Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

96 f150 4.9l swap to 5l or 5.8l

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-05-2010, 04:09 PM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by polarismuddman
I can't wait for the response to this one Lew, leave room for me on your bandwagon!
...Will do !! , i like the 302s , had alot of mustangs & trucks with them , great motor that responds well to upgrades....
 
  #17  
Old 11-05-2010, 04:42 PM
polarismuddman's Avatar
polarismuddman
polarismuddman is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central, Florida
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it does......I love the one in my truck.
 
  #18  
Old 11-05-2010, 07:43 PM
CJM8515's Avatar
CJM8515
CJM8515 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Freehold
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I dont like the 302 in stock form b/c I need the truck to haul heavy loads and tow heavy things. The 302 revs way to high for this and doesnt make enough low end torque.

Ok so you can dump tons of cash into it and it performs, still doesnt have that lowend torque you want b/c it likes to sing at higher rpms imho. Gears, headers, intakes, etc are nice and do add power but your still trying to make the thing work to hard. Nab a 5.8L and you already have the power and you dont have to do a thing. Plus you get maybe 3-5 mpg better? Why bother...

I had a 5.0 F250, it had 3.73 gears and was a 4x4. I tried to tow 5000lbs and it was absolutely horrible. Had a 92 F250 with the inline 6 and ZF and it hauled better, had a 95 F250 with the 5.8L and imho besides the diesel it was the best of the bunch. I drove a 96 E250 with the 5.0 and it had about 1000lbs or so in and...it sucked...

Now if you just want a truck to beat around in, maybe go to home depot every so often and maybe tow something small a 5.0 may work for you.
 
  #19  
Old 11-05-2010, 07:48 PM
thndrroad70's Avatar
thndrroad70
thndrroad70 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Easter Island
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I would never replace a 4.9 with any V8 in one of these trucks........ you will never beat the reliability of what you already have stuck between the front fenders of that truck........
 
  #20  
Old 11-05-2010, 08:18 PM
polarismuddman's Avatar
polarismuddman
polarismuddman is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central, Florida
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO if you're going to continue to bitch about the 5.0 then why do you continue to purchase it knwoing it's not going to give you what you want.....I have 400 bucks in my "junk" motor. I have no trouble towing anything, catchin the wheels spinnin on DRY pavement, or dragging a CC longbed diesel out of a mudhole...with 3.55 gears. Each one of these engines has their place and everyone has their opinion on each one. Unfortunately your's is a nasty one time and time again. Do yourself a favor and instead of acting like a dick keep your mouth shut. You wanna tell someone that a particular engine is junk do it in a nicer way. Kinda like Patrick Swayze's motto in Roadhouse.
 
  #21  
Old 11-05-2010, 08:52 PM
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
big-ugly is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: town of less than 200 ppl
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a little experience with both engines. If you are looking for something that can pull without hesitation then the 351 wins hands down. If your looking for a great DD then the 302 wins because of the mpg. I get around 12 mpg out of my 1989 f150 with a 351w/c6, while my dad gets around 17 with his 1992 f150 302/e40d. We pull car and cattle trailers, as well as various farm equipment and machines. We both head straight for my 351w when it comes to pulling. That being said, the 302 has completed the same tasks, just with a bit more drama. They are both great engines IMO, and are both very reliable. I think that if you are shooting for an upgrade, then I would suggest a 351w. I do not have experience with a 300, but I hear great things. I also hear that comparitively they will beat the 302 in towing, but this is just what I read. I hope that something I said can help you, I like to ramble a bit.
 
  #22  
Old 11-06-2010, 06:07 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ford made alot of diferent trucks with alot of motor choices , so everone has there own opinion , i have had the I 6 , 302 & 351 over the years & they all have there place, all depends on what you use them for . I don't have a problem with any of them , The I 6 & 351 do good with heavy loads , but lack in the higher rpms on the highway , the 302s have a lighter rotating assambely & make more power in the higher rpm range , but they can run 3000 rpm with ease , the gearing on these trucks have alot to do with it , alot of the 302s came with 308 - 355 gears that are great on the highway in a light truck , i like the lower gears in the 302 , you just need to keep them in there power band , the aftermarket support for the 302 is good , thats what i like , you can change them from a mild truck motor to a tire shreader....Lew
 
  #23  
Old 11-06-2010, 01:10 PM
polarismuddman's Avatar
polarismuddman
polarismuddman is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central, Florida
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, mine got cursed with a 3.31 open carrier.......love the 3.55 posi in it now. And the 302 aftermarket is one of my favorites as well, even though the Windsor is starting to get a big aftermarket itself.
 
  #24  
Old 11-21-2010, 03:17 PM
grabberblue's Avatar
grabberblue
grabberblue is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am also looking at swapping out my 4.9 to a 5.8. i have a 96 with 4.9 and a 5 speed tranny.
is it just the engine harness to the main plug on the fender that needs to be changed, or does all the wiring in the dash need to be swapped out as well? i would also assume the instrument panel needs to be swapped out as well, due to the tach?
 
  #25  
Old 11-21-2010, 05:01 PM
Country705's Avatar
Country705
Country705 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Campton
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jleal_21
i have to remember that the 5.0 came with two tranny combos. one with the e4od and one with the aod. if you have a truck with the aod you will feel the difference in power too. the aod is the tranny used in the crown vics and marquis cars so its not as tough as the e4od. if you have a truck with the 5.0 and a e4od tranny combo you should be alright. i know cuz i have owned several of these trucks in both configurations.
My truck came with a 4r70w and i find that its just as strong as a e40d tranny. now that it has 230,000 miles it is starting to slip but it still getting the job done.
 
  #26  
Old 11-21-2010, 05:20 PM
thndrroad70's Avatar
thndrroad70
thndrroad70 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Easter Island
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grabberblue
i am also looking at swapping out my 4.9 to a 5.8. i have a 96 with 4.9 and a 5 speed tranny.
is it just the engine harness to the main plug on the fender that needs to be changed, or does all the wiring in the dash need to be swapped out as well? i would also assume the instrument panel needs to be swapped out as well, due to the tach?
No you dont have to touch the dash (the Tach will work fine).. the engine wiring and the Computer is all that needs to be changed, just make sure you get everything from the same year truck or atleast what the interchange calls for on the harness as they did change pin placements in the bulkhead from year to year....
 
  #27  
Old 11-21-2010, 05:58 PM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
6CylBill is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's like this.

The 300 has good low end torque and poor top end power.

The 302 has good low end torque and good top end power.

The 351 has great low end torque and good top end power.

The 302 will kick tail with a 4.10 gear behind it. The 300 needs a good medium gear to give it power in both the low and top end. 3.55's work great. The 351 has lots of guts. A 3.55 gear is all it needs, too.

A built 300 will kick tail all day long in the low and top end. So will a built 302. A built 351 would rip a 300 and 302 in half.

It all depends on the gearing, transmissions, weight, use and if the engine is stock or not. Stock to stock, with 3.55's, I would prefer a 300 for a truck motor.

With all this said I love the 302. Aside from the 300 I would have a 302.

I'm a fan of Inline Six's, that's just me. I just think I6's are cool. I also like thinking my inline can keep up with the V8's as far as working the truck.
 
  #28  
Old 02-21-2011, 01:26 PM
|WYG|SS's Avatar
|WYG|SS
|WYG|SS is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was thinking the same thing. to swap to a 5.8l. my parents have a crate 351 in their 88e150 i would like to take out and swap it if they get rid of it. it only has 20k on it but just needs a minor rebuild cause its been sitting for years.

in my 93 f150 and 86 bronco i have the 4.9l and to be honest i beat the hell out of the one in the f150 and it keeps on going. i did swap 3.55ls gears into it and it does better.

im still debating on doing the swap cause the 300 is still a good motor and good for towing.

i did buy a 5.0l to swap in with a zf trans but the 5.0l needs everything redone including new heads but i might just junk the 5.0l and just stick the zf behind my 300.
 
  #29  
Old 02-21-2011, 04:32 PM
big-ugly's Avatar
big-ugly
big-ugly is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: town of less than 200 ppl
Posts: 8,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That ZF trans behind a 300 with some decent gears in the rear is an awesome combination. 6cylBill can tell you a lot about which gears would be the way to go, I think he has done a couple swaps (at least one for sure). I won't tell you what to do with your truck, but if you were going to be pulling heavy loads for long distances, the 351 will do it easier, and faster. The 300 will have no problem moving a heavy load, just remember that it will take a little longer to get there.

(I am not a fan of the 302, the one in my dad's truck has given us a ton of trouble, and it only has about 130k miles on it..)
 
  #30  
Old 01-22-2013, 08:07 PM
John Kaiser's Avatar
John Kaiser
John Kaiser is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HELLO EVERYONE I JOINED THE GROUP AND WAS READING WHAT EVERYONE WAS SAYING HERE AND WAS WONDERING WHAT YEAR OF 5.8 ARE WE TALKING ABOUT .....
 


Quick Reply: 96 f150 4.9l swap to 5l or 5.8l



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 AM.