1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

289?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-03-2010, 01:28 PM
Terpfords's Avatar
Terpfords
Terpfords is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you consider Bob Gliddens motors 460's - NA
 
  #17  
Old 10-03-2010, 01:44 PM
79 f350ts's Avatar
79 f350ts
79 f350ts is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southaven,Ms
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why stop at 460? stroke that beast to 514,557 go big!!
 
  #18  
Old 10-03-2010, 03:29 PM
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
jim collins is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South west Idaho
Posts: 3,038
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bamaf150
I'm guessing its a destroked 302. Found in early Broncos and Mustangs.
Not destroked and not first small block.

62 fairlane ,221 ci. 145 H.P. 2 BL carb


62 fairlane midyear ,260 , 164 H.P.

63 fairlane 289 , 271 H.P

Plus high perfomance 289 before it was dropped .

Then along came the 302 and 351 W.
 
  #19  
Old 10-03-2010, 03:44 PM
79 f350ts's Avatar
79 f350ts
79 f350ts is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southaven,Ms
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what a can of worms you opened Dom! started out with 289 went all the way up to bigblock 460's and NOW we are back past 289's down to 221's . i guess we'll be discussing y-blocks next! ha ha ha ha
 
  #20  
Old 10-03-2010, 04:52 PM
77mud's Avatar
77mud
77mud is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,005
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I dont got the dime to coin out for that bigga engine yet... but a 466 is in the near future
 
  #21  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:23 PM
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
jim collins is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South west Idaho
Posts: 3,038
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 79 f350ts
what a can of worms you opened Dom! started out with 289 went all the way up to bigblock 460's and NOW we are back past 289's down to 221's . i guess we'll be discussing y-blocks next! ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha

FORD
239
256
272
292
312

LINCOLN
279
302
317
332
341
368

Sorry guys I got bored today and needed something to do .

Should I start on the FE ? O.K i'l leave it along.
 
  #22  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:38 PM
Big_Dom's Avatar
Big_Dom
Big_Dom is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terpfords
No 460 ever won a title !





I new that comment would stir some people up! HA HA
like!

and guys i wasn't thinkin bout puttin one in my truck, i was just curious because it seems every ford v-8 i see on online is either a 289 from a stang or a 351w/m.
 
  #23  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:43 PM
79FordBlake's Avatar
79FordBlake
79FordBlake is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wingo, Ky
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
289's are great little engines(yes they are small but......they are great regardless). They go and go and go.
All my pickups have 302s in them. Wouldn't trade them for anything. They last forever and a simple upgrade of the rod bolts or better yet aftermarket rods these babys will turn!! lol.
One of these days Ill get a truck that has an FE in it but until then the little 302 actually doesn't have much trouble at all carrying around my 6,000 pound antique tractor. Even with it loaded down that much it still gets better mileage than a 460.

When I say one day ill have a truck with an FE engine thats what I mean. I want a truck that came stock with it because I won't take my 302 out and transplant it with something else. Just kinda my preference I guess, I like trucks that have the correct size engine they left the factory with.
 
  #24  
Old 10-04-2010, 04:56 PM
79 f350ts's Avatar
79 f350ts
79 f350ts is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southaven,Ms
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey Jim, dont forget the LEM 383 and 430 Marauder motors! (sorry couldnt help myself lol)
 
  #25  
Old 10-04-2010, 07:44 PM
Ken(Ark)'s Avatar
Ken(Ark)
Ken(Ark) is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jim collins
Not destroked and not first small block.
62 fairlane ,221 ci. 145 H.P. 2 BL carb
62 fairlane midyear ,260 , 164 H.P.
63 fairlane 289 , 271 H.P
Plus high perfomance 289 before it was dropped .
Then along came the 302 and 351 W.
The 221,260, and early 289's had a 5 bolt bell housings

289 & 302 use the same pistons but the 289 uses shorter rods and of course a shorter stroke crank .

289 blocks have a shorter skirt so a longer stroke 302 crank is not desirable .

The older 289 & 302 two piece seal cranks will fit in a newer one piece seal roller block if the rear oil slinger lip is ground off .

Most stock heads have terrible flow numbers .

A 289 crank and rods in a roller block (w/ roller cam & lifters) with a little exhaust porting would be a feisty combo , but not for a full frame pick up truck .

As it is a 200 or less horsepower 302 with low torque numbers is not the ideal motor .
 
  #26  
Old 10-04-2010, 07:55 PM
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
jim collins is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South west Idaho
Posts: 3,038
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken(Ark)
The 221,260, and early 289's had a 5 bolt bell housings

289 & 302 use the same pistons but the 289 uses shorter rods and of course a shorter stroke crank .

289 blocks have a shorter skirt so a longer stroke 302 crank is not desirable .

The older 289 & 302 two piece seal cranks will fit in a newer one piece seal roller block if the rear oil slinger lip is ground off .

Most stock heads have terrible flow numbers .

A 289 crank and rods in a roller block (w/ roller cam & lifters) with a little exhaust porting would be a feisty combo , but not for a full frame pick up truck .

As it is a 200 or less horsepower 302 with low torque numbers is not the ideal motor .
I knew all that ,but I thought I would shut up and not be accused of Don't ask me anything about chevy or mopar. I like my little 289 better than the 302.
 
  #27  
Old 10-04-2010, 08:02 PM
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
jim collins is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South west Idaho
Posts: 3,038
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 79 f350ts
hey Jim, dont forget the LEM 383 and 430 Marauder motors! (sorry couldnt help myself lol)
I know about the Marauder , but not the 383, when did it come out and what was it found in. I had some cousins in the ozarks that allways had to have a 430 marauder for there dirt track racing , that was a long time ago.OOP's sorry. JIM
 
  #28  
Old 10-04-2010, 08:48 PM
1977f150xlt's Avatar
1977f150xlt
1977f150xlt is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
i would personally just go with a 302w, unless you already have a 289, or you can get a really nice 289 HIPO

otherwise just find a nice 302w, the reason i love these engines so much is the amount of power for its size, a 460 weighs around 720 pounds, a 302w with a aluminum intake weighs around 430 pounds, so you save about 300 pounds of weight with a small block 302w vs. a 460, and you get the benefit of the Mustang world for aftermarket parts, plus if you go automatic you can go with a 4-speed AOD automatic transmission, and gain some MPG numbers,

so basically you can do a lot more with a 302w for the money, of course you can sink money into any engine, but its easier when Mustang guys pay for the parts, then you can buy the parts off them when they think of upgrading and they've already done everything with the 302w, so they have the aftermarket parts and knowledge,

I've grown up with the 302w, I've loved the engine in every application its been in, from Broncos to Cougars, to Mustangs, to Thunderbird's to E-series Vans, and F-series trucks, and the Panther sedans, its a great engine, and i am a fan,

-Brent
 
  #29  
Old 10-05-2010, 05:22 PM
79 f350ts's Avatar
79 f350ts
79 f350ts is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southaven,Ms
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jim collins
I know about the Marauder , but not the 383, when did it come out and what was it found in. I had some cousins in the ozarks that allways had to have a 430 marauder for there dirt track racing , that was a long time ago.OOP's sorry. JIM
smaller version of the 430 in mercury for 58 not sure other years. Had 2 versions with 312 and 330 horses. How bout the 400 horse super marouder with tri power? BIG power for 1958
 
  #30  
Old 10-06-2010, 07:06 AM
jim collins's Avatar
jim collins
jim collins is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South west Idaho
Posts: 3,038
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 79 f350ts
smaller version of the 430 in mercury for 58 not sure other years. Had 2 versions with 312 and 330 horses. How bout the 400 horse super marouder with tri power? BIG power for 1958
They called it the "super marader" but I don't remember the tri power, but then that was a long time ago. They ran it a lot until one of them rolled it one time to many and had to put it out in the scrap yard.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.