General Diesel Discussion  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FORD to TAKE CUMMINS CONTRACT. from a reliable source

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-25-2009, 06:51 PM
PHElectric's Avatar
PHElectric
PHElectric is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is actuall a cool little engine is the 3.0 v6 that mercedes put in the sprinter vans, almost get 22 on HWY. only 155 horses but 280 toruque, and no head gaskets to blow. I actually drove it after, well still owning a chevy express and HOLY *****, that german engine is way ahead of anything else i've seen. looked really simple too.
 
  #32  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:37 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
powerstroke72 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 24,308
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by PHElectric
What is actuall a cool little engine is the 3.0 v6 that mercedes put in the sprinter vans, almost get 22 on HWY. only 155 horses but 280 toruque, and no head gaskets to blow. I actually drove it after, well still owning a chevy express and HOLY *****, that german engine is way ahead of anything else i've seen. looked really simple too.
You are right. Those are very good engines and are seeing a lot of use in ambulances here. The local ambulance service that runs 3 of them is getting right at 20 MPG with them and they are very pleased with the power and economy.
 
  #33  
Old 08-25-2009, 08:15 PM
Mustang6147's Avatar
Mustang6147
Mustang6147 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mercedes used to make a 5 cylinder inline diesel to, It was very powerful, and in a small package. They put those in everything from straight trucks, to there smaller single axle semi's.

The Germans are light years ahead with diesels
 
  #34  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:37 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Mustang6147
Mercedes used to make a 5 cylinder inline diesel to, It was very powerful, and in a small package. They put those in everything from straight trucks, to there smaller single axle semi's.

The Germans are light years ahead with diesels
American Diesel technology is just as advanced as German technology - if not more so. Ford had one of the first fully electronically injected diesels in the world - and was common rail as well - the 7.3 PSD. Volkswagen was still using an injection system up until 2006 that essentially dated from the very beginning of Diesel engines. VW was not able to sell diesels here for two years (07-08) because they couldn't meet our emissions standards.
 
  #35  
Old 08-26-2009, 02:36 AM
PHElectric's Avatar
PHElectric
PHElectric is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Head
American Diesel technology is just as advanced as German technology - if not more so. Ford had one of the first fully electronically injected diesels in the world - and was common rail as well - the 7.3 PSD. Volkswagen was still using an injection system up until 2006 that essentially dated from the very beginning of Diesel engines. VW was not able to sell diesels here for two years (07-08) because they couldn't meet our emissions standards.

My grandpa is from Germany. Its a fact that a VW is considered a hunk of crap by people from germany, they know its inferior and if it wasn't for U.S. love of the bug VW would be even worse off. Its looked at like a hyundai is looked at over here. I even had some russian guys who worked for me and they all said the same thing. "piece of crap".

So comparing the U.S. diesel technolgy to VW is pretty sad. Try to copare it to mercedes. you'll be laughed off the planet. I mean come on Isuzu is not a very quality company as far as diesels and they make the Duramax and that is topshelf along with international and cummins. We are way behind in diesel technology, and the EPA is just making it that much harder to advance.
 
  #36  
Old 08-26-2009, 04:43 AM
fonefiddy's Avatar
fonefiddy
fonefiddy is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 2,585
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by brian42
Depending on how the Scorpion does and the reality of a Cummins in a SD, maybe there is life after my 7.3L...
The only reality of a Cummins in Your SD, is if You do the swap Yourself.

These rumors are silly. They fly around every time Dodge gets into the headlines.

There's no way in hell Ford is going to abandon the Scorpion. Especially in these turbulent times.

And if You don't think Ford has dotted the i's and crossed the t's with the Scorpion, Your fooling Yourself. Ford will NOT stand for another debacle like the 6.0 was. If they feel the engine is not ready, it'll stay in R&D until it is.

Also, Cummins basically shot themselves in the foot by playing the little paper game with emissions numbers. They're paying for it now. Just go read some of the Dodge/Cummins forums. Not a lot of happy campers out there. The EPA is strangling the crap out of Diesels. I think the completely new Scorpion platform has a lot better chance of getting it right, than a platform that was basically designed 30 years ago.
 
  #37  
Old 08-26-2009, 04:54 AM
Skip1970's Avatar
Skip1970
Skip1970 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Semper Fi tell I die!
Posts: 15,014
Received 31 Likes on 22 Posts
lies lies lies! it will never happen.
 
  #38  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:21 AM
That_Guy's Avatar
That_Guy
That_Guy is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brinklow Md
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Head
American Diesel technology is just as advanced as German technology - if not more so. Ford had one of the first fully electronically injected diesels in the world - and was common rail as well - the 7.3 PSD.
The 7.3 was not a common rail...
 
  #39  
Old 08-26-2009, 10:08 AM
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by That_Guy
The 7.3 was not a common rail...

Oh yes it was. All HEUI engines are common rail.
 
  #40  
Old 08-26-2009, 02:38 PM
PHElectric's Avatar
PHElectric
PHElectric is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fonefiddy
The only reality of a Cummins in Your SD, is if You do the swap Yourself.

These rumors are silly. They fly around every time Dodge gets into the headlines.

There's no way in hell Ford is going to abandon the Scorpion. Especially in these turbulent times.

And if You don't think Ford has dotted the i's and crossed the t's with the Scorpion, Your fooling Yourself. Ford will NOT stand for another debacle like the 6.0 was. If they feel the engine is not ready, it'll stay in R&D until it is.

Also, Cummins basically shot themselves in the foot by playing the little paper game with emissions numbers. They're paying for it now. Just go read some of the Dodge/Cummins forums. Not a lot of happy campers out there. The EPA is strangling the crap out of Diesels. I think the completely new Scorpion platform has a lot better chance of getting it right, than a platform that was basically designed 30 years ago.

Everyone said our S&P 500 would never get this low not in a million years, the nasdaq dropped throgh the floor along with the dow jones farther past the point of everyone saying it will, Now there all standing there like idiots with their comments in their hats.

If I would of told you 2 years ago Chrysler and GM are going to be bankrupt, you would of laughed me off the scene. Fact is things change and blow peoples minds all the time. I would never say "never" in this world at these risky times. Its pretty closed minded. All the old rumors about this floated around back when the economy was fine. And now you have an expiring cummins contract coming up, and chrysler always had this taken care of a year in advance, NOW THATS NOT HAPPENING AND NEW CHRYLSER IS OWNED BY FIAT, WHO WILL PROBABLY BUILD THEIR OWN DIESEL.

AND AS FAR AS FORD NOT RELSEASING THAT SCORPION UNTIL ITS TIP TOP, LOL. LOOK AT MY JOB#1 6.4. ITS BEEN IN THE SHOP MORE THAN ON THE ROAD SERIOUSLY. SCORPION WILL FLOP LIKE AND THEY WILL PICKUP CUMMINS.
 
  #41  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:14 PM
brian42's Avatar
brian42
brian42 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,056
Received 118 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by origcharger
Oh yes it was. All HEUI engines are common rail.
The 7.3 is hydraulic (HPOP)/electronic instead of just straight electronic control like the newer ones and the "common" fuel lines deadhead into the head (along with all the air bubbles).
 
  #42  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:16 PM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Lubbockguy1979 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 2,757
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
The reason the over seas market is better at diesel is simple. The fuel costs. If we payed what they pay for gas there wouldn't be a gas vehicle market
 
  #43  
Old 08-26-2009, 04:52 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by PHElectric
My grandpa is from Germany. Its a fact that a VW is considered a hunk of crap by people from germany, they know its inferior and if it wasn't for U.S. love of the bug VW would be even worse off. Its looked at like a hyundai is looked at over here. I even had some russian guys who worked for me and they all said the same thing. "piece of crap".

So comparing the U.S. diesel technolgy to VW is pretty sad. Try to copare it to mercedes. you'll be laughed off the planet. I mean come on Isuzu is not a very quality company as far as diesels and they make the Duramax and that is topshelf along with international and cummins. We are way behind in diesel technology, and the EPA is just making it that much harder to advance.
Alright then, name some things that make Mercedes diesels so much better then American ones.
 
  #44  
Old 08-26-2009, 06:14 PM
That_Guy's Avatar
That_Guy
That_Guy is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brinklow Md
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by origcharger
Oh yes it was. All HEUI engines are common rail.
The 6.4 is the first motor ford had/has that fires the injectors electronically. The 7.3 and 6.0 use oil pressure to fire the injectors. I always thought a "common rail" motor fed all the cylinders from one single rail. and then the end of that rail was returned back to the tank. The HEUI 7.3 has a fuel rail on both sides of the motor and fuel pressure will even vary between the two, unless you connect them yourself. And then as Brian said below, the rail dead ends into the head with any air traped in the lines. Ford even put a different injector in there to deal with the rail dead ending there since its cheaper/easier to do then a common rail set up. There is only one 7.3 I know of running a common rail set up, and thats Double Overtime, the sled pulling truck.

Originally Posted by brian42
The 7.3 is hydraulic (HPOP)/electronic instead of just straight electronic control like the newer ones and the "common" fuel lines deadhead into the head (along with all the air bubbles).
Exactly Brian.
 
  #45  
Old 08-26-2009, 07:33 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by That_Guy
The 6.4 is the first motor ford had/has that fires the injectors electronically.
This is false. Every Power Stroke engine has electronically fired injectors. The computer commands a solenoid within each injector to allow high pressure oil to actuate a plunger/piston assembly to fire the fuel into the engine. If that is not electronically injected, then I do not know what is.

The 7.3 and 6.0 use oil pressure to fire the injectors. I always thought a "common rail" motor fed all the cylinders from one single rail. and then the end of that rail was returned back to the tank. The HEUI 7.3 has a fuel rail on both sides of the motor and fuel pressure will even vary between the two, unless you connect them yourself.
How do you suppose V8 Common rail diesels work? The 6.4 has two "common rails", one under each valve cover. Common rail simply means the injectors share a common fuel source - not individual injection lines from an an injection pump, and the 7.3-6.0 power strokes do exactly this.
And then as Brian said below, the rail dead ends into the head with any air traped in the lines. Ford even put a different injector in there to deal with the rail dead ending there since its cheaper/easier to do then a common rail set up. There is only one 7.3 I know of running a common rail set up, and thats Double Overtime, the sled pulling truck.
The single fuel rail on a Cummins dead ends into the #6 injector, which means that injector has to deal with most of the trapped air in the system. The 6.4 power stroke has two seperate fuel rails, one for each cylinder head, but they both feed off the same source on the high pressure fuel pump. Both those are labeled as Common Rail engines, and the 7.3/6.0 are no different in fuel distribution.
 


Quick Reply: FORD to TAKE CUMMINS CONTRACT. from a reliable source



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.