Why so much bashing of the 09
#76
Now were talking remember when the F-150 was a 1/2 ton Daly driver ! and you didint need to tow anything but a uhaul trailer, for band gear, and home depot supplies, wait now were talking abut me.
#77
that is a very viable option...but one that will never happen.
Ford would be seen as backing down the F-150...and then Dodge, Nissan, Toyota, Chevy would step into that void of "The biggest baddest 1/2 ton"
I personally would like to see the size remain the same, but some gastric bypass occur. If these trucks could lose about 1,000 lbs or so...I think you'd see an easy 2-3 MPG gain...if not more.
Who really needs 10,000...or even 11,000 lbs of capacity in a 1/2 tons?
really? just buy the damn superduty that originated with that purpose in mind.
really? just buy the damn superduty that originated with that purpose in mind.
that being said, I believe Ford could easily back down the frame a few thousand pounds of capacity and have a lighter/trimmer truck that sits around 5,000 lbs in a Screw...yeah, it won't be useable for the 1/2 ton over-achiever guy who tows too much with too little truck...but it would be more than sufficient for 99% of the truck owners
And to compare a motor from 10 yrs ago to the newest revision that is roughy 70HP more powerful, 3v instead of 2v...I'm guessing that is what bsimmer was talking about.
not to mention, you are comparing a F-250 w/ diesel to a 1/2 ton gasser...duh, the Superduty does a better job hands down
My thinking exactly. I don't tow anything. I want a truck with the same space, but a more fuel efficient engine! They have high mpg diesel engines in the rest of the world, but not here, tho they were briefly selling some about thirty years ago (you still see some on the road). Gas prices will shoot up again, and then what?
that is the killer
So Ford can retool, and offer high mileage cars, but not a high mileage truck?
I've been saying it for a long time. If they build it, they will come.
Can You imagine the contractors alone that would buy in a heartbeat? If they can lower operating costs, the savings alone would convince them to buy new trucks. Add fleets from service dept's, DOT's , and then the average Joe.
I can't see how Ford can continue offering 6000 lb Limo type trucks and still maintain their #1 status. The first manufacturer that does offer a true 1/2 ton truck capable of 30 MPG will sell a TON of them.
I've been saying it for a long time. If they build it, they will come.
Can You imagine the contractors alone that would buy in a heartbeat? If they can lower operating costs, the savings alone would convince them to buy new trucks. Add fleets from service dept's, DOT's , and then the average Joe.
I can't see how Ford can continue offering 6000 lb Limo type trucks and still maintain their #1 status. The first manufacturer that does offer a true 1/2 ton truck capable of 30 MPG will sell a TON of them.
everybody considers MPG's a huge conspiracy...which is utter bull****.
Do you really think that every manufacturer out there is just pushing down the technology and keeping their current MPG's as they've been for the past 30 yrs (give or take a few years)?
Do you really think that every manufacturer out there is just pushing down the technology and keeping their current MPG's as they've been for the past 30 yrs (give or take a few years)?
The vehicles keep getting bigger and more powerful engines...weight + HP don't equate to good MPG's.
You can say my line of thinking is ludicrous...but I prefer to think it is reality...the physics don't support your conclusion at this sime
You can say my line of thinking is ludicrous...but I prefer to think it is reality...the physics don't support your conclusion at this sime
Ford has made many many innovations in the past 15 years. Most of them safety and creature comforts...but these come at a cost. WEIGHT
IMO, you can compare MPG dreams with that old saying "You can't have your cake and eat it too"
#79
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,163
Received 1,456 Likes
on
900 Posts
Uh Tylus
what a completely useless and utterly misinformed statement...that ranks up near the top of what I've seen here on FTE. I've towed with a 98 F-150 I owned. It was perfectly fine towing.
not to mention, you are comparing a F-250 w/ diesel to a 1/2 ton gasser...duh, the Superduty does a better job hands down
Tylus...Tylus
Let me add a little more info, although my comment is for a 98 F150 and not an 09, this truck barely could pull 5000lbs and was rated to pull 9k lbs. A friend had (past tense) a 2004 with the 3v thinking it would pull betting than mine and it was marginally better pulling about the same load and it to was gutless, therefore with my experience with the 5.4 engine I would never own another. Maybe the 5.0 and the 6.2 will solve this issue.
Bottom line is I was forced to upgrade trucks to a F250 because of a gutless 5.4 engine. The powerstroke does an exceptional job of pulling btw...
#81
Tylus...Tylus
Let me add a little more info, although my comment is for a 98 F150 and not an 09, this truck barely could pull 5000lbs and was rated to pull 9k lbs. A friend had (past tense) a 2004 with the 3v thinking it would pull betting than mine and it was marginally better pulling about the same load and it to was gutless, therefore with my experience with the 5.4 engine I would never own another. Maybe the 5.0 and the 6.2 will solve this issue.
Bottom line is I was forced to upgrade trucks to a F250 because of a gutless 5.4 engine. The powerstroke does an exceptional job of pulling btw...
Let me add a little more info, although my comment is for a 98 F150 and not an 09, this truck barely could pull 5000lbs and was rated to pull 9k lbs. A friend had (past tense) a 2004 with the 3v thinking it would pull betting than mine and it was marginally better pulling about the same load and it to was gutless, therefore with my experience with the 5.4 engine I would never own another. Maybe the 5.0 and the 6.2 will solve this issue.
Bottom line is I was forced to upgrade trucks to a F250 because of a gutless 5.4 engine. The powerstroke does an exceptional job of pulling btw...
You come in here and interject a random thought about the 5.4 engine....but wait, you aren't referring to the 09's...and your only experience of the 5.4 3v is with a friends truck, not your own.
again...you made an utterly worthless comment...and it is doubly so in the contex of this thread...this is exactly the sort of crap the OP was talking about
the 5.4 engine from 1997 is a wholly different engine from the 5.4 3v of today
the 5.4 engine from 1997 is a wholly different engine from the 5.4 3v of today
are you one of those people who likes to fly by at 75 mph with a overloaded truck and trailer...because you can?
sounds like it...it is usually the guys who have a need for speed while towing...they are the ones who have issues with the 5.4 engine.
5.4 won't win a race towing or not...but it will get the job done. rather handily actually
from my own personal experience, the 5.4 3v is more than adequate at towing pretty much any load you have within it's rated specs. Of course it will bog down on hills...surprise.
5.4 won't win a race towing or not...but it will get the job done. rather handily actually
#82
show me a gas V8 engine with stock gearing that won't bog down on a hill with a 5-8k load on it??? what some guys expect out of a gas v8 engine is diesel-like performance. just because the F150 is rated to tow X amount, doesn't mean it will do it as easy as the F250, F350...
gearing... i'll bet a lot of guys didn't even consider that when they bought the truck. it makes a huge difference!!!
gearing... i'll bet a lot of guys didn't even consider that when they bought the truck. it makes a huge difference!!!
#83
Let me add a little more info, although my comment is for a 98 F150 and not an 09, this truck barely could pull 5000lbs and was rated to pull 9k lbs. A friend had (past tense) a 2004 with the 3v thinking it would pull betting than mine and it was marginally better pulling about the same load and it to was gutless, therefore with my experience with the 5.4 engine I would never own another. Maybe the 5.0 and the 6.2 will solve this issue.
Krewat
If you want brand-new, go look at how the 6.0 Powerstroke did in the Superduty in 2003
What was wrong with the 6.0? Nothing at all. The problems just like with the current powerstroke are in the government mandated emissions controls that Ford has nothing to do with. At least that is what has been my experience, I have a buddie who is a tech at Ford and drives an F250 with the 6.0. Also my dad ordered a 03 F250 with the 6.0 and has yet to have any problems. Just curious if there were any other problems that I am not aware of.
#84
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,163
Received 1,456 Likes
on
900 Posts
what were you towing with your "gutless" 98 with 5.4?
You come in here and interject a random thought about the 5.4 engine....but wait, you aren't referring to the 09's...and your only experience of the 5.4 3v is with a friends truck, not your own.
You come in here and interject a random thought about the 5.4 engine....but wait, you aren't referring to the 09's...and your only experience of the 5.4 3v is with a friends truck, not your own.
again...you made an utterly worthless comment...and it is doubly so in the contex of this thread...this is exactly the sort of crap the OP was talking about
the 5.4 engine from 1997 is a wholly different engine from the 5.4 3v of today
are you one of those people who likes to fly by at 75 mph with a overloaded truck and trailer...because you can?the 5.4 engine from 1997 is a wholly different engine from the 5.4 3v of today
sounds like it...it is usually the guys who have a need for speed while towing...they are the ones who have issues with the 5.4 engine.
5.4 won't win a race towing or not...but it will get the job done. rather handily actually
from my own personal experience, the 5.4 3v is more than adequate at towing pretty much any load you have within it's rated specs. Of course it will bog down on hills...surprise.5.4 won't win a race towing or not...but it will get the job done. rather handily actually
The interjected random thought was my actual experience with both the 5.4 2v and 3v engines in which I'm not impressed with either.
Didn't drive a overloaded truck or trailer. The weight was well within the trucks tow rating and I drive the speed limit of 70mph. Not asking too much here for a truck.
Didn't tow my boat to the race track... Actually I towed it to the boat ramp and the 5.4 engine struggled to do just that.
Glad your satified with your truck as I've been a blue oval fan for many years.
My experience with the 5.4 2V and to a lesser degree 3V is very disapointing. Fuel mileage towing the boat was 8 -9 mpg, because the engine couldn't keep the trany in overdrive. It basically ran in 3rd gear. The 5.4 engine was actually quite reliable it just falls short in the power. Also the truck was a 4x4 super cab with 17" tires.
