) as the basic solid state systems, the coil would, at low engine RPM, overcharge and overheat. For this reason, a "current-control" circuit is needed with this system.

-Sourced From FORD Training Material
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 08:03 AM
  #11  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Thumbs up

THANX BILL!

So the actual module's reliability was never improved?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 08:39 AM
  #12  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by KULTULZ
THANX BILL!

So the actual module's reliability was never improved?
POS from day one, were installed in all 1977's with I-6's & V8's, 302's in 1978/79's only.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #13  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Further Info On MOTORSPORT MSD DURASPARK CONVERSION-

FORD RACING DURASPARK II

M-12199-C301 EXTRA PERFORMANCE IGNITION MODULE


1st Connector-

Orange to Dist Stator +
Violet to Dist Stator -
Green to Coil -
Black to Ground (Dist)

2nd Connector

Red Ignition 12 volts
White is used for tach output.

M-12029-A302 IGNITION COIL

M-12071-A301 Ignition Wiring Harness

NOTE: M-12199-A301 Blue Strain Relief Module
M-12199-A302 Brown Strain Relief Module

The module has two externally small loops of wire, one blue the other red.

If you have an 8 cylinder, do not cut any loops. If you have a 6 cylinder, cut the red loop. If you have a 4 cylinder, cut both the red and blue loops.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 10:08 AM
  #14  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 218
From: W (BY GOD) V
Question

Originally Posted by NumberDummy

POS from day one, were installed in all 1977's with I-6's & V8's, 302's in 1978/79's only.
Were the later replacement modules (RED) reliable at all or did the failures continue?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
POS from day one.
Thankfully, not all 1977/79's sold new in CA came with the RED POS .. most used the BLUE module.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
78Hayride
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Jan 8, 2019 04:44 PM
Timehunter
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Apr 4, 2018 12:41 PM
dwhawkins89
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
Dec 22, 2017 07:07 PM
bert cook
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Jan 26, 2013 07:49 PM
bobbarob
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
3
Jun 2, 2003 12:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE