O2 sensor scheduled replacement. Don't think so.
I have heard one person tell me that his manual does call for a replacement, but he did not say what manual, nor did he offer to say at what mileage, nor what type shop he works at.
I am wondering if that is just the opinion of non-Ford shops. I would like to hear from someone who can identify alleged source for replacing the sensor, if it exist.
[center]
[font color="blue"]
Mudslinger_82 aka Mike G
[/font]http://farmall_h.tripod.com/tractors_files/Animated/257.gif
[font color="red"]
[marquee]Ford Power All The Way, If it ain't broke don't fix it.[/marquee][/font]
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 31-Jan-01 AT 00:05 AM (EST)[/font]
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 31-Jan-01 AT 00:00 AM (EST)[/font]
[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 30-Jan-01 AT 11:59 PM (EST)[/font]
Thanks for the reply.
I do hope to peak inquirying thoughts on this topic. Your reponse, however, reflects the general opinion that many share, and that I seek to substantiate in the form of car manufacturer documentation. I have never seen, in any official manufacturer document, i.e. Ford service manuals, that the O2 sensor should be replaced. I see many case's where the problem description includes a history of replacing the O2 sensor, "..but it did not fix the problem..". 
So, I merely seek the answer to the question; What book, or service manual, recommends changing the O2 sensor based on mileage alone. I have never seen any such thing in print. If you work at Firestone or Goodyear or Ford or any car repair shop, I would like to hear from you. There are many consumable components, such as hoses, belts, filters, but nowhere do I see that sensors be routinely replaced. In fact, there is much documentation from every repair source, that explains the role of the sensor in alerting the car owner to emissions problems. As they say, don't kill the messenger, just for giving you the message. My point is that the O2 sensor is the messenger, not the cause, in the majority of cases.
It is even documented that most contaminants, i.e. carbon and coolent, will burn off the sensor tip after an hour of driving on the freeway.
I respectfully reiterate; What document states that a O2 sensor should be replaced as part of a minor or major scheduled tune-up? I would like to point out that Ford is precise and explicit when it comes to the check list of tune up items for the recommended schedule of maintainence. This "scheduled" maintence list is no secret. It is available to anyone who wants to see it. Perhaps the average home mechanic has always glossed over this chapter in the Haynes and Chilton manual, in search of their immediate car problem topic, but that information has always been published. And it is based on the published manufacturers recommended maintainence.
Are we to believe that a new O2 sensor is as worthwhile as new plug wires? Plug wire replacement, although expensive, and not always needed, are a part of routine documented replacement for some cars. But I do not see the O2 sensor listed on the check list. Does anyone?
I have tested O2 sensors that car owner have wanted to replace; in fact, they have already bought new one's at the price of $120 for 2. I have never found a defective O2 sensor. The test is as quick and easy as any voltage test I have perfomed.
It truely seems to me that replacing these sensors is convienent and profitable for shops for several reasons, including the remote possibility that it may be faulty. I understand that form of economics. But, I seek to learn the true economics of replacing $120 worth of sensors when it has never been promoted by the manufacturers.
Sorry to be long winded. Can you feel my frustration?

2000 XLT Flare Supercab Sport 5.4-Auto-355LS-Tow pkg-Bedrug-Xtang Tonneau
Now that you mention it, I would love to have a lab scope but I don't think they make any for under $500 do they? You have touched on a interesting point about lazy injectors. My DMM tester will show activity and voltage levels, min, max, average, but I have not taken a class in O2 testing, so I can't be sure they are 100% operation. For example, would you know if a min and max voltage reading of 250mv / 950mv is normal at idle. It seems a bit of a wide swing to me, but 100mv to 900mv is within the correct operating range, or close to it.
I do seem to recall the early model 'emissions light' which has now been replaced with the 'check engine' light.
Thank you.
2000 XLT Flare Supercab Sport 5.4-Auto-355LS-Tow pkg-Bedrug-Xtang Tonneau
Mike
Trending Topics
2000 XLT Flare Supercab Sport 5.4-Auto-355LS-Tow pkg-Bedrug-Xtang Tonneau
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
You da man! Glad to hear from you. I have read that 8 crossings per 10 seconds is the rule. But unfortunately, WHAT rule are they talking about? I am unsure which of the two it is:
1. 8 per 10 sec is the MINIMUM crossings. 7 or less or not good.
2. 8 per 10 sec is the AVERAGE crossings. 6 or 7 is acceptable.
Could you clear up which of the above is the 'rule'?
Also, if a DMM function for Average millivolts, reads 650 instead of 450, yet has 10 crosscounts per 10 sec, it that considered acceptable for the sensor?
2000 XLT Flare Supercab Sport 5.4-Auto-355LS-Tow pkg-Bedrug-Xtang Tonneau
You have cleared up quite a bit for me. However, I still confuse the readings for a 'good 02 sensor' with the performance of the car. For example:
1. I believe this 02 sensor is sound and good, but that doesn't mean the engine is running avg on fuel consumption.
2. Thus the 650mv Average reading, indicates an engine that is running rich, is that right? ? ?
Sometimes I simply get confused between a 'good' sensor, and a 'good' running engine. In this case, I think I have good sensor but rich engine.
The owner says he gets poor gas mileage, but I can't pull codes with a scanner for the 96 Ford OBDII. But the check engine light is always on and the truck runs fine.
2000 XLT Flare Supercab Sport 5.4-Auto-355LS-Tow pkg-Bedrug-Xtang Tonneau