Tylus... Ever driven a Super Duty 4x4 Crew Cab with a 5.4? Well that's really a Utterly and Worthless setup!
#85
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,163
Received 1,456 Likes
on
900 Posts
show me a gas V8 engine with stock gearing that won't bog down on a hill with a 5-8k load on it??? what some guys expect out of a gas v8 engine is diesel-like performance. just because the F150 is rated to tow X amount, doesn't mean it will do it as easy as the F250, F350...
gearing... i'll bet a lot of guys didn't even consider that when they bought the truck. it makes a huge difference!!!
gearing... i'll bet a lot of guys didn't even consider that when they bought the truck. it makes a huge difference!!!
#87
one of my company work trucks is an 04 f250 crew cab, automatic, 3.73 geared 5.4 and it is by far the most underpowered v8 truck i have ever driven. just stick your hand out the window and it has to shift out of overdrive.
#88
What was wrong with the 6.0? Nothing at all. The problems just like with the current powerstroke are in the government mandated emissions controls that Ford has nothing to do with. At least that is what has been my experience, I have a buddie who is a tech at Ford and drives an F250 with the 6.0. Also my dad ordered a 03 F250 with the 6.0 and has yet to have any problems. Just curious if there were any other problems that I am not aware of.
I towed 7,000 lbs with my '01 on a quite a regular basis with "no problem" as stated above. I towed in 3rd gear @ about 2500 rpm, and that's where it stayed except on very rare occasions it might dip down to 2nd. Better yet, I towed about 8,000 lbs on a few occasions with pretty similar results. It would slow a little more on some of the hills, but still passing those big rigs. I haven't done much towing with my '09 yet, but with the extra power and 2 extra gears it has over the '01, I can only see it doing even better.
Some guys think that if your truck can't tow up a mountain in overdrive, then it's a dog. Some guys think that if you lose any speed whatsoever up that mountain, it's a dog. I've had a diesel, and with a 7k load it could do that (stay in overdrive). However, some of the loads guys pull with their diesel will make it behave just like my 5.4 with 7 or 8k did. Been there, done that. It's all relative.
#89
I guess these arguments confuse me a bit.
If your concerned about towing capacity for the truck, wouldn't you buy the HD or the 250? In that case, why would you gripe about an engine which doesn't meet your needs?
If your concerned about fuel mileage (like me), wouldn't you buy the SFE vs a 5.4 (and larger) engine? In my screw sfe I got 26 mpg driving to work the other day...and thats a fact. I am averaging 19.4 or so between highway and city.
If you wanted the lighter truck, wouldn't you buy the single cab...etc etc etc.
I guess the point I am making is that NO ONE TRUCK OR VERSION THEREOF WILL MEET EVERYONES NEEDS.
Doesn't exist, and never will. Thats why Ford makes OPTIONS.
If your concerned about towing capacity for the truck, wouldn't you buy the HD or the 250? In that case, why would you gripe about an engine which doesn't meet your needs?
If your concerned about fuel mileage (like me), wouldn't you buy the SFE vs a 5.4 (and larger) engine? In my screw sfe I got 26 mpg driving to work the other day...and thats a fact. I am averaging 19.4 or so between highway and city.
If you wanted the lighter truck, wouldn't you buy the single cab...etc etc etc.
I guess the point I am making is that NO ONE TRUCK OR VERSION THEREOF WILL MEET EVERYONES NEEDS.
Doesn't exist, and never will. Thats why Ford makes OPTIONS.
#90
I guess these arguments confuse me a bit.
If your concerned about towing capacity for the truck, wouldn't you buy the HD or the 250? In that case, why would you gripe about an engine which doesn't meet your needs?
If your concerned about fuel mileage (like me), wouldn't you buy the SFE vs a 5.4 (and larger) engine? In my screw sfe I got 26 mpg driving to work the other day...and thats a fact. I am averaging 19.4 or so between highway and city.
If you wanted the lighter truck, wouldn't you buy the single cab...etc etc etc.
I guess the point I am making is that NO ONE TRUCK OR VERSION THEREOF WILL MEET EVERYONES NEEDS.
Doesn't exist, and never will. Thats why Ford makes OPTIONS.
If your concerned about towing capacity for the truck, wouldn't you buy the HD or the 250? In that case, why would you gripe about an engine which doesn't meet your needs?
If your concerned about fuel mileage (like me), wouldn't you buy the SFE vs a 5.4 (and larger) engine? In my screw sfe I got 26 mpg driving to work the other day...and thats a fact. I am averaging 19.4 or so between highway and city.
If you wanted the lighter truck, wouldn't you buy the single cab...etc etc etc.
I guess the point I am making is that NO ONE TRUCK OR VERSION THEREOF WILL MEET EVERYONES NEEDS.
Doesn't exist, and never will. Thats why Ford makes OPTIONS.
VERY well said, sir.