Notices
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

Fuel Pump?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #31  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,316
Likes: 5,127
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by pdqford
I'm guessing that includes new wires. I do know that the Mopar 360 is very fussy about how you route the spark plug wires to prevent inducing a spark in an adjacent wire if they run parallel and close to each other.
<thread hijack mode on>
Yes new wires too, new O2 sensors and a PCM as well. BTW, it's the 3.9L which is basically the 360 with 2 cylinders chopped off. I did the routing of the spark plug wires as per the TSB even though it didn't apply to my model. Are you sensing my frustration yet? LOL
<thread hijack mode off>
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:23 AM
  #32  
jaywbalk's Avatar
jaywbalk
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
the truck does have a fuel rail pulse dampner so if you remove the vac from it nothing would happen, it's not a pressure regulator
the fuel pressure is regulated by the speed of the pump controlled by the pcm reading the fuel rail pressure temp sensor
Yeah the thing that I pulled didn't even have a return line on it. Wasn't paying very close attention. Oops! So that makes sense. By this explanation then, maybe it's the "fuel rail pressure temp sensor" or the pump? Where is that sensor? I don't see anything else on or near the fuel rail.

And pdq, thanks for the explanation! I'm looking into the EVAP purge valve because that also makes a lot of sense too.

In the mean time, the truck is still starting and idling just fine and the CEL hasn't returned since I checked the injectors.

Thanks again guys, for all of your help!
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #33  
fordtech08's Avatar
fordtech08
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by pdqford
The EVAP canister holds fuel vapors from the fuel tank in a charcoal medium. Under certain condictions (i.e, when the all-knowing PCM decides that dumping the fuel vapors into the intake will not cause a driveability issue), the PCM will activate the EVAP canister purge valve and the gaseous fuel will get sucked into the intake. If the EVAP canister purge valve doesn't shut all the way (for what ever reason) it could allow extra fuel to get into the intake when it shouldn't. (See P0172 and P0175)
the problem with that is the evap has sensors that can tell if there is a leak like the valve being stuck open, since he doesn't have an evap code then there is no leak
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 10:48 AM
  #34  
jaywbalk's Avatar
jaywbalk
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Just pulled out the EVAP Canister purge valve too. But I have absolutely no way of telling whether or not it's a problem. haha
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordf1501991
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
May 30, 2019 06:32 PM
cityjack
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
1
Jul 13, 2013 03:22 PM
Ed_B1
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
15
Jul 14, 2011 06:39 PM
Service462
General Diesel Discussion
3
Jul 30, 2009 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.