Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

throttle body coolant tube broke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-10-2010, 06:57 AM
beerfart's Avatar
beerfart
beerfart is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mich
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
throttle body coolant tube broke

Have a broken coolant tube on throttle body on my 1995 f150. (5.0). Any one know how important this is. Can I just plug the lines?
Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 03-10-2010, 08:32 AM
alxsnmr's Avatar
alxsnmr
alxsnmr is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St Louis
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supposedly, the coolant passage on the throttle body is to keep the throttle body from freezing up in cold weather. If you were on a cold snowing/raining/otherwise moist day this could be a concern as the throttle body could get condensation on it as that moist air hits a cool metal surface. It could cause corrosion on the steel or aluminum that would prevent smooth operation of the throttle plates.

Of course, this is all speculation and it is your choice in repairing or plugging it off...
 
  #3  
Old 03-10-2010, 10:24 AM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2
quicklook2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
just disconnect the lines and put a tube between them.
 
  #4  
Old 03-10-2010, 10:42 AM
rainbowATF's Avatar
rainbowATF
rainbowATF is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Elyria, Ohio
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have had mine removed for two winters here in N. Ohio. I did have a tube between the hose ends and laying up against the throttle body; but, then it looked like heck and when the engines cold and pumping cold coolant????; does it really help? Maybe its important in the tundra region. Anyways I have had no driveability problems.
 
  #5  
Old 03-10-2010, 02:41 PM
Jeff Dodson's Avatar
Jeff Dodson
Jeff Dodson is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Angleton Tx.
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I disconnected mine just because. I know the fuel should be as cool as possible but yet you run a coolant line through there. I dont understand that except for the far northern states. I live in South Texas
 
  #6  
Old 03-10-2010, 06:24 PM
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
TexasGuy001 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,920
Received 206 Likes on 166 Posts
I tried bypassing mine for a little while and noticed nothing different, so I hooked it back up.
 
  #7  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:49 AM
Jeff Dodson's Avatar
Jeff Dodson
Jeff Dodson is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Angleton Tx.
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably what I will do
 
  #8  
Old 03-11-2010, 11:57 AM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2
quicklook2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
it is unnecessary in texas.
 
  #9  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:52 PM
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
TexasGuy001 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,920
Received 206 Likes on 166 Posts
I researched it a while back and the general consensus was that it was better for fuel atomization if it was connected. I figure the factory made it that way for a reason.

If I remember right. Its primary purpose was to keep the TB from icing up. Subford said that its better to leave it connected.
 
  #10  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:43 PM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2
quicklook2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
if leaking then disconnect it, if not leaking then leave it alone.

i highly doubt that it gives better fuel atomization.
 
  #11  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:56 PM
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
TexasGuy001 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,920
Received 206 Likes on 166 Posts
I believe thats what some of the seasoned FTE members said it did. There have been more than a few threads about it over the years. I don't know if it really does anything or not.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/8...nt-bypass.html

Originally Posted by subford
Ford says hoses are there to give more power as warm air will vaporize the fuel better.
You already have the more O2 from the stock cold outside air at this point so now you need to warm it.

They are not for throttle body icing, if the throttle body was to ice up it would do it long before the water temperature got up high enough to melt it.
Also the throttle body is not made with a venturi like it was with carburetors that drop the air temperature and cause icing between 33-38 degrees on humid days. So no air temperature drop with the throttle body and no icing.
 
  #12  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:07 PM
quicklook2's Avatar
quicklook2
quicklook2 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Posts: 11,289
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i think i am "seasoned" enough to say what i said.

think about it:

in cold climate this may help vaporize fuel but if the engine is hot and the air around it is also hot then the warm coolant would not be needed.

after the engine is warmed up the additional heat from the coolant will not help it and in fact may hurt it.

i am in ohio now but while living in l.a. i bypassed my corvettes coolant lines to the t.b. and it ran better then it did with it hooked up.

hope this clears my view of this up for you.
 
  #13  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:17 PM
Old93junk's Avatar
Old93junk
Old93junk is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McKenzie River
Posts: 23,849
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
I had this happen on a 5.0 in a bronco.........Pull the throttle body, drill out the broken tube/fitting, tap it 1/4 npt, buy a 90 deg. 1/4 npt brass barb fitting from a industrial parts house.........install.............Permanent, professional level repair.
 
  #14  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:29 PM
White 97 xlt's Avatar
White 97 xlt
White 97 xlt is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 4,728
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Old93junk
I had this happen on a 5.0 in a bronco.........Pull the throttle body, drill out the broken tube/fitting, tap it 1/4 npt, buy a 90 deg. 1/4 npt brass barb fitting from a industrial parts house.........install.............Permanent, professional level repair.
This is what I would do!!
 
  #15  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:52 PM
rainbowATF's Avatar
rainbowATF
rainbowATF is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Elyria, Ohio
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I considered the pipe thread and hose fittings to make a repair; however I weighed it against breaking the tap off in the Throttle body or cracking it and decided not to try. I removed the hose fitting on the intake standpipe fitting and plugged that. Then removed the T-fitting in the heater hose and replaced with longer hose. I used a piece of the T-fitting-bracket to cradle the hose to the alternator bracket as original.
 


Quick Reply: throttle body coolant tube broke



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.