Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Is Ford still leasing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #16  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
I guess they would sting you if you done 20+k miles a year as well.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #17  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Mileage never really bothered me because if you do a 20k/yr lease your residual just goes down and your payment goes up. You are only prepaying for the extra depreciation from the extra miles. You have to figure if you buy the vehicle and put 60k miles on in 3 years, your resale value is that much lower than if you bought and put on 36k miles in 3 years. You are correct with the fact that the current lease scenerio doesn't make financial sense. I was only trying to point out that when leases were beneficial to the consumer, they were not bad. Fact of the matter is the leases of today have swayed from protecting the consumer to protecting the manufacturer. All i know is when my lease is up, i may have to seriously force myself to keep my vehicle for as long as possible.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #18  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
Car Financing: Buying vs Leasing

Simply put, car leasing is more expensive in the long run. The three scenarios are compared in more detail in Your Car's Total Cost of Ownership. However, here is an easy way to look at it.
Compare the Costs: Buying vs. Leasing vs. Buying a Used Car

Conclusions

Now we see that leasing becomes the most expensive way to drive — in the long run. Here's how leasing compares to the two ownership scenarios:

Leasing vs. Buying New — Using the figures presented in this article, it is $6,752 more to lease a new car over a five-year period, than it is to buy the same car outright. This breaks down to $1,350 more per year to lease rather than to buy a new car.
Leases always favor the automaker except in cases where the market value of the vehicle makes a dramatic, unexpected change the automaker did not anticipate. Again, trying to time the market is impossible unless you have a crystal ball. Leases have been the subject of huge abuses by automakers over the years. Anyone besides me remember the Ford Red Carpet problems? With a lease you are continuously paying for the most expensive years of car ownership: the first 3. It never goes away because you will always have a payment to make until you get off the lease train. With purchasing, after 3 years you're gaining the upper hand. The only advantage a lease offers is the prestige of owning a new car all the time. For some folks that's a priority, I'll take earlier retirement over that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #19  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
With purchasing, after 3 years you're gaining the upper hand. The only advantage a lease offers is the prestige of owning a new car all the time. For some folks that's a priority, I'll take earlier retirement over that.

This is why im keeping my truck until it's run into the ground. Ok i may buy another car/truck but im getting my moneys worth from it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #20  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
Car Financing: Buying vs Leasing



Compare the Costs: Buying vs. Leasing vs. Buying a Used Car



Leases always favor the automaker except in cases where the market value of the vehicle makes a dramatic, unexpected change the automaker did not anticipate. Again, trying to time the market is impossible unless you have a crystal ball. Leases have been the subject of huge abuses by automakers over the years. Anyone besides me remember the Ford Red Carpet problems? With a lease you are continuously paying for the most expensive years of car ownership: the first 3. It never goes away because you will always have a payment to make until you get off the lease train. With purchasing, after 3 years you're gaining the upper hand. The only advantage a lease offers is the prestige of owning a new car all the time. For some folks that's a priority, I'll take earlier retirement over that.
I would like to see them do this comparison with my last 3 leased vehicles. I don't know where they come up with higher insurance rates as my truck is $67/ month for full coverage through state farm and my agent has told me there is absolutely no difference in rate from buy to lease. Their example is a **** poor lease which i for one would never do. 350/month for a 20k car, with 3k down, whatever. Lets see this comparison for my msrp 37k truck where i put no money down except first payment at 310/month including salestax. I notice on their comparison that they didn't include taxes on either the purchase or buy. I said it before and i will say it again, if you know what to look for in a lease, they can be very beneficial. Basically i am gonna pay $12090 including my sales tax over a 39 month period. Right in line with normal depreciation. As we all know the last year our trucks are depreciating much faster than normal an all i can say is thank God i leased mine.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #21  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
Originally Posted by heathk2003
I would like to see them do this comparison with my last 3 leased vehicles. I don't know where they come up with higher insurance rates as my truck is $67/ month for full coverage through state farm and my agent has told me there is absolutely no difference in rate from buy to lease.
I pay $925/year for full coverage on a 2006 Roush F150, which includes specialty vehicle coverage, and that includes coverage on 3 other vehicles (wife's minivan, daughter's truck and a tow vehicle). I don't know about the monthly rate because I don't finance anything I can afford outright, but that amount divided by 12 is $77.08. My rates or yours proves nothing. Even the article said that it could vary depending on driving record, vehicle, age, etc.

