Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

How many rpm's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #16  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,524
Likes: 2,829
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by ri_truck_guy
.......
.....Are we sure the calculators are right?
The calculators under 'Articles-Specs', sub 'Automotive Calculators', match the results from the Novak calculator I posted above. It's a known forumula, and the calculator applies the variables. Math being what it is, not much room for error.

Your 2500 at 70 is not far off--for 1:1 third gear. After 3 shifts, you should be in fourth at .67. Something is wrong in your example, but it is not the formula or calculators. It seems a mystery, given your checks of the components. How again did you certify the speedo? Was there a gear change?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #17  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,524
Likes: 2,829
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Holmesuser01
Mines an 8.8" standard rear end. I had a chance to switch out rear ends a few years ago, but was mis-guided by someone with his "fact" that the 6 cylinder rear ends were built weaker than the V8's... It was a 300 six with the top shifter overdrive. Now, its gone. It was ordered by the original owner to be thrifty with gas. It averaged 20mpg for me.

Id check the door sticker but it is long gone.

The tag on the rear end cant be found either. This old truck sat for awhile before I got it.
So, to summerize what your situation is:

Your truck is a 300 six (?)
You have a C 6.
You run 235-75s which are 29 inches in diameter.
You turn 3000 rpm at 70 mph.

As per previous post and the calculator, you are running approx 3.7 gears, probably 3.73s in an 8.8. (the one with the cover on the back, right?)

You can swap to anything around 2.79-3.0 or even 3.08 and make enough of a difference to be worthwhile. You will lose some off-line performance, but the six developes the torque low enough that you'll still be acceptable.

The other alternative is an AOD trans from a V8 car or truck or 6 truck from '88 to '93.

Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #18  
ri_truck_guy's Avatar
ri_truck_guy
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 3
From: Suffolk, VA USA
Club FTE Gold Member
The speedometer gear was updated when I changed the tire size. It's been verified using GPS and police radar at several speeds. It's dead on. I'll put a different tach in tomorrow or Thursday...I've done enough cluster swaps at this point that its a ten minute drill. Like I said earlier, thinking about it, the truck doesn't seem like it's running at 2500. It just runs so well that I never gave it a second thought. It certainly isn't straining at 70. It will run much faster then that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #19  
86F150302's Avatar
86F150302
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville FL
I have a 302,AOD,3.55s, and 255-60-15s and I run 2300 at 70.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #20  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,524
Likes: 2,829
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 86F150302
I have a 302,AOD,3.55s, and 255-60-15s and I run 2300 at 70.
Tires should be 27", and if so:

Calculator shows 3092 at 70 in 1:1 third,
2072 rpm in .67 fourth.

Don't know why your numbers are so far off. 3.91s get you 2282 rpms at 70 with all the rest.....

Beats me......
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 01:30 AM
  #21  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
Originally Posted by ri_truck_guy
The tach matched the rpm readout on an engine analyzer hooked up to it a few months back....I made a point of looking at the time because I wanted to make sure about the tach. That's not to say it still can't be wrong, but it did match the figures on a fairly high end machine. Thinking about it, 2500 does sound pretty high, but the truck runs so well that I really didn't give it another thought. This is my 8th truck from this generation and the best runner of them all. I've got another tach I can put in just to make sure. There's no question I was in OD at the time...I started from dead start and can count to four. I was in the rear differential just yesterday changing out the lube. I didn't count teeth, but can tell it's tagged as a 3.55 and certainly looked to be in the mid-threes. The truck runs great and gets about 15+ mpg average.

Are we sure the calculators are right?
I'm sure that mine is a 4R70W with overdrive and 3.55 and it turns barely over 2,000 RPM at 70 MPH with 255 70 15 tires.

Are you sure that your gears havent been changed to maybe something like 4.10s?

I had 32 inch tires on my truck for a while and it would get about 12 mpg and turned less than 2,000 rpm at 70.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 01:32 AM
  #22  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
Originally Posted by 86F150302
I have a 302,AOD,3.55s, and 255-60-15s and I run 2300 at 70.
This sounds about right.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 01:34 AM
  #23  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
This is interesting though. I used to have a sunpro tach and it read about 1900 at 70. The Lightning instrument cluster I have reads about 2100 at 70. Why does the aftermarket tach read lower or whe OEM tach read higher? I don't know which is the case.

A friend of mine has a nearly identicle truck with a factory tach cluster and his runs about 2100 at 70 as well.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 01:56 AM
  #24  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
Is it possible the the older AOD doesn't have a TC lock up? The larger tires should lower the RPMs.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #25  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,524
Likes: 2,829
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
This sounds about right.
It might sound right, but it doesn't compute out.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #26  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
I don't know how it doesn't compute out. I have 255 70 15 tires and it turns just over 2000 about 2100 at 70.

What calculator are you using?

http://www.1010tires.com/tiresizecalculator.asp

235 75 15 is 28.87 tall
255 60 15 is 27.04 tall
255 70 15 is 29.05 tall
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #27  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
If you look at this chart you'll see that 3.55 with a 29 inch tire is around 2674 rpm at 65 mph. This is with a 1:1 ratio not counting overdrive. If you factor in overdrive it would drop to just under 2000 wouldn't it? So at 5 mph faster its up a couple hundred rpm just over 2000. Still its close to what it should be.

With a 27 inch tire and 3.55 in 3rd it would be 2872 rpm at 65 without overdrive factored in.

http://www.4lo.com/calc/geartable.htm
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #28  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
If my little sunpro tach was more accurate then the OEM tach reads about 200 rpm high.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #29  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,524
Likes: 2,829
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
If you look at this chart you'll see that 3.55 with a 29 inch tire is around 2674 rpm at 65 mph. This is with a 1:1 ratio not counting overdrive. If you factor in overdrive it would drop to just under 2000 wouldn't it? So at 5 mph faster its up a couple hundred rpm just over 2000. Still its close to what it should be.

With a 27 inch tire and 3.55 in 3rd it would be 2872 rpm at 65 without overdrive factored in.

4Lo.com :: Gear Ratio & Tire Size Chart
The Novak calculator (not a table, so it allows different variables) agrees with this number--at 65 mph.

The post you commented on says:

<TABLE width="100%" border=0 itxtvisited="1"><TBODY itxtvisited="1"><TR itxtvisited="1"><TD vAlign=top itxtvisited="1">"I have a 302,AOD,3.55s, and 255-60-15s and I run 2300 at 70." (post 22)

The calculator says and I posted it in post 23:

"Tires should be 27", and if so:

Calculator shows 3092 at 70 in 1:1 third,
2072 rpm in .67 fourth.
"

So how can his claim to be running 2300 at 70 be "about right"?

You also mentioned 29 inch tires. Running them through the calculator with 3.55s and 1:1 third shows 2674 at 65 as you posted. With .67 fourth it would be 1791 at 65.

Based on the comparisons of the charts you posted and the various calculators, I take the charts and calculators to be accurate. Tire diameter from charts not so accurate, and if you try to figure the loaded radius of the tire based on tire pressure and load, you'll have a 2 inch + variance easily.

Tachometers are another one. I have one of those mini jobs and you can't really read it within what, 100rpm, especially under driving conditions. Speedos are always a wild card--even with the correct gear, the speedo head can be variable and/or just plain wrong.

Gears: Gears get changed.

If you are trying to solve this problem for a particular vehicle, you just need to use the KNOWN information first. The calculators and charts are not up for arguement. It is what it is, math does not change depending on brand etc. Gears are set, trans ratios the same. Torque converters slip, tachs find the general neighborhood sometimes and speedos are going from lane to lane a times. If it isn't what it "should be", if you want to find the answer, you have to check your data, not the calculators, at least not in this case.


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 04:50 AM
  #30  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
I think that the OEM tachs read a couple hundred RPM high. I just figured that if he was running about 2300 and I was running about 2100 with slightly taller tires it makes sense.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE