Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

4x4 helpful for towing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #31  
J_E_Summit's Avatar
J_E_Summit
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,339
Likes: 0
From: Smithers, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Kajtek1
Food for toughs.
How many semi tractors have you seen with FWD as well?
I don't know about other areas, but around here, most semi's can lock up all 2 or 3 drive axles. Really don't need front wheel drive when you got 8 to 12 wheels with power to them
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #32  
dchamberlain's Avatar
dchamberlain
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,180
Likes: 669
From: Scio, OR
Club FTE Silver Member

How many semi tractors go off road? I'm not sure how semi-tractors are relevant.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #33  
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,404
Likes: 52
From: Wheatland, Mo
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by dchamberlain
How many semi tractors go off road? I'm not sure how semi-tractors are relevant.
hehe Around here...In the winter.... LOTS of em! Now it may not be intentional...but they try.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #34  
Tadashi's Avatar
Tadashi
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
That was my initial thought that the 4WD would increase fuel consumption. Usually, I agree with the addage best have it an not need it but is it worth the extra fuel consumption over the life if I only use it once (if even). My last truck I only used the 4WD in Kansas during an ice storm. I now live in Texas and do not plan on visiting any state with ice and snow then again the wife may veto that.

So if the 4WD is locked in 2WD then it should not affect fuel economy? Only AWD sees the fuel consumption since they cannot unlock their hubs?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #35  
sammy77's Avatar
sammy77
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
Personally, I can't live without 4x4 when towing. I have been caught in blizzards that cut visibility down to 25ft on non plowed roads on numerous ocassions towing our 4place trailer. I would never imagine not having it...
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #36  
Grumpy Moose's Avatar
Grumpy Moose
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Anchorage, Alaska
Originally Posted by Wagion
You just need to take it out of 4WD turn the steering wheel to lock one side or the other and stand on the gas truck will turn on a dime.
LOL, I've been known to do that from time to time in a tight parking lot or drive through. I guess they call that drifting, Alaska style!
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #37  
Franko72's Avatar
Franko72
Molon Labe
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,272
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by dchamberlain
How many semi tractors go off road? I'm not sure how semi-tractors are relevant.
They're not relative, but for the records I drove a semi dump for over 10 yrs, and did quite a bit of off roading. My KW had diff lockers, and you could lock both rears together for 8 wheel drive. It worked great loaded as long as wanted to go straight... on the other hand it wouldn't move
empty... I could talk all day about trucking...I guess I miss it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #38  
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 2
From: CA Bay Area
Years ago I was working at the same place with a guy who was commuting 35,000 miles a year. He drove small pickup truck and when that got rear-ended he bought bigger one with 4WD.
When I asked him why doesn't he buy econobox for commute, he answer that he needs pickup because of his yard. His yard was 20 feet by 50 feet.
Would he drive econobox, the money he would save over the year would not only pay for Escalade twice a year to haul yard clippings, but also for Jaguar on included Las Vegas vacations.
We all do make our choices.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:11 PM
  #39  
texastech_diesel's Avatar
texastech_diesel
Token Redneck
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,331
Likes: 341
From: Breckenridge, TX
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Tadashi
So if the 4WD is locked in 2WD then it should not affect fuel economy? Only AWD sees the fuel consumption since they cannot unlock their hubs?
AWD is only on cars and SUVs, not on trucks. Older Jeep Grand Cherokees were gas hogs, and I think that kind of gave the system a bad rep for gas mileage, but yes, connecting more turning parts to the engine will cut down the MPGs.

I don't understand this whole argument that 2wd gets better gas mileage than a 4wd when it comes to trucks though. What exactly about the unit bearings increases resistance so much compared to the 2wd spindle bearings that it causes increased engine loading? When the hubs are unlocked the stub only rotates sympathetically, and the transfer case isn't pulling power from the transmission, so there's no real losses there, at least not enough to suck HP out of the engine. Nothing in the front end is being powered, it's just hanging there. If you wanted to get insanely technical, yeah, I could see maybe a few tenths of a mile per gallon, mainly from the extra 4 sq ft of frontal area that comes with a slight height difference, but finding a $5 bill on the sidewalk would cover the difference in fuel consumption for a month. You lose more mileage per tank with a heavy right foot.

This MPG thing is turning into the "2wd trucks can haul more!" joke, where people think that since the curb weight is lighter on 2wd trucks, and GVWR doesn't typically change inside cab/bed combos, that the extra 250# of hauling capacity is something worth considering when buying a truck. If you need that extra 250# so badly to come in underweight, you should probably be looking at stepping up into another truck, cause on fat Aunt Thelma tagging along could ruin your weekend if you ran into a highway cop.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #40  
jc8825's Avatar
jc8825
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth
Originally Posted by texastech_diesel
If you need that extra 250# so badly to come in underweight, you should probably be looking at stepping up into another truck, cause on fat Aunt Thelma tagging along could ruin your weekend if you ran into a highway cop.
Damn Aunt Thelma!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #41  
Pinky Demon's Avatar
Pinky Demon
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by texastech_diesel
Personally I've always felt the Twin-I beam is a disaster of an IFS, the steering setup on it is basically the same y tie rods on the TTB axles. The crossover steering on the the 4wd is a better system, and like senix said, there's nothing more stable than a solid axle with two massive radius arms, with springs you can upgrade/downgrade based on what you actually tow. Brake jobs are easier on the 4wd trucks, not that breaking a castle nut is hard, you just have to tear out the bearings, white the top hat rotor on the 4wd is a lot simpler to fix.

Plus resale is probably better on a 4wd. I'm not that much farther north in Texas (Lubbock area), and you'd never catch me or most of the guys I work with with a 2wd truck, unless it's a second or even a third vehicle. The "it's better to have it an not need it" mantra carries a lot of weight the first time you a trailer get stuck.
Until they hit a pothole or a bad stretch of on ramp loop.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #42  
seminaryranger's Avatar
seminaryranger
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 11
From: Shiner, TX
The thing I don't like about Ford's 2wd Super Duty trucks isn't the strength of the twin i-beam suspension system- it's the fact that the TIB changes camber as the suspension cycles. Much more than a double a-arm front suspension.

Think about the nature of a pickup truck. It sees dynamic loads: unloaded one day, loaded the next. As the rear suspension is loaded due to a trailer's tongue weight or simply by loading a pallet of mulch in the bed, the front suspension begins to unload as the rear is loaded. The front suspension moves upward from ride height. In an extreme case, taking a long road trip could result in some weird tire wear and strange handling.

But air bags or some sort of load leveling solution could fix that.

The TIB suspension is stout. Desert truck get some serious travel out of the basic design. But I've never had much luck with it holding a good alignment back in the mid 90's farm trucks. My front tires always seemed to wear the edges of the tread no matter how tight everything seemed up front.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2010 | 10:58 PM
  #43  
texastech_diesel's Avatar
texastech_diesel
Token Redneck
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,331
Likes: 341
From: Breckenridge, TX
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Pinky Demon
Until they hit a pothole or a bad stretch of on ramp loop.
Ford definately screwed the pooch on the steering stabilizer. But a simple dual stabilizer kit solves that problem. You're still left with a better steering set up.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 02:22 PM
  #44  
mwsF250's Avatar
mwsF250
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 11
From: Wayyy NoCal, USA
With a true 4WD like these, the mpg penalty is much less than an AWD (especially some of those horrible early "shift on the fly" or full time AWD systems in the 80's and 90's) as you are not having to accelerate and spin the front driveshaft, differential, and axles.

But, you do still have:
- The parasitic friction and fluid pumping losses in the transfer case
- Aerodynamic penalties since most 4WD are taller than 2WD
- More weight to accelerate
- Plus many folks with 4WD tend to gravitate towards bigger and more aggressive tires - which come with aerodynamic, weight, and rolling resistance penalties.

Those do add up. From my experiences, it is rarely less than 1 mpg. Usually in the 1 to 2 mpg range.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #45  
MuncieV10's Avatar
MuncieV10
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Muncie, IN
My last truck was a 2000 7.3 F250 2 wheel drive 6spd manual with 3.73 LS differential. I had it for 10 years and had no problems with it on snow or ice on the roads as long as I was careful. The only problems I had were with the 5th wheel hooked up trying to move on wet grass or slightly muddy surfaces; it just would not do it. After getting a tow a few times in those situations I decided my next truck would be 4wd. I've already had a few instances where I used 4wd in this truck with a trailer off road that I would have needed help with the 2wd truck. 4wd is about $3k more than 2wd on a new truck but it's worth it to me.

Mike
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE