Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Which engine v10 or 5.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #16  
redford's Avatar
redford
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 23,174
Likes: 1,678
From: Stephensville WI
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by past5
.....What was the kind of load you got in your 5.4? Was it a taller than the truck one such as an high wall closed trailer or some kind of rv's? I am definitly not worrying about the 5.4 for 3500# but I wonder about the wind drag. I am not the kind of guy that need overpower for sure. I'll let the engine do it's work and I'm fairly patient with a load on the truck. I am seeing on forums many threads about the V10 not really worst on gas mileage than the V8 and finding a used 1 ton 5.4 with a minimum of options like the XLT is not really easy. I am seeing more XL that don't I am not really interested in. I see more V10 and that is why I am asking. I have lots of time to find one though, I'll be patient if the V8 is enough and is a better choice....

The gross weight of the trailer when loaded is a bit over 8000 pounds.



Yes, the trailer is taller, wider and longer than the truck. Look, I am not knocking the V-10 at all. They are great engines. It always puzzles me when I see posts stating they towed 5000 pounds with a 5.4L and had problems when I can tow 8000+ and not have problems. I sometimes feel a lot of owners use the extra power of a V-10 (or Power Stroke) to compensate for poor driving skills.

I think you should drive both engines and decide for yourself which will work for you.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 06:18 AM
  #17  
radium's Avatar
radium
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 10
From: upstate New York
Go redFord I wish I had a picture of my trailer load with my 65 hp tractor backhoe and grapple on the loader when people come up with this 5.4 is underpowered, and then maybe some video going up the mountain roads and maintaining 65 mph I just don't get it when people tell me they're flying by other people are you out of your mind pulling 9000 pounds and speeding remember you might have to stop that thing LOL, I can't imagine the gear ratio makes that big of a difference from 4.10s too 3.73 and you just verified that thanks. By your picture I'd say you make your living like me driving an hauling something every day not just once in a while it makes me laugh when I see posts like this saying it can't handle it or can't get out of its own way I should start taking pictures of my truck down of its helper springs with either vinyl tile or ceramics, then videotape driving across the Northeast some days from Albany to glens Falls, Albany to Rutland Vermont let's see now that's not too much of a up hill ride ;-) to the ski lodges in Vermont you get my point. try what I did drive both vehicles and I would also include the diesel "hands-down the most power" and then decide for yourself what you need not what you can brag about most people with diesels don't even need them, I get told every day by guys on the site I should've bought a diesel like there's in the morning they jump out with their lunchpail and hand tools as I pull up with my load of tile and I just laugh as I keep making a living with my 5.4. Take care
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 06:52 AM
  #18  
past5's Avatar
past5
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Like I said in a previous post, I am not in any hurry with a load on the truck and I'll let the engine work. I am not planing to tow more load than that. The 5.4 seem to be enough from some of your usage. So what I am seeing from all your answers is that they are two very good engines. Now it's up to me to find the better used deal. I'll try to have a look at both. I already did testdrive the 5.4 in a 2006 f-350 ext. cab long bed and felt comfortable with it, not with a load though. I also think people might over arguing the weight of a crew cab vs a regular cab. I mean how much can it represent? 400 to 600# more. These truck can tow up to 8000-9000#, I don't see ON SPEC ONLY that this 600# a big issue with a load of 3500#. I'll repeat again that I am not planing for towing more weight than that, I know that most of you guy's are using your truck way more hard than I'll do. That being said, for my exact purpose, I really still wonder what will be the better choice on fuel economy. Please nobody give me the that is a big pig and it will take a lot anyway. If you consider a difference of 2mph on a small vehicul doing around 30mph, it is not a big deal. But 2mpg while towing on a truck that is averaging 10mpg makes a 20% difference and that is a big deal for me. That can mean a very nice family activity on every trip with the money saved.

Thx to all again!
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 07:27 AM
  #19  
Tawn's Avatar
Tawn
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
When I had the 2008 F-250 Crew Cab (4 full sized doors & 6' bed), 5.4L with 3.73 gears I observed:

13.6-13.9 MPG: Flat, level ground with cruise control set at 60-65 MPH with the truck empty other than me.

12.3-12.6 MPG: City driving, without getting on it at green lights or changing lanes.

11.6 MPG: When my wife drove it (she thinks she's something of a Tony Stewart).

9.0-10.- MPG: Pulling a 21' Center Console Boat (~5000lbs). The boat has a T-Top on it so in addition to the weight I am also pulling a large parachute.

The truck had a 30 gallon tank - which requires fill ups at intervals <400 miles.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 08:23 AM
  #20  
Sand_Man's Avatar
Sand_Man
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 4
From: Rogue River, Oregon
Originally Posted by past5
Like I said in a previous post, I am not in any hurry with a load on the truck and I'll let the engine work. I am not planing to tow more load than that. The 5.4 seem to be enough from some of your usage. So what I am seeing from all your answers is that they are two very good engines. Now it's up to me to find the better used deal. I'll try to have a look at both. I already did testdrive the 5.4 in a 2006 f-350 ext. cab long bed and felt comfortable with it, not with a load though. I also think people might over arguing the weight of a crew cab vs a regular cab. I mean how much can it represent? 400 to 600# more. These truck can tow up to 8000-9000#, I don't see ON SPEC ONLY that this 600# a big issue with a load of 3500#. I'll repeat again that I am not planing for towing more weight than that, I know that most of you guy's are using your truck way more hard than I'll do. That being said, for my exact purpose, I really still wonder what will be the better choice on fuel economy. Please nobody give me the that is a big pig and it will take a lot anyway. If you consider a difference of 2mph on a small vehicul doing around 30mph, it is not a big deal. But 2mpg while towing on a truck that is averaging 10mpg makes a 20% difference and that is a big deal for me. That can mean a very nice family activity on every trip with the money saved.

Thx to all again!
You have a couple interesting points. First off is truck wieght. I rolled my '04 V10 crew cab shortbed 4x4 across the local truck scales and was shocked to find it weighed 7000 lbs. Now that was with a fiberglass cap (300 lbs?) and 1/2 tank of gas but otherwise it was empty. I have no idea what regular cab trucks weigh in at so maybe someone else will add to that. As for the difference in gas prices, I just returned from a week in the dunes and found my overall gas expenses to be about $30 round trip (300 miles one way) than when we used the Suburban. The Suburban absolutely labored up each hill, foot to the floor at 45 mph on some hills, getting 9 mpg, towing the exact same load. The V10 Crew cab cruises up the same hills with the cruise control set at about 58mph and gets about 8 mpg. Mind you, this is hwy 101 on the Oregon coast and it's one steep hill after another, plus tight turns and lots of slow traffic. The V10 has so far proven to be exactly what I want and more. I know we all need to make our own choice as far as trucks, but if I had gotten the 5.4 I would have been in the same boat as the Suburban, both power and mileage-wise. Was it worth an extra $30 in gas? Without question.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 10:44 AM
  #21  
jac08f250's Avatar
jac08f250
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 696
Likes: 1
From: Melissa TX
I have a 08 f-250 CC 4X4 with the 5.4 and I avg 15-17 mpg depends on the traffic here in the dfw area. And I have towed 9500lbs with 1000lbs in the bed. I avg about 9 mpg going about 120 miles. The best mpg I have avg was 18 once driving out to west TX going on I-20.
Now about the V-10, if it was such a great motor how come they wont offer it in the new super duty unless you get the cab and chassis option only. Just sayin.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #22  
Sand_Man's Avatar
Sand_Man
Posting Guru
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 4
From: Rogue River, Oregon
The 5.4 is a great motor indeed. But out here on the west coast we have hills and turns and hills with turns and you simply cannot maintain momentum like you can on flat straight roads elsewhere. I remember renting a PT Cruiser in Florida a few years back and marveling at how stout the car felt. The thing stayed in overdrive at 70mph on the entire drive from Orlando to Ocala ( about a 1hr, 45 min drive) something that no other car I'd driven at home would do. Then my 7 year old son pointed out how flat the state was, somthing I had never noticed. Drive your 5.4 crew cab out here and see if it's "good enough" after a long pull...
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #23  
Rush117's Avatar
Rush117
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Humble, Texas
Originally Posted by jac08f250
Now about the V-10, if it was such a great motor how come they wont offer it in the new super duty unless you get the cab and chassis option only. Just sayin.
I don't think you can judge a motor based on whether they are going to continue to offer it. There could be a myriad of reasons for Ford to toss it. As of late, the V10 competes very well with the psd and maybe they just don't want that kind of overlap in their stable. It could also be that the cost of producing them is rising and they don't want to add to the option cost. It could also be that Ford is putting their gas eggs in the 6.2 basket.

We don't have enough info to accurately guesstimate why. My guess is that dependability or performance were not considerations.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #24  
r_outsider's Avatar
r_outsider
New User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I think that either motor will probably work just fine and you should just pay attention to getting the truck in the best overall condition for your money that you can find. The 5.4 will be down on power compared to a V10, if you're not trying to win the Stoplight Nationals or Pike's Peak with your camper on, it probably won't bother you. The V10 probably uses a little more fuel, but given the weight and aerodynamic penalty of these trucks, it's really not that much of a difference. You can find people on this site with either engine getting 7mpg or 18mpg. Driving styles and traffic patterns probably play the biggest role in getting good or bad mileage.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #25  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21,437
Likes: 76
From: Gilbert, PA
Originally Posted by jac08f250
I have a 08 f-250 CC 4X4 with the 5.4 and I avg
Now about the V-10, if it was such a great motor how come they wont offer it in the new super duty unless you get the cab and chassis option only. Just sayin.
If you are going to use that mentality , that must be why you cannot get a stick shift any more either(because they are no good?) NO it is because ford does not sell enough of them, due to people thinking like you

Now to the OP. You can get by w the 5.4. But You could of gotten by in the 80s-90s w a 300 6cyl in a f350 but Why?! If is like getting a 351 in the 97 and older trucks. If you are buying a big truck get a big engine, it only makes sense. And as stated earlier, the 6.8(v10) is only a 600 option. On top of that when you hit the gas, the truck goes. Not drop 2 gears and scream , like the 5.4 will do.

I would not even give a 5.4 SD a second look if i was shopping for one.

JMHO
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #26  
ken kenmnedy's Avatar
ken kenmnedy
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 1
From: muskegon mi.
I am just sayin look for the truck with the options you want and dont worry if its a 8 or 10 you will be satisfied with either one.......they stoped the v10 in thef250 f350 superduty in 2011 so the mexican oil burner wouldnt have the comp-a-ticion..........(both of the new motors will be made in mexi)
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #27  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Tawn
When I had the 2008 F-250 Crew Cab (4 full sized doors & 6' bed), 5.4L with 3.73 gears I observed:

13.6-13.9 MPG: Flat, level ground with cruise control set at 60-65 MPH with the truck empty other than me.

12.3-12.6 MPG: City driving, without getting on it at green lights or changing lanes.

9.0-10.- MPG: Pulling a 21' Center Console Boat (~5000lbs). The boat has a T-Top on it so in addition to the weight I am also pulling a large parachute.
That exactly what I get with my '05 CC 8' bed V10 with a 4.10 axle. I do average 8-9mpg with the 9950lb GVWR travel trailer behind it instead of 9-10 though.

JL
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 08:47 AM
  #28  
Saz221's Avatar
Saz221
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Ill say this- Redford is giving you some really good advice. It is going to come down to a personal preference. If you are one of those guys that need to pull uphill at 70mph, get the V-10. Im not knocking the V-10 by any means. It is a great motor, and I'm kinda sad that it wont be available in the 250 and 350's past the 2010 model year.
I run an 08 f-250 4X4, 5.4, 6 spd manual with 4.10's, and NO electronic 4 wheel drive actuator so I can free spin my front- I like my stub on the floor. I pull a 32' travel trailer pretty often and the heaviest trip we did it was weighing in at a shade over 10,000lbs, but it is usually somewhere around 9000. I live in alaska so the driving varies quite a bit, but there is always a lot of driving in the mountains. Any time I am pulling my camper I will get somewhere between 8.5 and 11mpg. I saw you were asking about the wind drag so i included a picture of my rig. YES, it drags in the wind a lot so I wouldnt worry too much about your camper. All in all I love my set up, and I think that the 5.4 is a great motor and you just can't kill it!


 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #29  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by Saz221
I think that the 5.4 is a great motor and you just can't kill it!


I agree with that completely. The 5.4L does not get the respect it deserves. Same as the 4.6L in the F150.
JL
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #30  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Part of the problem with gassers in SDs and even the F-150s is most of them came geared wrong from the factory. Ford should have never offered 3.73 gears in a gasser. 4.10 standard with 4.30 and 4.56 gears as options.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE