Notices

Help help help help please.

Old Mar 7, 2010 | 12:34 AM
  #1  
notrite's Avatar
notrite
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Help help help help please.

I have a 1963 E-100 Econoline Truck. My In line 6 cylinder started knocking, I can't find a motor here in Oklahoma...What do I have to do to put a 302 V8 Engine in it? Already have a c4 automatic transmission in it now.

If you know how to do this please contact me: notritecby@aim.com

Thank you.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 12:35 AM
  #2  
fatdan460's Avatar
fatdan460
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,949
Likes: 1
From: utica il
should just be motormounts and exhaust
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #3  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Originally Posted by fatdan460
should just be motormounts and exhaust
The doghouse will need to be modified, which requires modifying the seat mounts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:03 AM
  #4  
Spydycarnge's Avatar
Spydycarnge
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
help help help

You don't need to find a econo straight 6 any small 6 from a 144-200 will drop right in on the current motor mounts even. look for falcons,mavericks,fairlanes, plus other fords that had these engines. I had a 65 with a 70's 200 from a maverick. I would also consider when jumping to a 302 that you consider all the space you have to work on your engine is eaten up by the size of the 302 or at least thats what it looked like to me from the pics i've seen.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #5  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
300 In line 6's are still available from the engine builders.

That 300 will push an Econoline as fast as anyone who is sane will want to go.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2010 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
66gpw's Avatar
66gpw
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,402
Likes: 1
From: Delisle/Vanscoy, Sk.
The 70's engine do not quite fit perfect. I put a 200 from a 70 Maverick in my truck. I had to relocate the motor mount on one side. Meaning I had to drill another hole on the mounting frame. That not a biggy. The hassle came for mounting a tranny to it. The transmission bolts holes were in a different location, so I had to change bell housings. I never got it back up and running. Personal matter arose.
I have articles on putting in a V8. You have to do some modifications to the doghouse on the rightside and it involves some floor cutting. The seat brackets I'm not sure of.
If you put a V8 look for a old 289 or 260 ford engine from the old Falcons, Comets Fairlanes. They may not need any modifications, because they are smaller than the 302 engine. They fit nice and snug in their old cars.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #7  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Originally Posted by 66gpw
The 70's engine do not quite fit perfect. I put a 200 from a 70 Maverick in my truck. I had to relocate the motor mount on one side. Meaning I had to drill another hole on the mounting frame. That not a biggy.
The 200 is slightly longer than the 144 or 170. Not a probelm in most Ford cars.

There are a lot of old Falcons around with good 170 blocks. Look for a 1965, because it came with the C-4.

I know of a 67 extended van in Wichita that has a running 240/C-4 that can be bought for $900. That big 6 is just as good as an early 289 HP/Torque wise.

Stay away from the 260 V-8. They have cooling issues, even when new. Once you bore them out, they are very prone to overheating. Around here, most people sell the blocks for scrap rather than rebuilding.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 04:47 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jschira
The 200 is slightly longer than the 144 or 170. Not a problem in most Ford cars.

There are a lot of old Falcons around with good 170 blocks. Look for a 1965, because it came with the C-4.
170/C4:

1965 Mustang.

1965/70 Falcon.

1970/72 Maverick/Comet.

170's will also be found in 1966/72 Bronco's, 1962/64 Fairlane's.

The 5th digit of the passenger car's VIN is the engine code: U = 170.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 18, 2010 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,481
Likes: 2,801
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 66gpw
The 70's engine do not quite fit perfect. I put a 200 from a 70 Maverick in my truck. I had to relocate the motor mount on one side. Meaning I had to drill another hole on the mounting frame. That not a biggy. The hassle came for mounting a tranny to it. The transmission bolts holes were in a different location, so I had to change bell housings. I never got it back up and running. Personal matter arose.
I have articles on putting in a V8. You have to do some modifications to the doghouse on the rightside and it involves some floor cutting. The seat brackets I'm not sure of.
If you put a V8 look for a old 289 or 260 ford engine from the old Falcons, Comets Fairlanes. They may not need any modifications, because they are smaller than the 302 engine. They fit nice and snug in their old cars.
260/289/302 are all the same size externally.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 04:58 AM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
260/289/302 are all the same size externally.
There are two different 289 blocks. The early 289's (& 221/260's) have 5 flywheel mounting holes.

The later 289's (after 8/23/1964) have 6 flywheel mounting holes.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whitetrashsmity
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Nov 14, 2011 09:30 PM
Scolesy8
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
Sep 29, 2007 06:31 PM
CODYKING
3.8 & 4.2L V6
10
Jun 5, 2007 08:11 PM
techbum
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
May 16, 2006 03:27 PM
CRJ900
General NON-Automotive Conversation
7
Dec 7, 2003 03:23 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE