1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage

Want to take off cats.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-15-2008, 03:00 PM
applegatel6's Avatar
applegatel6
applegatel6 is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
removing cats

it is a federally mandated if you are caught removing them you can go to jail or be fined out the ***.
 
  #32  
Old 09-15-2008, 06:55 PM
TheTinian's Avatar
TheTinian
TheTinian is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Club Wagon
Since this topic was "started again" the responses have been overwelmingly AGAINST the plan: "Want to take off cats" which is representative of past threads on the subject. At least 16 responses are AGAINST, while just 2 are plainly FOR. As has been the case previously, those AGAINST explained the sound reasons for keeping cats in place, while those FOR removing cats post dubious comments like: the "loss in low end torque" the nebulous "youll love it" in support of their opinion. I get the impression a very large majority does not "love" the increased air & noise pollution resulting when you "take off cats".
You really think a truck with no cats is going to destroy the atmosphere? Give me a break. How about all the factorys, dump trucks, and even better when you see a car atleast once a week goin down the road blowing so much blue smoke that the cars behind him has to almost stop since they cant see. Or how about all the illegal dumping, burning and etc... Trucks with no cats should be the least of our worries right now.

I get the impression that alot of the people who comment on this or think that they know more than somebody else has never done it or have no idea what they are talking about. Why do you think the older cars and trucks didnt even come with cats and almost all of them on the road still dont have them?

Like I said before, i didnt want to get in it again, but apparently its a big topic here about once a month, so why not.

But here in Florida there is no inspections and it really seems that no-one gives a ***** any more. If your in a state with inspections i would have to say definatly DONT do it. It wouldnt be worth the hassle of trying to pass. On the other hand, if you have no inspections go for it.
 
  #33  
Old 09-15-2008, 07:00 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
MisterCMK is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Blue Hill Township
Posts: 24,708
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
To those of you who claim that you can go to jail and have ridiculous fines, please provide a source to back up your claim.
 
  #34  
Old 09-15-2008, 07:08 PM
applegatel6's Avatar
applegatel6
applegatel6 is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its a federal law, its is illegal to remove a good cat for no reason,
 
  #35  
Old 09-15-2008, 09:26 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
MisterCMK...never did the research on this before, but I just did some digging at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and here's what I found:

From the Federal Clean Air Act:

SEC. 203. (a) The following acts and the causing thereof are
prohibited—
...........
(3)(A) for any person to remove or render inoperative any
device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle
or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under
this title prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser,
or for any person knowingly to remove or render inoperative
any such device or element of design after such sale
and delivery to the ultimate purchaser


Any person other than a manufacturer or dealer who
violates section 203(a)(3)(A) or any person who violates section
203(a)(3)(B) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than
$2,500.


Check it out, page 237 of the federal clean air act.....
 
  #36  
Old 09-15-2008, 09:43 PM
2002 F350V10's Avatar
2002 F350V10
2002 F350V10 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The law is the law and it is there fior a reason. Catalytic converters are there for a reason, and absolutely no shop I know of will remove a converter and by pass it and issue a reciept stating such. The catalytic converters today are free flowing, and while you might be in a part of the country where it is not checked, hope you never move to where they do. Since I bought my F350 new in 02, my truck has been visually checked for a converter all 3 times it has been summoned to a mandatory emissions test in Illinois. I was also pulled over in Ohio when the truck was about 6 months old, and during the stop, the trooper looked underneath with a mirror checking for the presence of a catalytic converter. Also the gas cap has been tested, along with making sure the computer is working and not storing any mil codes during all emissions tests. In Illinois, if you fail the emissions test , or simply ignore the notices, eventually your license plates and or drivers license will be suspended. Atleast where I live, there is little to gain and much to lose by removing a converter.
 
  #37  
Old 09-15-2008, 09:48 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
Originally Posted by TheTinian
. Why do you think the older cars and trucks didnt even come with cats and almost all of them on the road still dont have them?
Well, see...that would be a 1968 model...and not many of them are on the road anymore...cats or otherwise!

And, will one truck cause problems? Probably not...but if everyone thinks like you do...we will have a problem! As I stated before...no consideration for anyone else....a real shame....
 
  #38  
Old 09-15-2008, 10:37 PM
2002 F350V10's Avatar
2002 F350V10
2002 F350V10 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Two well known custom builders ended up with hefty fines concerning emissions.

Boyd Coddington somehow titled newly custom built hot rod cars as vintage cars, and as a vintage car it was emissions exempt, even though little to nothing on the car was vintage. He did this to circumvent emissions laws. This was called a "Ship of Theseus"
fraud. $3000 fine 160 hours community service.

Jesse James (west coast choppers)was caught selling new custom motorcycles which did not meet emissions requirements, and he tried to have an agreement which basically he would recall and modify all motorcycles to meet emissions standards. Somehow the state of california declined and fined him some $271,250 for the 50 motorcycles he built during that period.
 
  #39  
Old 09-15-2008, 11:10 PM
Bear River's Avatar
Bear River
Bear River is offline
Former ******
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Now granted, California is a different animal, they go above and beyond Federal mandates because they can. Most of the nation is not that stringent. However, what do you hope to gain by doing so. Seriously, the modern catalyst is extremely free flowing, plus as the hot gases expand from further burning in the catalyst can under certain conditions actually increase power, something I didn't believe it was a strong effect till I saw a track car improve its quarter mile by a little more than a tenth of a second running cats (the driver forgot to take them off before the race). The car was a 1988 Buick Grand National running a bored 4.0L and twin turbos. This car engine dynoed at just over 750 hp. I was impressed, I knew cats didn't restrict much, and that under certain conditions they could increase torque, but not that they could shave more than a tenth of a second off a track car.
 
  #40  
Old 09-16-2008, 04:24 PM
Peter94's Avatar
Peter94
Peter94 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Peter
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if the heavy equiptment industry has been mandated to any emissions standards. I know as time goes on it is a growing concern, and I thought I remember someone saying that they did have a set of standards to adhere to.

Also on a side note, pretty soon lawn and garden equipt. will have more emssions equiptment on them, so people will be cutting off their baby cats to gain more HP out of their Toro.

Anyone ever wonder why the old lawn boy 2cyl has vanished?
 
  #41  
Old 09-16-2008, 08:14 PM
Ultramagdan's Avatar
Ultramagdan
Ultramagdan is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kansas
Posts: 11,496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter94
Anyone ever wonder why the old lawn boy 2cyl has vanished?
Because the last ones made were junk. You can still find old lawn boys that run well. That, and the emissions would be tough on them. That is a cool story about the Grand National. I've seen enough hachet jobs from people who thought they were freeing the engine up only to trash a vehicle in the process and it's resale value.
 
  #42  
Old 09-16-2008, 09:51 PM
2002 F350V10's Avatar
2002 F350V10
2002 F350V10 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the trucking industry carries alot of weight in washington. But as of recently, diesel fuel is now low sulphur, so something has happened to reduce emissions. .
 
  #43  
Old 09-17-2008, 10:04 AM
highboy390fe's Avatar
highboy390fe
highboy390fe is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is a ton of new emissions stuff for all the new 08 diesel and its getting stiffer every year.
 
  #44  
Old 09-17-2008, 12:16 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
Yeah, the diesel emissions regs are starting to get ridiculous...they're driving down the efficiency of the engines, causing them to burn more fuel...all over harmless particulates...
 
  #45  
Old 09-17-2008, 01:53 PM
Club Wagon's Avatar
Club Wagon
Club Wagon is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
"Yeah...ridiculous" another "harmless" boogeyman to add to the list.

Originally Posted by Crazy001
all over harmless particulates
Right all "harmless" like; asbestos, DDT, Dioxin, PVC, PCBs, FREON, Nicotene, DES, lead, mercury, fallout from atmospheric nuke tests, etc?

IMO commercial diesel engines have actually been enjoying significant improvements in efficiency brought about by extensive research & severe market pressures to reduce operating costs.
 


Quick Reply: Want to take off cats.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.