[quote]Their example is a **** poor lease which i for one would never do. 350/month for a 20k car, with 3k down, whatever. Lets see this comparison for my msrp 37k truck where i put no money down except first payment at 310/month including salestax.[./quote]

Quote all the deals you want. Lease deals are only important to those who think payment amount is the determining factor. For me its overall cost of ownership of all vehicles costs combined over a life-time. According to many studies that can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Basically, are you an ant, or a grasshopper?

I notice on their comparison that they didn't include taxes on either the purchase or buy. I said it before and i will say it again, if you know what to look for in a lease, they can be very beneficial. Basically i am gonna pay $12090 including my sales tax over a 39 month period. Right in line with normal depreciation.
There you go... proving my point by talking about "normal" depreciation. You have normal depreciation those 36 months, and the next 36 and the next 36.... The person buying is through with rapid depreciation after a fixed time, and for a period of years has no payment.

You can boast about the great leasing deals you get. That's fine, you're getting great deals. But you're also saddling yourself with a payment forever which is doing the most damage a person can do to retirement prospects next to carrying a balance on credit cards.

As we all know the last year our trucks are depreciating much faster than normal an all i can say is thank God i leased mine.
You repeatedly ignore the fact that you cannot time markets. Your boasting about the depreciation rate today is like someone making a lucky call at the craps table. Markets go up, they go down. One can argue the benefits of leasing verses purchasing. A lease only wins short term - long term leasing is not a winning choice. Same with new... verses a 2-3 year old vehicle: unless you are prepared to take advantage of rare circumstances buying "slightly used" will put you ahead of buying new.

Run Your Car Into the Ground

Leasing a Car Foolishly

http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-bud...Money-Dilemmas
"The bottom line: Over the long term, buying costs you less."

The real reason you're broke - MSN Money
"Own your cars longer. This one move can save you literally hundreds of thousands of dollars over your lifetime. Keep your cars for at least a year or two, if not longer, after you've paid them off."
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:54 AM
  #22  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
I pay $925/year for full coverage on a 2006 Roush F150, which includes specialty vehicle coverage, plus coverage on 3 other vehicles (wife's minivan, daughter's truck and a tow vehicle). I don't know about the monthly rate because I don't finance anything I can afford outright, but that amount divided by 12 is $77.08. And you know what.... my rates or yours proves nothing. Even the article said that it could vary depending on driving record, vehicle, age, etc.



There you go... proving my point. "Normal" depreciation. Which is exactly what the article is talking about. You have normal depreciation those 36 months, and the next 36 and the next 36.... The person buying is through with rapid depreciation after a fixed time, and for a period of years has no payment.

You can boast till you're blue in the face about the great leasing deals you get. That's fine, you're getting great deals. But the fact remains thats a consumer saddling with a payment forever you are doing the most damage a person can do to retirement prospects (and I see that's one issue you've failed to address).



You repeatedly ignore the fact that you cannot time markets. Your boasting about the depreciation rate today is like someone making a lucky call at the craps table. Markets go up, they go down. One can argue the benefits of leasing verses purchasing. A lease only wins short term - long term leasing is not a winning choice.


Run Your Car Into the Ground

Leasing a Car Foolishly

http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-bud...Money-Dilemmas
"The bottom line: Over the long term, buying costs you less."

The real reason you're broke - MSN Money
"Own your cars longer. This one move can save you literally hundreds of thousands of dollars over your lifetime. Keep your cars for at least a year or two, if not longer, after you've paid them off."

Can you give any credible sources which show continously leasing a car is better for personal finances over the course of a life-time?

I understand why my mate got so stung on his lease now. You basicly have to return the car as it was when you bought it or major fee's. When his 3 year lease was up seats had cigerette burns in them and so did the head liner. He had bumped another car and had a few scuff marks on the near side rear quater and it had something in the trunk that had stained the carpet. He got cought with massive fees because of silly little things that happen when you own a car he still aint paid them and is going to court soon about it lol.

So is leaseing a good idea for a truck? Not if you are going to use it for work and def not if you want to do any upgrades to it. It would be like borrowing a friends car everday and worry about your gonna brake it or do to many miles in it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 08:11 AM
  #23  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
If you talk to any competent CPA they'll say the same thing: long term leasing doesn't make sense. The only time I've ever had my CPA recommend a lease is with a business vehicle because of the tax advantages, but that's going away as well since many trucks can be written off almost immediately.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #24  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,024
Likes: 1,519
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
If you talk to any competent CPA they'll say the same thing: long term leasing doesn't make sense. The only time I've ever had my CPA recommend a lease is with a business vehicle because of the tax advantages, but that's going away as well since many trucks can be written off almost immediately.
The only time I witnessed a lease truely benefiting a person was in the 1995. My buddy had an Izuzu Trooper. It was too small and he was buried deep in negetive eqiuity. He wanted a Windstar. With my negotiating assistance, he was able to lease a Windstar for the same monthly payment as the Trooper and shave a year off the financing terms and be rid of the undersized SUV. After the three year term was satisfied, he turned the van back in and walked away with a conventionally financed vehicle without rolling negative equity in the equation. He's never leased since.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #25  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 18
From: Enjoying the real world.
Tim,

That situation makes sense.... since it was used to leverage a situation and then termination the "lease train" once the situation changed.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #26  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
I like how he used the lease to get out of his negative equity situation and then proceeded to start the cycle all over again. I agree a lease for a work truck is not smart. For the guy like me that would normally trade his vehicle in every 3years anyway i see no disadvantage. If i kept my vehicles a long time then sure a purchase is definetely the way to go. For the guy that is pissed because he is getting charged for cigarette burns and excessive damage to returned leased vehicle, what the hell do you think would happen if you bought that car and traded it in? Do you seriously think you would get full market value? As far as damage goes, as long as you use a manufacturers program, they are very forgiving. When i got out of my dakota lease, i had a cracked windshield and a creased bumperand was already nearing my mileage allowance. Market conditions were good and it was beneficial for me to trade out of it to break even ( i was 1 year before my lease was up) to get my ram. And for the notion that i am only doing my lease solely for payment is ridiculous. I like a new car/truck every couple years and this is the best way for ME to do that with the least amount of money out of my pocket. I don't see the crime in that. I must say i really like this forum, it is fun having some spirited debates on here. I think at the end of the day we can agree that everyone has different needs and we each have to do what is best for are own needs. I don't abuse my vehicles, i don't keep em a long time, i don't drive massive amounts of miles per year and i know the leasing system very well and have learned to use it to my advantage. I don't want anyone to think i think leases are best for everyone but i just want to point out for SOME it is the cheapest way to enjoy driving a newer vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #27  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,024
Likes: 1,519
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by heathk2003
I like how he used the lease to get out of his negative equity situation and then proceeded to start the cycle all over again. I agree a lease for a work truck is not smart. For the guy like me that would normally trade his vehicle in every 3years anyway i see no disadvantage. If i kept my vehicles a long time then sure a purchase is definetely the way to go. For the guy that is pissed because he is getting charged for cigarette burns and excessive damage to returned leased vehicle, what the hell do you think would happen if you bought that car and traded it in? Do you seriously think you would get full market value? As far as damage goes, as long as you use a manufacturers program, they are very forgiving. When i got out of my dakota lease, i had a cracked windshield and a creased bumperand was already nearing my mileage allowance. Market conditions were good and it was beneficial for me to trade out of it to break even ( i was 1 year before my lease was up) to get my ram. And for the notion that i am only doing my lease solely for payment is ridiculous. I like a new car/truck every couple years and this is the best way for ME to do that with the least amount of money out of my pocket. I don't see the crime in that. I must say i really like this forum, it is fun having some spirited debates on here. I think at the end of the day we can agree that everyone has different needs and we each have to do what is best for are own needs. I don't abuse my vehicles, i don't keep em a long time, i don't drive massive amounts of miles per year and i know the leasing system very well and have learned to use it to my advantage. I don't want anyone to think i think leases are best for everyone but i just want to point out for SOME it is the cheapest way to enjoy driving a newer vehicle.
Don't be offended my friend. There is a financing solution for everyone. We have all illustrated, mainly Ken, that there are advantages and disadvantages to leasing.

Tim
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #28  
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Agreed 100%
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #29  
irishguy824's Avatar
irishguy824
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Ohio
Leases are bad for:

-People who use their vehicles for any type of work. Be it your job, or you're leasing your truck because you'll be doing a lot of work on your house the next three years, or because you want to be able to tow a boat or camper.

Scratches, dents, holes, stains...any type of damage gets you fees at the end of the lease deal.

-People who do a lot of driving. Leases have set amounts of miles on them, go over the miles and you pay guess what, more fees! My pastor rented a minivan in the late 1990's and her job requires a ton of driving. Her and her husband ended up paying tons of money in fees due to scratches, stains, holes in seats, and going over mileage. They have not leased a vehicle since.

That is why I wouldn't lease a vehicle and why my friend wouldn't lease from the dealership he works at.

When you own a vehicle there is no limit to the miles you can drive without financial penalty...no fees for scratches, dings, stains, or holes on top of what you had to pay down and in monthly payments.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #30  
Bsimmer3000's Avatar
Bsimmer3000
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by irishguy824
Leases are bad for:

-People who use their vehicles for any type of work. Be it your job, or you're leasing your truck because you'll be doing a lot of work on your house the next three years, or because you want to be able to tow a boat or camper.

Scratches, dents, holes, stains...any type of damage gets you fees at the end of the lease deal.

-People who do a lot of driving. Leases have set amounts of miles on them, go over the miles and you pay guess what, more fees! My pastor rented a minivan in the late 1990's and her job requires a ton of driving. Her and her husband ended up paying tons of money in fees due to scratches, stains, holes in seats, and going over mileage. They have not leased a vehicle since.

That is why I wouldn't lease a vehicle and why my friend wouldn't lease from the dealership he works at.

When you own a vehicle there is no limit to the miles you can drive without financial penalty...no fees for scratches, dings, stains, or holes on top of what you had to pay down and in monthly payments.
Yeah there are far to many bad reasons to lease over buying. The problem is no matter how hard you try you will always get dings, knocks, dirt, stains, tears, and scraps in trucks. If you ain't then you really don't need a truck. I could prob keep a car in fairly good condition but even then my wifes 3 year old Mazda has got damaged dash board, a couple of dings in doors from people in parking lots, a ding in the back from a rouge shopping cart, chipped paint on the front of the car and stained carpets. Most of this can be fixed but the dealer will sting you for that when you return your car. We have nothing to worry about as it's our car. Plus we have done way over the 15000 normal limit for annual millage. we have done 25000 a year. wouldn't like to see the fees on that. But im sure that if you could be very careful and not do to many miles then leaseing is fine.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mingya
Car/truck Buying Advice
0
Dec 11, 2016 12:38 AM
Bato367
2015 - 2020 F150
13
Mar 4, 2016 07:59 AM
RoyalFord
Car/truck Buying Advice
1
Mar 30, 2011 10:49 PM
soundwave
2009 - 2014 F150
3
Dec 9, 2009 11:23 AM
bbag88
Car/truck Buying Advice
3
Jan 4, 2005 02:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE