Henry Ford on War
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
Here's a quote from the namesake of the forum:
My opposition to war is not based on pacifist or non-resistant principals. It may be that the present state of civilization is such that certain international questions cannot be discussed; it may be that they have to be fought out. We ought not to forget that wars are a purely manufactured evil and are made according to a definite technique. A campaign for war is made upon as definite lines as a campaign for any other purpose. First, the people are worked upon. By clever tales the people’s suspicions are aroused toward the nation against which war is desired. Make the nation suspicious, make the other nation suspicious. All you need for this is a few agents with some cleverness and no conscious and a press whose interest is locked up with the interests that will be benefited by war. Then the “overt act” will soon appear. It is no trick at all to get an “overt act” once you work the hatred of two nations up to the proper pitch.
My opposition to war is not based on pacifist or non-resistant principals. It may be that the present state of civilization is such that certain international questions cannot be discussed; it may be that they have to be fought out. We ought not to forget that wars are a purely manufactured evil and are made according to a definite technique. A campaign for war is made upon as definite lines as a campaign for any other purpose. First, the people are worked upon. By clever tales the people’s suspicions are aroused toward the nation against which war is desired. Make the nation suspicious, make the other nation suspicious. All you need for this is a few agents with some cleverness and no conscious and a press whose interest is locked up with the interests that will be benefited by war. Then the “overt act” will soon appear. It is no trick at all to get an “overt act” once you work the hatred of two nations up to the proper pitch.
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
He was a free thinker and industrial genius, both somewhat rare in anybody's world. His political sophistication during that era was somewhat tainted by the industrial side of his mind, having made large capital investments in a country eventually directed by a madman. But in his plain spoken manner he did describe what it normally takes to start a war. And history, which he described as 'bunk', always repeats itself.
New User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Henry Ford on War
Wow,
Hey George,
That's pretty good, Henry Ford was a wise man, and yet innovative.
FORD TOUGH..
p.s good research george keep me posted frank@schaefferas.com on upcoming thoughts!
Hey George,
That's pretty good, Henry Ford was a wise man, and yet innovative.
FORD TOUGH..
p.s good research george keep me posted frank@schaefferas.com on upcoming thoughts!
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Henry Ford on War
Very interesting quote. For further reading, Dr. Noam Chomsky at MIT expands on Henrys thoughts using a propaganda (media) model he developed. I would think that Henry had a ring side seat to view how a propaganda system works (Germany). That would explain his observations.
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
A ring side seat to a working model and a keen, detail oriented mind could produce excellent observations.
Trending Topics
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: southeast,usa
Henry Ford on War
They may be a "manufactured evil" . They are also a response to a very REAL evil. Henry Ford also happened to be anti- jewish.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now
Brett Foote
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals
Joe Kucinski
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
Henry Ford on War
He was also a Hitler support who funded anti-semetic publications prior to America's entrance into the war. Its one of the reasons Ford paid to have Schindler's list shown on TV without commercials. It was an acknowledgement of a tainted past.
Henry Ford funded Hitler's 1933 Election campaign. He received the Grand Cross of The German Eagle in 1938. Ever heard of the anti-semetic book "The International Jew"? Guess who... yes, Henry Ford's book.
The picture is of Henry getting his "Grand Cross Of The German Eagle".
Henry Ford funded Hitler's 1933 Election campaign. He received the Grand Cross of The German Eagle in 1938. Ever heard of the anti-semetic book "The International Jew"? Guess who... yes, Henry Ford's book.
The picture is of Henry getting his "Grand Cross Of The German Eagle".
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
I don't think Henry's ego was much smaller than that of his contemporaries. Opinated at that level is a different definition than we mere citizens can comprehend. The industrialists of that era were virtual dictators. He did revolutionize the vehicle manufacturing industry. And had some accurate observations about society.
Being married to a Jew and having Jewish family and friends, I can tell you that none drive Ford products.
Being married to a Jew and having Jewish family and friends, I can tell you that none drive Ford products.
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
Many conservative Jews, especially those from the concentration camp era, will not drive a Mercedes out of principle. Those interested in driving a quality product, regardless of tribal system politically correctness, buy Mercedes for value. As the owner/ driver of domestic trucks and a Mercedes sedan, I can't argue with that logic. Most Jews place no blame on Japan for Hitler's actions. Even conservative Jews drive Japanese cars for the value. Again, I can't argue with that. Even though I'm not a Jew, there are few domestic vehicles I'd consider buying when compared to the quality control and resale values of many imports. Maybe Henry's grandson has the mind that will put him in a position to change that. His announced affiliation with China takes him out of the regular corporate image and sounds a little like the grandfather.
Fleet Owner
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 29,941
Likes: 46
From: Drummonds, TN USA
Henry Ford on War
The most accurate description of what "WAR" is, still is credited to an obscure German Professor:
"War is an extension of diplomacy by other means"
By this definition, terrorism can be loosely framed as belonging within that group -
HOWEVER (comma) -
Even WAR itself is subject to conventions as to what is acceptable and what isn't, and lack of agreement on what "ACCEPTABLE WARFARE" constitutes seems to be what we are dealing with in the world today.
In general - the world concensus tends toward excluding non-combatants, even though in Viet Nam (American Era) threats were carried out by combatants desguised as non-combative individuals. (IE: Babies with grenades, etc...). Which led to retaliation in kind, and so on...
There is a large grey area in existance, and it needs defining even as we move forward into what is in fact the consideration of not simply non-combatant casualty justification, but MASS non-combatant casualty doctrine.
And the only justification we really have for Nagasaki and Hiroshima is the non-combatants involved in Pearl Harbor on september 7th.
There are rules.
There are patterns.
But the concept of "Gentlemanly Warfare" is an oxymoron.
We have it in our reach to modify what is acceptable and what is not.
If nothing else survives as a legacy of the twentieth century, perhaps the sparing of innocents can be made a world heritage. And yet, even in the war between the states the supposedly more civilised UNION wreaked such enormous devastation on our own country -
(the drive through the southern states to the coast, in which homes and estates were devasted even to the point of poisoning wells)
- that hatred exists within even our own northern and southern citizens to this very day.
The only thing we can hope for is change.
At the rate we've been going - without it we are all done for.
Even if the entire world views the middle east as a backwards area - I tell you what, it may be - but what have we given them to learn from?
And people will always do what they see as the things that WORK.
Now we have to revise all of that, and yet in many ways we are also guilty. If you don't believe it review your history...
We have a great deal of looking inward to do.
Not that it's any justification for putting up with a bunch of crap and threats from anywhere else in the meantime!
And I STILL want to see Bin Laden hanging from a tree.
Last edited by Greywolf; Feb 8, 2003 at 11:51 AM.
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Henry Ford on War
I still think Ford's quote, taking cid's point of Ford's first-hand experience and observations, is valid from a general viewpoint on how one starts a good-sized war in modern society.
As has often been said, there are no non-combatants in wartime. The general population, by choice or by force, are suppliers of the logistical requirements for any armed force. Ford was especially distressed by the unrestrained carpet bombing of Germany during WWII using conventional and incendiary explosives. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because his investment was being damaged.
I think you'll find little heart-felt sympathy from the majority of political leaders about abuse to civilian populations. Those positions are attained by sheer application of money and power, and often by force against their own countrymen. Not exactly a mindset that offers much room for empathy or sympathy. Armed forces are, as the saying goes, just doing their jobs as directed by those to whom they pledge allegiance.
Who do you blame? The leaders or the citizens who, for whatever rationalization, follow their direction? Chicken or egg?
As has often been said, there are no non-combatants in wartime. The general population, by choice or by force, are suppliers of the logistical requirements for any armed force. Ford was especially distressed by the unrestrained carpet bombing of Germany during WWII using conventional and incendiary explosives. Not for humanitarian reasons, but because his investment was being damaged.
I think you'll find little heart-felt sympathy from the majority of political leaders about abuse to civilian populations. Those positions are attained by sheer application of money and power, and often by force against their own countrymen. Not exactly a mindset that offers much room for empathy or sympathy. Armed forces are, as the saying goes, just doing their jobs as directed by those to whom they pledge allegiance.
Who do you blame? The leaders or the citizens who, for whatever rationalization, follow their direction? Chicken or egg?
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,873
Likes: 3
From: Atlanta GA
Henry Ford on War
The U.S.A. is a work in progress, like our founding fathers intended. It is the belief in God and the balance of left/right, liberal/conservative, Dem./Rep, male/female, immigrant/born citizen, that makes it a work in progress, a republic "equal for all".
Before WII, most people disliked or had a low opinion of Jews, blacks had to ride in the back of the bus, and women were not suppose to work and were considered vastly inferior in all aspects to men, except at making babies. If you think Henry Ford was any different in his opinions than 80% of the males in the country at the time, you are mistaken, imo. You might as well condemn all our grandfathers at the same time.
Though you can bet most American males when they walked into Hilter's death camps had a profound change of opinion and heart, that set things into motion decades later.
If we are lucky, in 60 years, "enlighten" people will look back aghast at the "normal" and "pc" things we allow in our society now.
Before WII, most people disliked or had a low opinion of Jews, blacks had to ride in the back of the bus, and women were not suppose to work and were considered vastly inferior in all aspects to men, except at making babies. If you think Henry Ford was any different in his opinions than 80% of the males in the country at the time, you are mistaken, imo. You might as well condemn all our grandfathers at the same time.
Though you can bet most American males when they walked into Hilter's death camps had a profound change of opinion and heart, that set things into motion decades later.
If we are lucky, in 60 years, "enlighten" people will look back aghast at the "normal" and "pc" things we allow in our society now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
georgedavila
General NON-Automotive Conversation
69
Jun 19, 2003 02:24 PM