Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #16  
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 15
From: Central Ohio
I know how you feel, you'd think with the 'advances' our trucks would be pretty solid in the 20's by now (mpg i mean). Heck there were some chevy trucks in the 90's that were actually EPA rated in the low 20's (I think they were the 6.2 diesle maybe, i'd have to look it up). Its ashame that we cant even match the 90's currently. BUT... the trucks today are about 50% larger, heavier, more powerful, and pretty much all the ratings for payload and towing are way up. On top of that with the diesels they are really craking down on the emissions, I guess you could say its like back in the 70's with the gassers almost. As I recall there were a few model 460 big blocks rated all the way down under like 150 horse power due to the big emisions crunch back in the 70's... we should be thanksfull that at least the trucks today are at their peak capability wise. they just need to get out of the stupid power race and start working on economy a little more.
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #17  
Greg B's Avatar
Greg B
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 2
I don't have real numbers for 3 valve engines, but on 2 valve engines the V-10 gets better mileage not towing and empty than a 5.4L. I know several folks who have both and the V-10's with 2 valves seem to get arount 14 mpg (US) on the highway empty. The 5.4L guys tend to get 12.5 empty on the highway. All have E/C and 4X4 automatics and F250's. I do know a couple of guys with the 6.4L engine and they say they are getting 14.5-15 MPG highway empty.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 06:23 AM
  #18  
Laynlowf250's Avatar
Laynlowf250
Junior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Before I lifted my 05 f250 v10 crew cab 8' bed fully loaded=option wise (ref for weight size) I was getting about 13 mpg highway. Now I am getting 8mpg but that's mostly just around town driving haven't done any real highway miles since the lift.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 06:37 AM
  #19  
MikeMcCasland's Avatar
MikeMcCasland
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 365
Likes: 4
From: Round Rock, TX
Just yesterday I ran from Austin to San Antonio and back (200 mile round trip) in an unloaded V10 4x4 Crew Cab and got 13.7MPG. I was averaging about 70 mph the entire way.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #20  
cepterjockey82's Avatar
cepterjockey82
New User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
according to the handy dany mpg function on the dash i get around 15 on the highway empty and around 10 with 4k of trailor behind me thats with the 5.4 and 373's
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #21  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Originally Posted by cepterjockey82
according to the handy dany mpg function on the dash i get around 15 on the highway empty and around 10 with 4k of trailor behind me thats with the 5.4 and 373's
This is what would fall under wrong calculations that I mentioned in my reply to your post in the K&N thread. The computer cannot be trusted for accurate mpg calculations.

Compare it's calculations to your own, if you add a tuner to your vehicle, you can't trust your computer from then on out for mpg calculations. You have a small chance that the computer and your calculations are going to be close enough(or the same) with a stock truck, change the stock truck configuration, especially fueling tables and it's not going to be correct.

I should be getting 22mpg according to my truck's computer and I actually get anywhere from 13-16mpg.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #22  
cepterjockey82's Avatar
cepterjockey82
New User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
i completely understand that the computer cant be fully trusted never seen one that could i dont bother to check my mileage from fill up to fill up cause i dont really care as far as the whol;e filter deal i think what is trying to be uncovered is wether or not its worth it in the lond run to use the k&n
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #23  
kmprr's Avatar
kmprr
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Thanks again for all the info.

I might be better off going V10 as opposed to the 5.4 for my highway driving.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 11, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #24  
JEB70's Avatar
JEB70
Junior User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
2005 F250 XLT 4x4 5.4 V8 SuperCab Short Bed, 3.73 rear, 5 speed auto and I get 13.5 mpg mixed driving.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #25  
QwkTrip's Avatar
QwkTrip
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 2
Tex, don't be ****.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #26  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by tex25025
. The computer cannot be trusted for accurate mpg calculations.
if you add a tuner to your vehicle, you can't trust your computer from then on out for mpg calculations.
If the person working the software knows what they're doing,then it can be trusted to be accurate. My fuel economy meter is within .5 mpg on every fillup no matter the driving.
JL
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #27  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
If the person working the software knows what they're doing,then it can be trusted to be accurate. My fuel economy meter is within .5 mpg on every fillup no matter the driving.
JL

That's a pretty big if and one that I don't think the majority of the tuned population(atleast 51%) would be that lucky to have happen. The reason being is that I'm willing to bet that the majority of the tuned population doesn't have custom tuned vehicles. I see far more off-the-shelf tuner then I do ones for custom tunes. Unless the gas tuning world is all that much different then diesel, I would also be a little shaky as to how much they are actually able to get into that part of the computer. Even with PT DIAG I can only go so far within the computer and that program allows me to tune the ECM, TCM, and FICM of any Ford vehicle.


Originally Posted by QwkTrip
Tex, don't be ****.
Doing what I do as served me well for many years. Yes it has "annoyed" many people, but by being "****"(as you put it) and nit-picking, it has kept me from making decisions that would have cost me quite a bit. It's not a habit that I'm eager to break either because of that.

"You" wouldn't believe the flaws that you find in people's arguments if you were to start picking them apart and those flaws might actually be big enough to keep you from swaying over to that decision and what doing that entails.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #28  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by tex25025
That's a pretty big if and one that I don't think the majority of the tuned population(atleast 51%) would be that lucky to have happen. The reason being is that I'm willing to bet that the majority of the tuned population doesn't have custom tuned vehicles. I see far more off-the-shelf tuner then I do ones for custom tunes. Unless the gas tuning world is all that much different then diesel, I would also be a little shaky as to how much they are actually able to get into that part of the computer. Even with PT DIAG I can only go so far within the computer and that program allows me to tune the ECM, TCM, and FICM of any Ford vehicle.
The actual parameter to adjust the calculation for the fuel economy meter is known by reputable tuners,and is easily adjusted. So-are you using a Cardaq for your tuning?
JL
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 10:30 AM
  #29  
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,626
Likes: 7
From: Plano TX and Brentwood TN
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
So-are you using a Cardaq for your tuning?

Yes and no, the base software is based off of that, but it isn't specifically the cardaq.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #30  
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 12
From: SE Texas
Originally Posted by tex25025
Yes and no, the base software is based off of that, but it isn't specifically the cardaq.
Ok,then you're using the USB based MCS1?
JL
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE